Home Page
Counties
Hillsborough
33629
KRISTIN WILSON, LLC

KRISTIN WILSON, LLC

Company Details

Entity Name:	KRISTIN WILSON, LLC
Jurisdiction:	FLORIDA
Filing Type:	Florida Limited Liability Company
Status:	Active
Date Filed:	13 Feb 2019 (6 years ago)
Document Number:	L19000043644
FEI/EIN Number	83-3974938
Address:	3620 S. Lightner Drive, Tampa, FL 33629
Mail Address:	3620 S. Lightner Drive, Tampa, FL 33629
ZIP code:	33629
County:	Hillsborough
Place of Formation:	FLORIDA

Agent

Name	Role	Address
WATERCUTTER, KRISTIN W	Agent	3620 S. Lightner Drive, Tampa, FL 33629

Manager

Name	Role	Address
Watercutter, Kristin W	Manager	3620 S. Lightner Drive, Tampa, FL 33629

Fictitious Names

Registration Number	Fictitious Name	Status	Filed Date	Expiration Date	Cancellation Date	Mailing Address
G22000132522	KW DESIGN	ACTIVE	2022-10-24	2027-12-31	No data	3620 S. LIGHTNER DR, TAMPA, FL, 33629

Events

Event Type	Filed Date	Value	Description
REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED	2024-04-30	WATERCUTTER, KRISTIN W	No data
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS	2021-07-27	3620 S. Lightner Drive, Tampa, FL 33629	No data
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS	2021-07-27	3620 S. Lightner Drive, Tampa, FL 33629	No data
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED	2021-07-27	3620 S. Lightner Drive, Tampa, FL 33629	No data

Court Cases

Title

Case Number

Docket Date

Status

CHRISTINE SCOTT VS PIN-GRO-VIL, INC., et al.

4D2021-2734

2021-09-21

Closed

Classification	Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
Court	4th District Court of Appeal
Originating Court	Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836

Parties

Name	Christine Scott P
Role	Appellant
Status	Active

Name	Steven D. Moore
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Barbara Dawicke
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Joseph Ricker
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Connie Wolverton
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	John Stobar
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Russell Sweet
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Lois A. Spoo
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Angelica Cortez
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Robert Denning
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	BLAKE SMITH L.L.C.
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Drew Flynn
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Barbara E. Harrington
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Clyde Winn
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Hampton C. Peterson
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	KRISTIN WILSON, LLC
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Michael Doe
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Evan Gray
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Karina Rodriguez-Matzen
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Jamie Gauthier
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Janis Sustache
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Stephanie Patty
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	PIN-GRO-VIL INC
Role	Respondent
Status	Active
Representations	JoAnn Nesta Burnett, Richard P. Cole, Hampton C. Peterson, Jorge E. Torres-Puig, Stephen Nicholas Harber, Gary Charles Rosen, Hon. April Bristow

Name	Kathleen Savor
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Karla Guzman
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	David Hagadorn
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Lisa Spann
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Lourdes Gerstenberger
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Dorothy Flynn
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Joyce Vail
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	CINDY GUERRA, INC.
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Barbara Provalenko
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Denise M. Denning
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Adian Skipper
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Dick Harrington
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	John Paul Herman
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Isai Bonilla
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Lawrence Mitchler
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Miriam Ricker
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Adrian Ashton
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Marilyn Drumheiser
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Diane Hagadorn
Role	Respondent
Status	Active

Name	Hon. Cheryl A. Caracuzzo
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Hon. Glenn Kelley
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Hon. John S. Kastrenakes
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Hon. Renatha Francis
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Hon. Krista Marx
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Clerk - Palm Beach
Role	Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status	Active

Docket Entries

Docket Date	2021-10-06
Type	Disposition
Subtype	Denied
Description	Denied - Order by Judge

Docket Date	2021-09-23
Type	Petition
Subtype	Petition Mandamus
Description	Petition Mandamus / Acknowledgment letter

Docket Date	2021-09-21
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
Description	ORD-L.T. INSOLVENCY OR INDIGE.

