Entity Name: | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
Filing Type: | Domestic Non-Profit |
Status: |
Active
The business entity is active. This status indicates that the business is currently operating and compliant with state regulations, suggesting a lower risk profile for lenders and potentially better creditworthiness. |
Date Filed: | 01 Feb 1962 (63 years ago) |
Last Event: | AMENDMENT |
Event Date Filed: | 14 May 1991 (34 years ago) |
Document Number: | 703355 |
FEI/EIN Number |
596140131
Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS. |
Address: | 8934 CYPRES ST., BOYNTON BEACH, FL, 33436, US |
Mail Address: | 8934 CYPRES ST., BOYNTON BEACH, FL, 33436, US |
ZIP code: | 33436 |
County: | Palm Beach |
Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
Name | Role | Address |
---|---|---|
Del Gaudio Veronica | President | 8917 CYPRESS ST, Boynton Beach, FL, 33436 |
BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A. | Agent | - |
KOWALSKI NANCY | Secretary | 4207 N Shady Lane, Boynton Beach, FL, 33436 |
Sookhoo Adesh | Vice President | 8941 Lawrence Rd., Boynton Beach, FL, 33436 |
Zeinstra Thomas S | Director | 4034 S Shady Lane, Boynton Beach, FL, 33436 |
Fontaine Christine S | Director | 4229 N Shady Ln, Boynton Beach, FL, 33436 |
Kowalski Joanne | Director | 8897 W Shady Ln, Boynton Beach, FL, 33436 |
Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
---|---|---|---|
REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED | 2024-08-22 | BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A. | - |
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2024-08-22 | 1 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD, SUITE 1800, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 | - |
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS | 2023-12-16 | 8934 CYPRES ST., BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436 | - |
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS | 2023-12-16 | 8934 CYPRES ST., BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436 | - |
AMENDMENT | 1991-05-14 | - | - |
AMENDMENT | 1990-12-10 | - | - |
Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRISTINE SCOTT VS PIN-GRO-VIL, INC., et al. | 4D2021-2734 | 2021-09-21 | Closed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name | Christine Scott *P* |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | Steven D. Moore |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Dawicke |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Joseph Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Connie Wolverton |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | John Stobar |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Russell Sweet |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lois A. Spoo |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Angelica Cortez |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Robert Denning |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Drew Flynn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara E. Harrington |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Clyde Winn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Hampton C. Peterson |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | KRISTIN WILSON, LLC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Michael Doe |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Evan Gray |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Karina Rodriguez-Matzen |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Jamie Gauthier |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Janis Sustache |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Stephanie Patty |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Representations | JoAnn Nesta Burnett, Richard P. Cole, Hampton C. Peterson, Jorge E. Torres-Puig, Stephen Nicholas Harber, Gary Charles Rosen, Hon. April Bristow |
Name | Kathleen Savor |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Karla Guzman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | David Hagadorn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lisa Spann |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lourdes Gerstenberger |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dorothy Flynn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Joyce Vail |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | CINDY GUERRA, INC. |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Provalenko |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Denise M. Denning |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Adian Skipper |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Dick Harrington |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | John Paul Herman |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Isai Bonilla |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Lawrence Mitchler |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Miriam Ricker |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Adrian Ashton |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Marilyn Drumheiser |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Diane Hagadorn |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Cheryl A. Caracuzzo |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Glenn Kelley |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. John S. Kastrenakes |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Renatha Francis |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Krista Marx |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Denied - Order by Judge |
Docket Date | 2021-09-23 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Mandamus |
Description | Petition Mandamus / Acknowledgment letter |
Docket Date | 2021-09-21 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
Description | ORD-L.T. INSOLVENCY OR INDIGE. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-21 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Mandamus |
Description | Petition Mandamus |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Mandamus ~ ORDERED that this court determines that this proceeding is frivolous. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. The court reserves jurisdiction to impose sanctions. Petitioner has filed numerous frivolous pro se pleadings in this court and in the circuit court below. Accordingly, within ten (10) days of this order, petitioner shall file a response with this court and show cause why she should not be prohibited from further pro se filing in this court unless the document has been reviewed and signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar who certifies that a good faith basis exists for each claim presented. Johnson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller, 133 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 2006).GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. |
Docket Date | 9999-10-26 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
Description | Miscellaneous (DNU) ~ **PETITIONER IS PROHIBITED** |
Docket Date | 2021-10-26 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Prohibited from Pro Se Filing |
