Entity Name: | BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. |
Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
Filing Type: |
Florida Limited Liability Co.
BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. is structured as a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a common business structure that offers its members limited liability protection, separating their personal assets from the company's debts and obligations. |
Status: |
Active
The business entity is active. This status indicates that the business is currently operating and compliant with state regulations, suggesting a lower risk profile for lenders and potentially better creditworthiness. |
Date Filed: | 23 May 2024 (a year ago) |
Document Number: | L24000238757 |
FEI/EIN Number |
99-3571916
Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS. |
Address: | 4908 ELM AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, FL, 34982, US |
Mail Address: | 4908 ELM AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, FL, 34982, US |
ZIP code: | 34982 |
County: | St. Lucie |
Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
Name | Role | Address |
---|---|---|
SMITH BLAKE D | Manager | 4908 ELM AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, FL, 34982 |
SMITH BLAKE D | Agent | 4908 ELM AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, FL, 34982 |
Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLAKE SMITH, Appellant(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee(s) | 4D2022-2561 | 2022-09-20 | Closed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name | BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Representations | Palm Beach Public Defender, Paul Edward Petillo, Christine C. Geraghty |
Name | STATE OF FLORIDA LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Attorney General-W.P.B., Rachael Paula Kaiman |
Name | Hon. Kathryn Nelson |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | St. Lucie Clerk |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2023-02-13 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2023-01-11 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 2/11/23. |
Docket Date | 2023-01-11 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2022-12-14 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2022-12-13 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Supplemental Record |
Description | Supplemental Records ~ TRANSCRIPT (381 PAGES) |
Docket Date | 2022-11-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Transmit Record/Supplemental Record on Appeal |
Description | Order to Supplement Record - transcript ~ ORDERED that appellant's November 14, 2022 amended motion to supplement the record and reset the briefing schedule is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The court reporter shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to prepare the transcript. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within ten (10) days from receipt of the transcripts. The briefing schedule is reset to begin from the date of the filing of the supplemental record and. appellant shall monitor the supplementation process. |
Docket Date | 2022-11-14 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Motion To File Supplemental Record ~ **AMENDED** AND TO RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2022-11-08 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Transmit Record/Supplemental Record on Appeal |
Description | Order to Supplement Record - transcript ~ ORDERED that appellant's November 7, 2022 motion to supplement the record and reset the briefing schedule is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The court reporter shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to prepare the transcript. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within ten (10) days from receipt of the transcripts. The briefing schedule is reset to begin from the date of the filing of the supplemental record and. appellant shall monitor the supplementation process. |
Docket Date | 2022-11-07 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Motion To File Supplemental Record ~ AND RESET THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2022-11-02 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Exhibits |
Description | Received Exhibits ~ ONE ENVELOPE CONTAINING SEVERAL CD ROMS |
Docket Date | 2022-10-31 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Record on Appeal Confidential |
Description | Confidential Records ~ (105 PAGES) |
Docket Date | 2022-10-07 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
Description | Order LT Insolvency & Appointing PD |
Docket Date | 2022-09-21 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ DUPLICATE |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2022-09-20 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
Docket Date | 2022-09-20 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2022-09-20 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2023-02-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing |
Description | Ord-Supplement ROA & Toll Time for Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's February 22, 2023 motion to supplement the record and toll time to serve initial brief is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process. Further,ORDERED that the time for filing appellant's initial brief is tolled until ten (10) days after the supplemental record is received. |
Docket Date | 2023-02-23 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing |
Description | Mot. file supp'l ROA & toll time |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2024-07-25 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Transfer |
Description | ORDERED that Appellant's July 12, 2024 filing is transferred to the county court for treatment as a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. |
View | View File |
Docket Date | 2024-07-12 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
Description | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
Docket Date | 2023-09-29 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | West Publishing |
Description | West Publishing |
Docket Date | 2023-09-29 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate |
View | View File |
Docket Date | 2023-08-31 |
Type | Disposition by Opinion |
Subtype | Affirmed |
Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
Docket Date | 2023-06-16 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Reply Brief |
Description | Appellant's Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2023-05-19 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Answer Brief |
Description | Appellee's Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | State of Florida |
Docket Date | 2023-05-15 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Initial Brief |
Description | Initial Brief on Merits |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2023-04-13 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 5/13/23. |
Docket Date | 2023-04-13 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2023-03-13 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Supplemental Record |
Description | Supplemental Records ~ (337 PAGES) |
Docket Date | 2023-02-22 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing |
Description | Mot. file supp'l ROA & toll time ~ AMENDED MOTION FILED. |
On Behalf Of | Blake Smith |
Docket Date | 2023-02-13 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 3/15/23. |