Docket Date	2021-09-21
Type	Petition
Subtype	Petition Mandamus
Description	Petition Mandamus
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-10-06
Type	Disposition by Order
Subtype	Denied
Description	Order Denying Petition for Writ - Mandamus ~ ORDERED that this court determines that this proceeding is frivolous. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. The court reserves jurisdiction to impose sanctions. Petitioner has filed numerous frivolous pro se pleadings in this court and in the circuit court below. Accordingly, within ten (10) days of this order, petitioner shall file a response with this court and show cause why she should not be prohibited from further pro se filing in this court unless the document has been reviewed and signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar who certifies that a good faith basis exists for each claim presented. Johnson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller, 133 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 2006).GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Docket Date	9999-10-26
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Miscellaneous Docket Entry
Description	Miscellaneous (DNU) ~ PETITIONER IS PROHIBITED

Docket Date	2021-10-26
Type	Order
Subtype	Prohibited from Pro Se Filing
Description	PROHIBITED from further pro se filings ~ ORDERED that, having considered petitioner’s October 18, 2021 response to this court’s October 6, 2021 order to show cause, the court determines that sanctions are appropriate. Petitioner has filed numerous rambling and frivolous pro se documents in this court and in the proceedings below. Petitioner was recently cautioned against frivolous and abusive filing in this court’s September 28, 2021 order in case number 4D21-1747. The rambling and frivolous response to this court’s order to show cause convinces this court that sanctions are necessary. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to no longer accept petitioner’s pro se filings unless the document has been reviewed and signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar who certifies that a good faith basis exists for each claim presented. Johnson v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller,133 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 2006). Unless this court rules otherwise, petitioner may file pro se in case numbers 4D20-2220 and 4D21-1747, which were pending in this court when this sanction issued.

Docket Date	2021-10-18
Type	Response
Subtype	Response
Description	Response to Order to Show Cause
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

CHRISTINE SCOTT VS PIN-GRO-VIL, INC., et al.

4D2021-1747

2021-05-28

Closed

Classification	NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
Court	4th District Court of Appeal
Originating Court	Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836

Parties

Name	Christine Scott P
Role	Appellant
Status	Active

Name	Deborah J. Mitchler
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Miriam Ricker
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Diane Hagadorn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Barbara Provalenko
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	John Paul Herman
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lawrence Mitchler
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Isai Bonilla
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lois A. Spoo
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lourdes Gerstenberger
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Adrian Ashton
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Clyde Winn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Marilyn Drumheiser
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	BLAKE SMITH L.L.C.
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Jamie Gauthier
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Drew Flynn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Steven D. Moore
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Adian Skipper
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Hampton C. Peterson
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Karla Guzman
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Michael Doe
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	John Stobar
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Joseph Ricker
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Nancy Mathieu
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Barbara E. Harrington
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Denise M. Denning
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Angelica Cortez
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Evan Gray
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Connie Wolverton
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	David Hagadorn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	KRISTIN WILSON, LLC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Martinique Sanders
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Joyce Vail
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	PIN-GRO-VIL INC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active
Representations	Jorge E. Torres-Puig, Gary Charles Rosen, Therese Ann Savona, JoAnn Nesta Burnett, Hon. April Bristow, Lissette M. Gonzalez, Stephen Nicholas Harber, Richard P. Cole

Name	Janis Sustache
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Robert Denning
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Karina Rodriguez-Matzen
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Dorothy Flynn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Kathleen Savor
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	CINDY GUERRA, INC.
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Stephanie Patty
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Russell Sweet
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lisa Spann
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Barbara Dawicke
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Dick Harrington
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Samquisha Lane
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Hon. John S. Kastrenakes
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Hon. Glenn Kelley
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Hon. Edward L. Artau
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Hon. Cheryl A. Caracuzzo
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Clerk - Palm Beach
Role	Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status	Active

Docket Entries

Docket Date	2023-05-05
Type	Mandate
Subtype	Mandate
Description	Mandate

Docket Date	2023-04-19
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Rehearing
Description	ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 15, 2023 motion for rehearing, clarification, or written opinion is denied.

Docket Date	2023-04-12
Type	Response
Subtype	Response
Description	Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION OR WRITTEN OPINION
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2023-04-03
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
Description	Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc.'s March 30, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s March 15, 2023 motion for rehearing is extended ten (10) days from the date of this order.