Description | PROHIBITED from further pro se filings ~ ORDERED that, having considered petitioner’s October 18, 2021 response to this court’s October 6, 2021 order to show cause, the court determines that sanctions are appropriate. Petitioner has filed numerous rambling and frivolous pro se documents in this court and in the proceedings below. Petitioner was recently cautioned against frivolous and abusive filing in this court’s September 28, 2021 order in case number 4D21-1747. The rambling and frivolous response to this court’s order to show cause convinces this court that sanctions are necessary. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to no longer accept petitioner’s pro se filings unless the document has been reviewed and signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar who certifies that a good faith basis exists for each claim presented. Johnson v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller,133 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 2006). Unless this court rules otherwise, petitioner may file pro se in case numbers 4D20-2220 and 4D21-1747, which were pending in this court when this sanction issued. |
Docket Date | 2021-10-18 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response to Order to Show Cause |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836 |
Parties
Name | Christine Scott *P* |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | Deborah J. Mitchler |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Miriam Ricker |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Diane Hagadorn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Provalenko |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | John Paul Herman |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Lawrence Mitchler |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Isai Bonilla |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Lois A. Spoo |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Lourdes Gerstenberger |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Adrian Ashton |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Clyde Winn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Marilyn Drumheiser |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | BLAKE SMITH L.L.C. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Jamie Gauthier |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Drew Flynn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Steven D. Moore |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Adian Skipper |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Hampton C. Peterson |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Karla Guzman |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Michael Doe |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | John Stobar |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Joseph Ricker |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Nancy Mathieu |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara E. Harrington |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Denise M. Denning |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Angelica Cortez |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Evan Gray |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Connie Wolverton |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | David Hagadorn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | KRISTIN WILSON, LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Martinique Sanders |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Joyce Vail |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Jorge E. Torres-Puig, Gary Charles Rosen, Therese Ann Savona, JoAnn Nesta Burnett, Hon. April Bristow, Lissette M. Gonzalez, Stephen Nicholas Harber, Richard P. Cole |
Name | Janis Sustache |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Robert Denning |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Karina Rodriguez-Matzen |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Dorothy Flynn |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Kathleen Savor |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | CINDY GUERRA, INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Stephanie Patty |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Russell Sweet |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Lisa Spann |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Barbara Dawicke |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Dick Harrington |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Samquisha Lane |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. John S. Kastrenakes |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Glenn Kelley |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Edward L. Artau |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Cheryl A. Caracuzzo |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2023-05-05 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate |
Docket Date | 2023-04-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
Description | ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 15, 2023 motion for rehearing, clarification, or written opinion is denied. |
Docket Date | 2023-04-12 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION OR WRITTEN OPINION |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2023-04-03 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc.'s March 30, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s March 15, 2023 motion for rehearing is extended ten (10) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-30 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-30 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-17 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate ~ ***VACATED SEE 3/17/23 ORDER*** |
Docket Date | 2023-03-17 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | West Publishing |
Description | West Publishing |
Docket Date | 2023-03-17 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order |
Description | Order Vacated ~ ORDERED that this court's March 17, 2023 mandate is vacated as issued in error. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 13, 2023 motion for extension of time is denied. Appellant shall file any reply she wishes to submit on or before March 15, 2023, at 11:59 pm. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-15 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion For Rehearing ~ Clarification or Written Opinion |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2023-03-13 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2023-03-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 9, 2023 motion for extension of time is denied. Appellant shall file any reply she wishes to submit within five (5) days of the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2023-03-09 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2023-02-09 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO SUBMIT MOTION FOR REHEARING |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2023-02-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s February 9, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant may file a motion for rehearing within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2023-01-26 |
Type | Disposition by Opinion |
Subtype | Affirmed |
Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
Docket Date | 2023-01-26 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Order Granting Attorney Fees-Unconditionally ~ ORDERED that appellee Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc.’s July 25, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. |
Docket Date | 2022-10-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Dispensing with Oral Argument |
Description | ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court. |
Docket Date | 2022-08-31 |
Type | Motions Relating to Oral Argument |
Subtype | Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
Description | Request for Oral Argument |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2022-07-25 |
Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2022-07-25 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Reply Brief |
Description | Appellant's Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2022-06-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORD-Reply Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it will be subject to being stricken, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the reply brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. |
Docket Date | 2022-06-14 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2022-05-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s May 17, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken. |
Docket Date | 2022-05-17 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2022-04-18 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Answer Brief |
Description | Appellee's Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-06-30 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 29, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the current due date. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
Docket Date | 2022-03-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | ORD-Answer Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellees’ March 11, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein will foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellees are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the answer brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time. |
Docket Date | 2022-03-11 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee’s February 3, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-03 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-04 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees’ December 27, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-27 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-14 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Record on Appeal |
Description | Received Records ~ VOLUME 3a (PAGES 96,082-124,159) |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-06-07 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
Description | Determination of Indigent Status |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-06-02 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO SERVE JUDGE KASTENAKES AS PARTY |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-06-02 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-06-01 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2021-05-28 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ Indigent per 19-2817 |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-05-28 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | WV:Waived |
Docket Date | 2021-12-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 “motion for rehearing on payment plan” is granted and the portion of this court’s November 1, 2021 order directing appellant to enter into a payment plan with the clerk of the lower court is vacated. The clerk is directed to file the record on appeal with this Court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. See § 57.082(6), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“A case may not be impeded in any way, delayed in filing, or delayed in its progress, including the final hearing and order, due to nonpayment of any fees or costs by an indigent person.”). This ruling is without prejudice to the clerk pursuing any remedies available pursuant to section 28.246, Florida Statutes (2021), for payment, as the indigent party is required to pay for services of the clerk in preparation of the record. Section 57.081, Florida Statutes (2021), does not provide that the services of the court are provided without cost to the indigent party. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 “motion for rehearing on appointment for counsel” is denied. See § 27.511(a), Fla. Stat. (2021) (listing the civil actions where a party is entitled to court appointed counsel); Bova v. State, 410 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 1982) (“Right-to-counsel protections do not extend to civil parties or witnesses . . .”); Onett v. Ahola, 780 So. 2d 979, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“There is no absolute right to counsel in a civil proceeding.”). Further,ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 emergency motion for continuance is denied. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-08 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-12-08 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ ON PAYMENT PLAN |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-11-23 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees’ November 15, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-11-22 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-11-16 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, the clerk of the lower tribunal shall file a status report which indicates whether appellant entered into the payment plan as required by this court’s November 1, 2021 order. |
Docket Date | 2021-11-15 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-06-29 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-06-15 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-06-07 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 2, 2021 “motion to serve . . .” is denied. Appellant did not file a petition for writ of prohibition in this case, but instead seeks review of the April 29, 2021 order clarifying case status and directing the clerk to place the case in a reopen status. |
Docket Date | 2021-11-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 8, 2021 motion to transfer record on appeal from lower court is denied. Appellant shall enter into a payment plan with the clerk of the lower tribunal within seven (7) from the date of this order. Failure to enter into a payment plan as provided in this order will result in dismissal of this appeal. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s September 21, 2021 motion to appoint counsel is denied as a party to a civil action is not guaranteed the right to counsel. See Bova v. State, 410 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 1982) (“Right-to-counsel protections do not extend to civil parties or witnesses . . .”); Onett v. Ahola, 780 So. 2d 979, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“There is no absolute right to counsel in a civil proceeding.”). Further, ORDERED that appellant’s September 22, 2021 motion to file supplemental record is denied. See Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 534 So. 2d 754, 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). |