Docket Date | 2022-09-20 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee - pro se criminal appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. If you have already been found indigent for purposes of proceedings in the lower tribunal, in this case, please file a copy of that order in this court.If you do not have an order or a determination of indigent status and believe that you are insolvent, complete the enclosed application and mail to the clerk of the lower tribunal within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. A Notice of Compliance that you have applied for indigent status must also be filed with this court. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall forward the Clerk's Determination to this court within ten (10) days of receipt. Failure of appellant to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836 |
Parties
Name | Christine Scott *P* |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | Steven D. Moore |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Dawicke |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Joseph Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Connie Wolverton |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | John Stobar |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Russell Sweet |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lois A. Spoo |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Angelica Cortez |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Robert Denning |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Drew Flynn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara E. Harrington |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Clyde Winn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Hampton C. Peterson |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | KRISTIN WILSON, LLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Michael Doe |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Evan Gray |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Karina Rodriguez-Matzen |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Jamie Gauthier |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Janis Sustache |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Stephanie Patty |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Representations | JoAnn Nesta Burnett, Richard P. Cole, Hampton C. Peterson, Jorge E. Torres-Puig, Stephen Nicholas Harber, Gary Charles Rosen, Hon. April Bristow |
Name | Kathleen Savor |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Karla Guzman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | David Hagadorn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lisa Spann |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lourdes Gerstenberger |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dorothy Flynn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Joyce Vail |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | CINDY GUERRA, INC. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Provalenko |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Denise M. Denning |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Adian Skipper |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dick Harrington |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | John Paul Herman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Isai Bonilla |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lawrence Mitchler |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Miriam Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Adrian Ashton |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Marilyn Drumheiser |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Diane Hagadorn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Cheryl A. Caracuzzo |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Glenn Kelley |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. John S. Kastrenakes |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Renatha Francis |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Krista Marx |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Denied - Order by Judge |
Docket Date | 2021-09-23 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Mandamus |
Description | Petition Mandamus / Acknowledgment letter |
Docket Date | 2021-09-21 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
Description | ORD-L.T. INSOLVENCY OR INDIGE. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-21 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Mandamus |
Description | Petition Mandamus |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Mandamus ~ ORDERED that this court determines that this proceeding is frivolous. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. The court reserves jurisdiction to impose sanctions. Petitioner has filed numerous frivolous pro se pleadings in this court and in the circuit court below. Accordingly, within ten (10) days of this order, petitioner shall file a response with this court and show cause why she should not be prohibited from further pro se filing in this court unless the document has been reviewed and signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar who certifies that a good faith basis exists for each claim presented. Johnson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller, 133 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 2006).GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. |
Docket Date | 9999-10-26 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
Description | Miscellaneous (DNU) ~ **PETITIONER IS PROHIBITED** |
Docket Date | 2021-10-26 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Prohibited from Pro Se Filing |
Description | PROHIBITED from further pro se filings ~ ORDERED that, having considered petitioner’s October 18, 2021 response to this court’s October 6, 2021 order to show cause, the court determines that sanctions are appropriate. Petitioner has filed numerous rambling and frivolous pro se documents in this court and in the proceedings below. Petitioner was recently cautioned against frivolous and abusive filing in this court’s September 28, 2021 order in case number 4D21-1747. The rambling and frivolous response to this court’s order to show cause convinces this court that sanctions are necessary. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to no longer accept petitioner’s pro se filings unless the document has been reviewed and signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar who certifies that a good faith basis exists for each claim presented. Johnson v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller,133 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 2006). Unless this court rules otherwise, petitioner may file pro se in case numbers 4D20-2220 and 4D21-1747, which were pending in this court when this sanction issued. |
Docket Date | 2021-10-18 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response to Order to Show Cause |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836 |
Parties