Docket Date	2023-03-30
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
Description	Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2023-03-30
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Appearance
Description	Notice of Appearance
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2023-03-17
Type	Mandate
Subtype	Mandate
Description	Mandate ~ *VACATED SEE 3/17/23 ORDER*

Docket Date	2023-03-17
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	West Publishing
Description	West Publishing

Docket Date	2023-03-17
Type	Order
Subtype	Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
Description	Order Vacated ~ ORDERED that this court's March 17, 2023 mandate is vacated as issued in error.

Docket Date	2023-03-15
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time
Description	Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 13, 2023 motion for extension of time is denied. Appellant shall file any reply she wishes to submit on or before March 15, 2023, at 11:59 pm.

Docket Date	2023-03-15
Type	Post-Disposition Motions
Subtype	Motion for Rehearing
Description	Motion For Rehearing ~ Clarification or Written Opinion
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2023-03-13
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time
Description	Motion for Extension of Time
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2023-03-10
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time
Description	Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 9, 2023 motion for extension of time is denied. Appellant shall file any reply she wishes to submit within five (5) days of the date of this order.

Docket Date	2023-03-09
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time
Description	Motion for Extension of Time
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2023-02-09
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time
Description	Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO SUBMIT MOTION FOR REHEARING
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2023-02-09
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time
Description	Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s February 9, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant may file a motion for rehearing within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.

Docket Date	2023-01-26
Type	Disposition by Opinion
Subtype	Affirmed
Description	Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed

Docket Date	2023-01-26
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
Description	Order Granting Attorney Fees-Unconditionally ~ ORDERED that appellee Pin-Gro-Vil, Inc.’s July 25, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.

Docket Date	2022-10-24
Type	Order
Subtype	Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
Description	ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.

Docket Date	2022-08-31
Type	Motions Relating to Oral Argument
Subtype	Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description	Request for Oral Argument
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2022-07-25
Type	Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
Subtype	Motion For Attorney's Fees
Description	Motion For Attorney's Fees
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2022-07-25
Type	Brief
Subtype	Reply Brief
Description	Appellant's Reply Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2022-06-24
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description	ORD-Reply Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it will be subject to being stricken, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the reply brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant.

Docket Date	2022-06-14
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2022-05-18
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description	Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s May 17, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.

Docket Date	2022-05-17
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2022-04-18
Type	Brief
Subtype	Answer Brief
Description	Appellee's Answer Brief
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2021-06-30
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 29, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the current due date. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.

Docket Date	2022-03-18
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description	ORD-Answer Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellees’ March 11, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein will foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellees are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the answer brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.

Docket Date	2022-03-11
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2022-02-09
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description	Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee’s February 3, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.

Docket Date	2022-02-03
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2022-01-04
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description	Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees’ December 27, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.

Docket Date	2021-12-27
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2021-12-14
Type	Record
Subtype	Record on Appeal
Description	Received Records ~ VOLUME 3a (PAGES 96,082-124,159)
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

Docket Date	2021-06-07
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
Description	Determination of Indigent Status
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

Docket Date	2021-06-02
Type	Motions Other
Subtype	Miscellaneous Motion
Description	Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO SERVE JUDGE KASTENAKES AS PARTY
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-06-02
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Appeal
Description	Notice of Appeal Filed
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

Docket Date	2021-06-01
Type	Letter
Subtype	Acknowledgment Letter
Description	Acknowledgment Letter

Docket Date	2021-05-28
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Appeal
Description	Notice of Appeal Filed ~ Indigent per 19-2817
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-05-28
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Fee Status
Description	WV:Waived

Docket Date	2021-12-10
Type	Order
Subtype	Order
Description	Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 “motion for rehearing on payment plan” is granted and the portion of this court’s November 1, 2021 order directing appellant to enter into a payment plan with the clerk of the lower court is vacated. The clerk is directed to file the record on appeal with this Court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. See § 57.082(6), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“A case may not be impeded in any way, delayed in filing, or delayed in its progress, including the final hearing and order, due to nonpayment of any fees or costs by an indigent person.”). This ruling is without prejudice to the clerk pursuing any remedies available pursuant to section 28.246, Florida Statutes (2021), for payment, as the indigent party is required to pay for services of the clerk in preparation of the record. Section 57.081, Florida Statutes (2021), does not provide that the services of the court are provided without cost to the indigent party. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 “motion for rehearing on appointment for counsel” is denied. See § 27.511(a), Fla. Stat. (2021) (listing the civil actions where a party is entitled to court appointed counsel); Bova v. State, 410 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 1982) (“Right-to-counsel protections do not extend to civil parties or witnesses . . .”); Onett v. Ahola, 780 So. 2d 979, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“There is no absolute right to counsel in a civil proceeding.”). Further,ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 emergency motion for continuance is denied.