Docket Date | 2021-10-15 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Initial Brief |
Description | Initial Brief on Merits |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-30 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-09-28 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
Description | ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 22, 2021 notice is stricken as unauthorized. Appellant is advised that, as is the case for all appellate courts in the State of Florida, all orders issued by this court contain the signature of the Clerk. This court’s September 22, 2021 order contains the signature of the Clerk on the second page of the order, which was necessitated by the length of the service list in this case.The court also notes that appellant’s September 9, 2021 and September 22, 2021 notices contain various personal attacks on various individuals and states opinions which are wholly irrelevant to this court’s review of the order on appeal - the April 29, 2021 order clarifying case status and directing the clerk of the lower tribunal to place the case in a reopen status. For example, in the September 9, 2021 notice, appellant, without substantiation, references alleged “nefarious attacks” against her and claims that “Clerks, deputy clerks and court tech” are using “computer programs/software/code/cyber-attacks as a weapon against litigants” in an effort to thwart her case. In the September 22, 2021 notice, in addition to appellant’s incorrect claim that this court’s earlier September 22, 2021 order did not contain the signature of the Clerk, appellant: (1) refers to personnel from this court and the lower tribunal clerk as “rogue”; (2) suggests that this court terminate, withhold the salary, and seize the assets of its personnel who acted pursuant to the court’s direction; (3) claims this court’s actions are a “tyrannical act of treason”; and (4) disparages, without justification, various personnel employed by the clerk of the lower tribunal. None of the foregoing has any relation or is directed to the merits of the circuit court’s entry of the order on appeal. Previously, in an October 31, 2019 motion filed in Case No. 4D19-2560, a prior case between the parties, appellant accused personnel of the lower tribunal clerk as performing “rogue and illegal actions” and “writing fake orders of deception,” and accused personnel of this court of manipulating court orders and “deceitfully attempting to pretend to the Honorable Judges of the Fourth District Court of Appeals.” Appellant’s actions and allegations are an abuse of the processes of the court and hinder the ability to resolve matters properly before the court.Therefore, appellant is warned that continued frivolous filings in this court may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition on pro se filing. See Johnson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Tr. Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller, 133 So. 3d 926, 927 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186–87 (Fla. 2006) (“Upon a thorough review of May’s filings in this Court, we conclude that May has abused the processes of the Court and has hindered the ability of this Court to properly resolve those matters that are properly before the Court.”). |
Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Supplemental Record |
Description | Supplemental Records ~ *PROPOSED* |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice ~ OF 4DCA CLERK'S UNSIGNED 'ORDER', FILED ON SEPT 22, 2021 **STRICKEN** |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the clerk of the lower tribunal is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the setup of a payment plan for the record on appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Motion To File Supplemental Record |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-21 |
Type | Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel |
Subtype | Motion for Appointment of Counsel |
Description | Motion for Appointment of Counsel |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-20 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the clerk of the lower tribunal is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the setup of a payment plan for the record on appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-20 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 8, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-09 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Filing |
Description | Notice of Filing ~ OF LOWER COURT INDIGENCY PAPERWORK FOR LITIGANT |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO TRANSFER RECORD ON APPEAL FROM LOWER TRIBUNAL |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-08-31 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice ~ OF INABILITY TO TRANSMIT RECORD ON APPEAL |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-08-03 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s July 30, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty (20) days from receipt of the index. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s August 2, 2021 motion for clarification of due date of initial brief is denied as moot. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-02 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion For Clarification |
Description | Motion For Clarification ~ OF DUE DATE FOR INITIAL BRIEF |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-07-30 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-07-20 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that the lower tribunal clerk’s July 15, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and the record on appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the current due date. The clerk of the lower tribunal may file the record on appeal in no more than five (5) PDF documents. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-15 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ AND TO TRANSMIT THE RECORD IN MULTIPLE VOLUMES |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836 |
Parties
Name | Christine Scott *P* |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal, JoAnn Nesta Burnett |
Name | Hon. John S. Kastrenakes |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-05-03 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion For Rehearing ~ ON ATTORNEY FEES |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-05-26 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
Description | ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that appellant's May 3, 2021 motion for rehearing is denied. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-20 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Order Granting Attorney Fees-Prevailing ~ ORDERED that appellee's February 26, 2021 motion for attorney's fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that appellee is the prevailing party and, if so, setting the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including but not limited to preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. |