Name | Christine Scott *P* |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | Deborah J. Mitchler |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Miriam Ricker |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Diane Hagadorn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Provalenko |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | John Paul Herman |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Lawrence Mitchler |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Isai Bonilla |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Lois A. Spoo |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Lourdes Gerstenberger |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Adrian Ashton |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Clyde Winn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Marilyn Drumheiser |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Jamie Gauthier |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Drew Flynn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Steven D. Moore |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Adian Skipper |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Hampton C. Peterson |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Karla Guzman |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Michael Doe |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | John Stobar |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Joseph Ricker |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Nancy Mathieu |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara E. Harrington |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Denise M. Denning |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Angelica Cortez |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Evan Gray |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Connie Wolverton |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | David Hagadorn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | KRISTIN WILSON, LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Martinique Sanders |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Joyce Vail |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Jorge E. Torres-Puig, Gary Charles Rosen, Therese Ann Savona, JoAnn Nesta Burnett, Hon. April Bristow, Lissette M. Gonzalez, Stephen Nicholas Harber, Richard P. Cole |
Name | Janis Sustache |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Robert Denning |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Karina Rodriguez-Matzen |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Dorothy Flynn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Kathleen Savor |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | CINDY GUERRA, INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Stephanie Patty |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Russell Sweet |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Lisa Spann |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Dawicke |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Dick Harrington |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Samquisha Lane |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. John S. Kastrenakes |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Glenn Kelley |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Edward L. Artau |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Cheryl A. Caracuzzo |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2023-05-05 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate |
Docket Date | 2023-04-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
Description | ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 15, 2023 motion for rehearing, clarification, or written opinion is denied. |
Docket Date | 2023-04-12 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION OR WRITTEN OPINION |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2023-04-03 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc.'s March 30, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s March 15, 2023 motion for rehearing is extended ten (10) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-30 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-30 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-17 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate ~ ***VACATED SEE 3/17/23 ORDER*** |
Docket Date | 2023-03-17 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | West Publishing |
Description | West Publishing |
Docket Date | 2023-03-17 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order |
Description | Order Vacated ~ ORDERED that this court's March 17, 2023 mandate is vacated as issued in error. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 13, 2023 motion for extension of time is denied. Appellant shall file any reply she wishes to submit on or before March 15, 2023, at 11:59 pm. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-15 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion For Rehearing ~ Clarification or Written Opinion |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2023-03-13 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2023-03-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 9, 2023 motion for extension of time is denied. Appellant shall file any reply she wishes to submit within five (5) days of the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-09 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2023-02-09 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO SUBMIT MOTION FOR REHEARING |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2023-02-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s February 9, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant may file a motion for rehearing within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2023-01-26 |
Type | Disposition by Opinion |
Subtype | Affirmed |
Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
Docket Date | 2023-01-26 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Order Granting Attorney Fees-Unconditionally ~ ORDERED that appellee Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc.’s July 25, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. |
Docket Date | 2022-10-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Dispensing with Oral Argument |
Description | ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court. |
Docket Date | 2022-08-31 |
Type | Motions Relating to Oral Argument |
Subtype | Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
Description | Request for Oral Argument |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2022-07-25 |
Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2022-07-25 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Reply Brief |
Description | Appellant's Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2022-06-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORD-Reply Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it will be subject to being stricken, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the reply brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. |
Docket Date | 2022-06-14 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2022-05-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s May 17, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken. |
Docket Date | 2022-05-17 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2022-04-18 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Answer Brief |
Description | Appellee's Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-06-30 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 29, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the current due date. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
Docket Date | 2022-03-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | ORD-Answer Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellees’ March 11, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein will foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellees are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the answer brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time. |
Docket Date | 2022-03-11 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee’s February 3, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-03 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-04 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees’ December 27, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-27 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-14 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Record on Appeal |