Docket Date	2021-12-08
Type	Motions Other
Subtype	Miscellaneous Motion
Description	Miscellaneous Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-12-08
Type	Post-Disposition Motions
Subtype	Motion for Rehearing
Description	Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ ON PAYMENT PLAN
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-11-23
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description	Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees’ November 15, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.

Docket Date	2021-11-22
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Status Report
Description	Status Report
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

Docket Date	2021-11-16
Type	Order
Subtype	Order to File Status Report
Description	Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, the clerk of the lower tribunal shall file a status report which indicates whether appellant entered into the payment plan as required by this court’s November 1, 2021 order.

Docket Date	2021-11-15
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2021-06-29
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-06-15
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Appearance
Description	Notice of Appearance
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2021-06-07
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Miscellaneous Motion
Description	Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 2, 2021 “motion to serve . . .” is denied. Appellant did not file a petition for writ of prohibition in this case, but instead seeks review of the April 29, 2021 order clarifying case status and directing the clerk to place the case in a reopen status.

Docket Date	2021-11-01
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion to Supplement Record
Description	Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 8, 2021 motion to transfer record on appeal from lower court is denied. Appellant shall enter into a payment plan with the clerk of the lower tribunal within seven (7) from the date of this order. Failure to enter into a payment plan as provided in this order will result in dismissal of this appeal. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s September 21, 2021 motion to appoint counsel is denied as a party to a civil action is not guaranteed the right to counsel. See Bova v. State, 410 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 1982) (“Right-to-counsel protections do not extend to civil parties or witnesses . . .”); Onett v. Ahola, 780 So. 2d 979, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“There is no absolute right to counsel in a civil proceeding.”). Further, ORDERED that appellant’s September 22, 2021 motion to file supplemental record is denied. See Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 534 So. 2d 754, 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Docket Date	2021-10-15
Type	Brief
Subtype	Initial Brief
Description	Initial Brief on Merits
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-30
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Status Report
Description	Status Report
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

Docket Date	2021-09-28
Type	Order
Subtype	Order Striking Filing
Description	ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 22, 2021 notice is stricken as unauthorized. Appellant is advised that, as is the case for all appellate courts in the State of Florida, all orders issued by this court contain the signature of the Clerk. This court’s September 22, 2021 order contains the signature of the Clerk on the second page of the order, which was necessitated by the length of the service list in this case.The court also notes that appellant’s September 9, 2021 and September 22, 2021 notices contain various personal attacks on various individuals and states opinions which are wholly irrelevant to this court’s review of the order on appeal - the April 29, 2021 order clarifying case status and directing the clerk of the lower tribunal to place the case in a reopen status. For example, in the September 9, 2021 notice, appellant, without substantiation, references alleged “nefarious attacks” against her and claims that “Clerks, deputy clerks and court tech” are using “computer programs/software/code/cyber-attacks as a weapon against litigants” in an effort to thwart her case. In the September 22, 2021 notice, in addition to appellant’s incorrect claim that this court’s earlier September 22, 2021 order did not contain the signature of the Clerk, appellant: (1) refers to personnel from this court and the lower tribunal clerk as “rogue”; (2) suggests that this court terminate, withhold the salary, and seize the assets of its personnel who acted pursuant to the court’s direction; (3) claims this court’s actions are a “tyrannical act of treason”; and (4) disparages, without justification, various personnel employed by the clerk of the lower tribunal. None of the foregoing has any relation or is directed to the merits of the circuit court’s entry of the order on appeal. Previously, in an October 31, 2019 motion filed in Case No. 4D19-2560, a prior case between the parties, appellant accused personnel of the lower tribunal clerk as performing “rogue and illegal actions” and “writing fake orders of deception,” and accused personnel of this court of manipulating court orders and “deceitfully attempting to pretend to the Honorable Judges of the Fourth District Court of Appeals.” Appellant’s actions and allegations are an abuse of the processes of the court and hinder the ability to resolve matters properly before the court.Therefore, appellant is warned that continued frivolous filings in this court may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition on pro se filing. See Johnson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Tr. Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller, 133 So. 3d 926, 927 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186–87 (Fla. 2006) (“Upon a thorough review of May’s filings in this Court, we conclude that May has abused the processes of the Court and has hindered the ability of this Court to properly resolve those matters that are properly before the Court.”).