Docket Date | 2021-03-29 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Dismissed - Order by Judge |
Docket Date | 2021-03-29 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Reply to Response |
Description | Reply to Response |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-03-18 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-03-08 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Jurisdictional Brief |
Description | Jurisdictional Brief |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-03-02 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED, upon consideration of appellee's response to appellant's jurisdictional statement, appellant is advised that this court did not receive appellant's jurisdictional statement. Accordingly, appellant shall file the jurisdictional statement with this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-03-01 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-02-26 |
Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-26 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT OF APPELLANT |
On Behalf Of | PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-16 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ ***CERTIFIED COPY*** |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-02-15 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2021-02-11 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ Indigent per 19-2817 |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-02-11 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | WV:Waived |
Docket Date | 2021-03-29 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 26, 2021 reply to response is stricken as unauthorized. FurtherUpon consideration of appellant’s March 8, 2021 jurisdictional brief and appellee’s March 18, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Collier, 405 So. 2d 311, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (an order granting a motion for final summary judgment is a final, appealable order only when the order contains unequivocal language of finality).LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Response re Jurisdiction |
Description | AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the January 13, 2021 "order on plaintiff, Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc.'s amended motion for summary final judgment and/or to determine case is moot and for award of prevailing party attorney's fees and cost" is an appealable final order as it merely grants a motion for summary judgment and it appears judicial labor remains. See Rust v. Brown, 13 So. 3d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("An order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party."); see also S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974) (“Generally, the test employed by the appellate court to determine finality of an order, judgment or decree is whether the order in question constitutes an end to the judicial labor in the cause, and nothing further remains to be done by the court to effectuate a termination of the cause as between the parties directly affected.”); furtherAppellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement. |
Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836 |
Parties
Name | Christine Scott *P* |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | JoAnn Nesta Burnett |
Name | Hon. John S. Kastrenakes |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-02-03 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to appellant’s February 2, 2021 motion to withdraw notice of appeal, this case is dismissed. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-03 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Dismissed - Order by Clerk |
Docket Date | 2021-02-02 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal |
Description | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ (MOTION TO WITHDRAW NOTICE OF APPEAL) |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-01-26 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Response re Jurisdiction |
Description | AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the January 13, 2021 "order on plaintiff, Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc.'s amended motion for summary final judgment and/or to determine case is moot and for award of prevailing party attorney's fees and cost" is an appealable final order as it merely grants a motion for summary judgment and it appears judicial labor remains. See Rust v. Brown, 13 So. 3d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("An order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party."); see also S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974) (“Generally, the test employed by the appellate court to determine finality of an order, judgment or decree is whether the order in question constitutes an end to the judicial labor in the cause, and nothing further remains to be done by the court to effectuate a termination of the cause as between the parties directly affected.”); furtherAppellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement. |
Docket Date | 2021-01-26 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2021-01-25 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-01-25 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | WV:Waived |
Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836 |
Parties
Name | Christine Scott *P* |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | PIN-GRO-VIL INC |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Representations | JoAnn Nesta Burnett |
Name | Hon. John S. Kastrenakes |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-02-11 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Prohib. ~ ORDERED that the January 24, 2021 petition for writ of prohibition is denied.LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-11 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Denied - Order by Judge |
Docket Date | 2021-01-25 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter |
Docket Date | 2021-01-25 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix to Petition |
Description | Appendix to Petition |
Docket Date | 2021-01-25 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
Description | ORD-L.T. INSOLVENCY OR INDIGE. |
Docket Date | 2021-01-24 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Prohibition |
Description | Petition Prohibition |
On Behalf Of | Christine Scott *P* |
Docket Date | 2021-01-24 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | WV:Waived |
Name | Date |
---|---|
Reg. Agent Change | 2024-08-22 |
AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT | 2024-05-02 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2024-02-06 |
AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT | 2023-12-16 |
AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT | 2023-04-11 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2023-01-26 |
Reg. Agent Resignation | 2022-12-20 |
AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT | 2022-12-08 |
Reg. Agent Change | 2022-07-25 |
AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT | 2022-07-15 |
Date of last update: 01 Jun 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State