Description | Received Records ~ VOLUME 3a (PAGES 96,082-124,159) |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-06-07 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
Description | Determination of Indigent Status |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-06-02 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO SERVE JUDGE KASTENAKES AS PARTY |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-06-02 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-06-01 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2021-05-28 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ Indigent per 19-2817 |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-05-28 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | WV:Waived |
Docket Date | 2021-12-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 “motion for rehearing on payment plan” is granted and the portion of this court’s November 1, 2021 order directing appellant to enter into a payment plan with the clerk of the lower court is vacated. The clerk is directed to file the record on appeal with this Court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. See § 57.082(6), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“A case may not be impeded in any way, delayed in filing, or delayed in its progress, including the final hearing and order, due to nonpayment of any fees or costs by an indigent person.”). This ruling is without prejudice to the clerk pursuing any remedies available pursuant to section 28.246, Florida Statutes (2021), for payment, as the indigent party is required to pay for services of the clerk in preparation of the record. Section 57.081, Florida Statutes (2021), does not provide that the services of the court are provided without cost to the indigent party. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 “motion for rehearing on appointment for counsel” is denied. See § 27.511(a), Fla. Stat. (2021) (listing the civil actions where a party is entitled to court appointed counsel); Bova v. State, 410 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 1982) (“Right-to-counsel protections do not extend to civil parties or witnesses . . .”); Onett v. Ahola, 780 So. 2d 979, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“There is no absolute right to counsel in a civil proceeding.”). Further,ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 emergency motion for continuance is denied. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-08 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-12-08 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ ON PAYMENT PLAN |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-11-23 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees’ November 15, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-11-22 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-11-16 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, the clerk of the lower tribunal shall file a status report which indicates whether appellant entered into the payment plan as required by this court’s November 1, 2021 order. |
Docket Date | 2021-11-15 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-06-29 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-06-15 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-06-07 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 2, 2021 “motion to serve . . .” is denied. Appellant did not file a petition for writ of prohibition in this case, but instead seeks review of the April 29, 2021 order clarifying case status and directing the clerk to place the case in a reopen status. |
Docket Date | 2021-11-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 8, 2021 motion to transfer record on appeal from lower court is denied. Appellant shall enter into a payment plan with the clerk of the lower tribunal within seven (7) from the date of this order. Failure to enter into a payment plan as provided in this order will result in dismissal of this appeal. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s September 21, 2021 motion to appoint counsel is denied as a party to a civil action is not guaranteed the right to counsel. See Bova v. State, 410 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 1982) (“Right-to-counsel protections do not extend to civil parties or witnesses . . .”); Onett v. Ahola, 780 So. 2d 979, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“There is no absolute right to counsel in a civil proceeding.”). Further, ORDERED that appellant’s September 22, 2021 motion to file supplemental record is denied. See Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 534 So. 2d 754, 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). |
Docket Date | 2021-10-15 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Initial Brief |
Description | Initial Brief on Merits |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-30 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-09-28 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
Description | ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 22, 2021 notice is stricken as unauthorized. Appellant is advised that, as is the case for all appellate courts in the State of Florida, all orders issued by this court contain the signature of the Clerk. This court’s September 22, 2021 order contains the signature of the Clerk on the second page of the order, which was necessitated by the length of the service list in this case.The court also notes that appellant’s September 9, 2021 and September 22, 2021 notices contain various personal attacks on various individuals and states opinions which are wholly irrelevant to this court’s review of the order on appeal - the April 29, 2021 order clarifying case status and directing the clerk of the lower tribunal to place the case in a reopen status. For example, in the September 9, 2021 notice, appellant, without substantiation, references alleged “nefarious attacks” against her and claims that “Clerks, deputy clerks and court tech” are using “computer programs/software/code/cyber-attacks as a weapon against litigants” in an effort to thwart her case. In the September 22, 2021 notice, in addition to appellant’s incorrect claim that this court’s earlier September 22, 2021 order did not contain the signature of the Clerk, appellant: (1) refers to personnel from this court and the lower tribunal clerk as “rogue”; (2) suggests that this court terminate, withhold the salary, and seize the assets of its personnel who acted pursuant to the court’s direction; (3) claims this court’s actions are a “tyrannical act of treason”; and (4) disparages, without justification, various personnel employed by the clerk of the lower tribunal. None of the foregoing has any relation or is directed to the merits of the circuit court’s entry of the order on appeal. Previously, in an October 31, 2019 motion filed in Case No. 4D19-2560, a prior case between the parties, appellant accused personnel of the lower tribunal clerk as performing “rogue and illegal actions” and “writing fake orders of deception,” and accused personnel of this court of manipulating court orders and “deceitfully attempting to pretend to the Honorable Judges of the Fourth District Court of Appeals.” Appellant’s actions and allegations are an abuse of the processes of the court and hinder the ability to resolve matters properly before the court.Therefore, appellant is warned that continued frivolous filings in this court may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition on pro se filing. See Johnson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Tr. Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller, 133 So. 3d 926, 927 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186–87 (Fla. 2006) (“Upon a thorough review of May’s filings in this Court, we conclude that May has abused the processes of the Court and has hindered the ability of this Court to properly resolve those matters that are properly before the Court.”). |
Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Supplemental Record |
Description | Supplemental Records ~ *PROPOSED* |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice ~ OF 4DCA CLERK'S UNSIGNED 'ORDER', FILED ON SEPT 22, 2021 **STRICKEN** |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the clerk of the lower tribunal is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the setup of a payment plan for the record on appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Motion To File Supplemental Record |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-21 |
Type | Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel |
Subtype | Motion for Appointment of Counsel |
Description | Motion for Appointment of Counsel |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-20 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the clerk of the lower tribunal is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the setup of a payment plan for the record on appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-20 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 8, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-09 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Filing |
Description | Notice of Filing ~ OF LOWER COURT INDIGENCY PAPERWORK FOR LITIGANT |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO TRANSFER RECORD ON APPEAL FROM LOWER TRIBUNAL |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-08-31 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice ~ OF INABILITY TO TRANSMIT RECORD ON APPEAL |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-08-03 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s July 30, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty (20) days from receipt of the index. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s August 2, 2021 motion for clarification of due date of initial brief is denied as moot. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-02 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion For Clarification |
Description | Motion For Clarification ~ OF DUE DATE FOR INITIAL BRIEF |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-07-30 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-07-20 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that the lower tribunal clerk’s July 15, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and the record on appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the current due date. The clerk of the lower tribunal may file the record on appeal in no more than five (5) PDF documents. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-15 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ AND TO TRANSMIT THE RECORD IN MULTIPLE VOLUMES |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836 |
Parties
Name | Christine Scott *P* |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | Hampton C. Peterson |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Kathleen Savor |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Adrian Ashton |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | ADAIN SKIPPER |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Sharon R. Bock, Clerk and Comptroller |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Bill Doe |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Jamie Gauthier |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Representations | Hon. April Bristow, Gary Charles Rosen, Therese Ann Savona, Jorge E. Torres-Puig, Hampton C. Peterson, Stephen Nicholas Harber, JoAnn Nesta Burnett, STEVEN B. LESSER, Richard P. Cole |
Name | John Paul Herman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | David Hagadorn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Martinique Sanders |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara E. Harrington |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | KRISTIN WILSON, LLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Dawicke |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Karina Rodriguez-Matzen |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Margaret L. Scott |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | COURT TECH |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Isai Bonilla |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Nancy Mathieu |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Karla Guzman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Provalenko |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dorothy Flynn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Robert Denning |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | CINDY GUERRA, INC. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Clyde Winn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Rayez Ali |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | John Stobar |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | PBCGOV.ORG Tech Team |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Samquisha Lane |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dave Armstrong |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | FEMALE TRESPASSER |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Angelica Cortez |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lisa Spann |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Steven D. Moore |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | PALM BEACH COUNTY CLERK & COMPTROLLER |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lawrence Mitchler |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Michael Doe |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | DON MARTIN, INC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | CAROLYN BODMAN |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | JOHN DOE 2 |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Andrew Doe |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Stephanie Patty |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dennis Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | MALE TRESPASSER |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lourdes Gerstenberger |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Joyce Vail |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Janis Sustache |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Denise M. Denning |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Joseph Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Connie Wolverton |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Miriam Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lois A. Spoo |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Marilyn Drumheiser |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Russell Sweet |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Drew Flynn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Evan Gray |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Carole Bleecker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Diane Hagadorn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Cheryl A. Caracuzzo |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. John S. Kastrenakes |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2222-12-30 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ **RETURNED MAIL RECEIVED FOR CAROLYN BODMAN, VACANT** |