Docket Date	2021-09-22
Type	Record
Subtype	Supplemental Record
Description	Supplemental Records ~ PROPOSED
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-22
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice
Description	Notice ~ OF 4DCA CLERK'S UNSIGNED 'ORDER', FILED ON SEPT 22, 2021 STRICKEN
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-22
Type	Order
Subtype	Order to File Status Report
Description	Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the clerk of the lower tribunal is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the setup of a payment plan for the record on appeal.

Docket Date	2021-09-22
Type	Motions Relating to Records
Subtype	Motion to Supplement Record
Description	Motion To File Supplemental Record
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-21
Type	Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
Subtype	Motion for Appointment of Counsel
Description	Motion for Appointment of Counsel
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-20
Type	Order
Subtype	Order to File Status Report
Description	Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the clerk of the lower tribunal is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the setup of a payment plan for the record on appeal.

Docket Date	2021-09-20
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice
Description	Notice
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-15
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 8, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.

Docket Date	2021-09-09
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice
Description	Notice
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-08
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-08
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Filing
Description	Notice of Filing ~ OF LOWER COURT INDIGENCY PAPERWORK FOR LITIGANT
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-09-08
Type	Motions Other
Subtype	Miscellaneous Motion
Description	Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO TRANSFER RECORD ON APPEAL FROM LOWER TRIBUNAL
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-08-31
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice
Description	Notice ~ OF INABILITY TO TRANSMIT RECORD ON APPEAL
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

Docket Date	2021-08-03
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s July 30, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty (20) days from receipt of the index. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s August 2, 2021 motion for clarification of due date of initial brief is denied as moot.

Docket Date	2021-08-02
Type	Post-Disposition Motions
Subtype	Motion For Clarification
Description	Motion For Clarification ~ OF DUE DATE FOR INITIAL BRIEF
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-07-30
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2021-07-20
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time
Description	Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that the lower tribunal clerk’s July 15, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and the record on appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the current due date. The clerk of the lower tribunal may file the record on appeal in no more than five (5) PDF documents.

Docket Date	2021-07-15
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time
Description	Motion for Extension of Time ~ AND TO TRANSMIT THE RECORD IN MULTIPLE VOLUMES
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

CHRISTINE SCOTT VS PIN-GRO-VIL, INC.

4D2019-3191

2019-09-09

Closed

Classification	NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
Court	4th District Court of Appeal
Originating Court	Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836

Parties

Name	Christine Scott P
Role	Appellant
Status	Active

Name	Clyde Winn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Robert Denning
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Karina Rodriguez-Matzen
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Adrian Ashton
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	David Hagadorn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Kathleen Savor
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Denise M. Denning
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	BLAKE SMITH L.L.C.
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	KRISTIN WILSON, LLC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Joyce Vail
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	CINDY GUERRA, INC.
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Connie Wolverton
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Deborah J. Mitchler
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Steven D. Moore
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Dick Harrington
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Jamie Gauthier
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Russell Sweet
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lawrence Mitchler
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	PIN-GRO-VIL INC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active
Representations	Gary Charles Rosen, Hampton C. Peterson, Therese Ann Savona, Stephen Nicholas Harber, Jorge E. Torres-Puig, Richard P. Cole, Hon. April Bristow, JoAnn Nesta Burnett

Name	Nancy Mathieu
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Margaret L. Scott
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Joseph Ricker
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Drew Flynn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Barbara Provalenko
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Karla Guzman
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Miriam Ricker
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lois A. Spoo
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Samquisha Lane
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Martinique Sanders
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	John Paul Herman
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Dorothy Flynn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Adian Skipper
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Isai Bonilla
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Angelica Cortez
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Michael Doe
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Marilyn Drumheiser
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lisa Spann
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Barbara E. Harrington
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	John Stobar
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Diane Hagadorn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Hon. John S. Kastrenakes
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Clerk - Palm Beach
Role	Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status	Active

Docket Entries

Docket Date	2019-12-09
Type	Disposition by Order
Subtype	Dismissed
Description	ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that appellant’s November 27, 2019 “request for leave of court to file a rebuttal to response to jurisdictional brief/rebuttal to jurisdictional brief” is denied. Further,Upon consideration of appellant’s November 18, 2019 jurisdictional statement and appellees’ November 26, 2019 response, it is ORDERED that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Bolera v. Papa, 142 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle Nat’l Bank, 868 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Further,ORDERED that appellant’s November 7, 2019 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is denied as moot. Further,ORDERED that the clerk & comptroller’s November 8, 2019 “request of clerk & comptroller” is denied as moot.TAYLOR, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

Docket Date	2019-12-09
Type	Disposition
Subtype	Dismissed
Description	Dismissed - Order by Judge

Docket Date	2019-11-27
Type	Motions Other
Subtype	Motion for Leave to File Reply
Description	Motion for leave to file reply
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2019-11-26
Type	Response
Subtype	Response
Description	Response ~ TO STATEMENT FOR BASIS OF JURISDICTION
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2019-11-18
Type	Brief
Subtype	Jurisdictional Brief
Description	Jurisdictional Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2019-11-14
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Appearance
Description	Notice of Appearance
On Behalf Of	PIN-GRO-VIL, Inc.

Docket Date	2019-11-12
Type	Order
Subtype	Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
Description	AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date of this order appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the order granting appellee's motion to strike affirmative defenses with prejudice is an appealable order. See Bolera v. Papa, 142 So. 3d 918 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding that the portions of the order striking appellant's answer and affirmative defenses were nonfinal and nonappealable); Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle Nat. Bank, 868 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ("As to the order striking defenses and the discovery order, this Court is without jurisdiction because the orders are non-final, non-appealable orders."). Further, Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.

Docket Date	2019-11-08
Type	Motions Other
Subtype	Miscellaneous Motion
Description	Miscellaneous Motion
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

Docket Date	2019-11-07
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2019-10-17
Type	Letter
Subtype	Acknowledgment Letter
Description	Acknowledgment Letter

Docket Date	2019-09-09
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Appeal
Description	Notice of Appeal Filed
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2019-09-09
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Fee Status
Description	WV:Waived

CHRISTINE SCOTT VS MARILYNN DRUMHEISER, et al.

4D2019-2785

2019-09-05

Closed

Classification	NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
Court	4th District Court of Appeal
Originating Court	Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502018CA010836XXXXMB

Parties

Name	Christine Scott P
Role	Appellant
Status	Active

Name	Cole Scott and Kissane, P.A.
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Adrian Ashton
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Carole Bleecker
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	DON MARTIN, INC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	PBCGOV.ORG Tech Team
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Robert Denning
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Martinique Sanders
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	John Paul Herman
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lois A. Spoo
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Jamie Gauthier
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	MAN, THREAT MINI VAN
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Stephen Nicholas Harber
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	David Hagadorn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Richard P. Cole
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	DAVID AND MATHIEU LLC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	CINDY GUERRA, INC.
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Angelica Cortez
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Drew Flynn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Barbara Dawicke
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lisa Spann
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Margaret L. Scott
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Isai Bonilla
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Jorge E. Torres-Puig
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Evan Gray
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Russell Sweet
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	BLAKE SMITH L.L.C.
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	JOHN DOE - TALL SLENDER MAN
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Adian Skipper
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Joyce Vail
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Andrew Doe
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Dorothy Flynn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Barbara E. Harrington
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Karina Rodriguez-Matzen
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Becker Lawyers
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	MALE TRESPASSER
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	FEMALE TRESPASSER
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Barbara Provalenko
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Marilyn Drumheiser
Role	Appellee
Status	Active
Representations	Hon. April Bristow, Therese Ann Savona