Docket Date | 2019-12-12 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Denied - Order by Judge |
Docket Date | 2019-12-12 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Mandamus ~ ORDERED that the November 15, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus is denied.MAY, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ.,concur. |
Docket Date | 2019-11-19 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Mandamus |
Description | Petition Mandamus / Acknowledgment letter |
Docket Date | 2019-11-15 |
Type | Supreme Court |
Subtype | Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court |
Description | Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court |
Docket Date | 2019-11-15 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | WV:Waived |
Docket Date | 2019-11-15 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance ~ ***TRANSFER FROM SUPREME COURT*** |
Docket Date | 2019-11-15 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Mandamus |
Description | Petition Mandamus ~ ***TRANSFER FROM SUPREME COURT*** |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Classification | Original Proceedings - Writ - Mandamus |
Court | Supreme Court of Florida |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836XXXXMB |
Parties
Name | Ms. Christine Scott |
Role | Petitioner |
Status | Active |
Name | Steven Lesser |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Martinique Sanders |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Clyde Winn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lisa Spann |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Joyce Vail |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dave Armstrong |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Diane Hagadorn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Janis Sustache |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | PBCGov.Org Tech Team |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Joseph Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Samquisha Lane |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | DON MARTIN, INC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Karla Guzman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Steven D. Moore |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Karina Rodriguez-Matzen |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Kristin Butler Wilson |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Mr. Jorge E. Torres-Puig |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Mr. Stephen N. Harber |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Deborah Mitchler |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Cole, Scott and Kissane, P.A. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Adain Skipper |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lourdes Gerstenberger |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Gary Rosen |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Marilynn Drumheiser |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Nancy Mathieu |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Denise Denning |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Miriam Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Bill Doe |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Russell Sweet |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | CINDY GUERRA, INC. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | ADRIAN DOMINIC ASHTON |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Connie Wolverton |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Robert Denning |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dennis Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Andew Doe |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | John Stobar |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | COURT TECHNOLOGY LLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | John P. Herman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Dawicke |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Carole Bleecker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dorothy Flynn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Isai Bonilla |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Carolyn Bodman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | David Hagadorn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Harrington |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Evan Gray |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Sharon Repak Bock |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Ms. JoAnn Nesta Burnett |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Richard P. Cole |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lawrence Mitchler |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | HAMPTON PETERSON, PLLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Provalenko |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Rayez Ali |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Jamie Gauthier |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Michael Doe |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Angelica Cortez |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Stephanie Patty |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lois A. Spoo |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Representations | Ms. Therese Ann Savona |
Name | Sharon Repak Bock |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2019-11-15 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Tsfr Circ Ct/DCA (Harvard) |
Description | DISP-TSFR CIRC CT/DCA (HARVARD) ~ The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby transferred, pursuant to Harvard v. Singletary, 733 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 1999), to the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The transfer of this case should not be construed as an adjudication or comment on the merits of the petition, nor as a determination that the transferee court has jurisdiction or that the petition has been properly denominated as a petition for writ of mandamus. The transferee court should not interpret the transfer of this case as an indication that it must or should reach the merits of the petition. The transferee court shall treat the petition as if it had been originally filed there on the date it was filed in this Court. Any determination concerning whether a filing fee shall be applicable to this case shall be made by the transferee court. Any and all pending motions in this case are hereby deferred to the transferee court.Any future pleadings filed regarding this case should be filed in the above mentioned district court at 110 South Tamarind Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. |
Docket Date | 2019-11-14 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Appearance |
Description | NOTICE-APPEARANCE |
On Behalf Of | Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc. |
View | View File |
Docket Date | 2019-11-06 |
Type | Letter-Case |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter-New Case |
Description | ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE |
Docket Date | 2019-11-06 |
Type | Event |
Subtype | No Fee - Insolvent |
Description | No Fee - Insolvent ~ Insolvent Below |
Docket Date | 2019-11-04 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | NI:No Fee - Insolvent |
Docket Date | 2019-11-04 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Filed |
Description | PETITION-MANDAMUS |
On Behalf Of | Ms. Christine Scott |
View | View File |
Name | Date |
---|---|
ANNUAL REPORT | 2025-02-02 |
Florida Limited Liability | 2024-05-23 |
Date of last update: 03 May 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State