Name	THE CHARLES BRYANT CORPORATION
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Rayez Ali
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Michael Doe
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	JoAnn Nesta Burnett
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Joseph Ricker
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Connie Wolverton
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Deborah J. Mitchler
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Nancy Mathieu
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Diane Hagadorn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Stephanie Patty
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	John Stobar
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Karla Guzman
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	FEMALE DOE
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Dennis Ricker
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lawrence Mitchler
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Samquisha Lane
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	KRISTIN WILSON, LLC
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Bill Doe
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Gary Charles Rosen
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Hampton C. Peterson
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Denise M. Denning
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	CAROLYN BODMAN
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Lourdes Gerstenberger
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Clyde Winn
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Miriam Ricker
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Janis Sustache
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Kathleen Savor
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Sharon R. Bock, Clerk and Comptroller
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Dave Armstrong
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Steven D. Moore
Role	Appellee
Status	Active

Name	Hon. John S. Kastrenakes
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active

Name	Clerk - Palm Beach
Role	Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status	Active

Docket Entries

Docket Date	2020-03-18
Type	Disposition
Subtype	Dismissed
Description	Dismissed - Order by Clerk

Docket Date	9999-12-03
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Miscellaneous Docket Entry
Description	Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ *APPENDIX TO BE FILED IN LIEU OF RECORD, SEE 12/3/19 ORDER.*

Docket Date	2020-03-18
Type	Disposition by Order
Subtype	Dismissed
Description	ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Docket Date	2020-02-26
Type	Order
Subtype	Show Cause
Description	Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before March 9, 2020, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.

Docket Date	2019-12-17
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion To Compel
Description	Order Denying Motion to Compel ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 9, 2019 "motion to enforce duties of clerk, pursuant to F. R. App. P. Rule 9.200(e)" is denied. See this court's December 3, 2019 order; further,ORDERED that appellant's December 9, 2019 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief and appendix on or before February 18, 2020. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.

Docket Date	2019-12-09
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2019-12-09
Type	Motions Other
Subtype	Motion To Compel
Description	Motion To Compel ~ "MOTION TO ENFORCE DUTIES OF CLERK, PURSUANT F. R. APP. P. RULE 9.200(e)"
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2019-12-03
Type	Order
Subtype	Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellant’s November 14, 2019 response, it is ORDERED that the initial brief shall be accompanied by an appendix in lieu of the transmittal of the record on appeal in the above-styled appeal. All requested relief in appellant’s response is denied. Further,ORDERED that the clerk of the lower tribunal’s November 8, 2019 request is determined to be moot. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall not transmit a record on appeal unless ordered by this court. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s November 7, 2019 motion for extension of time to submit brief is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief and accompanying appendix on or before December 18, 2019. In addition, if the initial brief and appendix are not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.

Docket Date	2019-11-14
Type	Response
Subtype	Response
Description	Response
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2019-11-12
Type	Order
Subtype	Order to Show Cause
Description	Order to Show Cause ~ Upon consideration of the clerk of the lower tribunal's November 8, 2019 request, it is ORDERED that appellant is directed to show cause, within five (5) days from the date of this order, why the initial brief should not be accompanied by an appendix in lieu of the transmittal of the record on appeal in the above-styled case. Appellee may file a response within five (5) days thereafter.

Docket Date	2019-11-08
Type	Motions Other
Subtype	Miscellaneous Motion
Description	Miscellaneous Motion
On Behalf Of	Clerk - Palm Beach

Docket Date	2019-11-07
Type	Motions Extensions
Subtype	Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description	Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Docket Date	2019-09-16
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Appearance
Description	Notice of Appearance
On Behalf Of	Marilyn Drumheiser

Docket Date	2019-09-09
Type	Letter
Subtype	Acknowledgment Letter
Description	Acknowledgment Letter

Docket Date	2019-09-05
Type	Misc. Events
Subtype	Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
Description	Determination of Indigent Status

Docket Date	2019-09-05
Type	Notice
Subtype	Notice of Appeal
Description	Notice of Appeal Filed
On Behalf Of	Christine Scott P

Documents

Name	Date
ANNUAL REPORT	2024-04-30
ANNUAL REPORT	2023-04-03
ANNUAL REPORT	2022-07-15
ANNUAL REPORT	2021-07-27
ANNUAL REPORT	2020-03-17
Florida Limited Liability	2019-02-13

Date of last update: 17 Jan 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State

KRISTIN WILSON, LLC

Company Details

Agent

Manager

Fictitious Names

Events

Court Cases

Documents

Related by officers

Related by address