Search icon

NAPLES SUPERMARKET CORP

Company Details

Entity Name: NAPLES SUPERMARKET CORP
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Florida Profit Corporation
Status: Active
Date Filed: 21 Aug 2019 (5 years ago)
Document Number: P19000067283
FEI/EIN Number 84-2906069
Address: 50 WILSON BLVD S, NAPLES, FL 34117
Mail Address: 50 WILSON BLVD S, NAPLES, FL 34117
ZIP code: 34117
County: Collier
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Agent

Name Role
BUSINESS PLUS TAX SOLUTIONS INC Agent

President

Name Role Address
CAZOLA, RAMIRO President 102 DORAL CIRCLE, NAPLES, FL 34113

Secretary

Name Role Address
CAZOLA, RAMIRO Secretary 102 DORAL CIRCLE, NAPLES, FL 34113

Treasurer

Name Role Address
BORDON, RICARDO Treasurer 4924 20TH PL SW, NAPLES, FL 34116

Fictitious Names

Registration Number Fictitious Name Status Filed Date Expiration Date Cancellation Date Mailing Address
G21000024126 BRAVO SUPERMARKET ACTIVE 2021-02-19 2026-12-31 No data 50 WILSON BLVD S, NAPLES, FL, 34117
G20000100680 ULTRA SUPERMARKET ACTIVE 2020-08-08 2025-12-31 No data 50 WILSON BLVD S, NAPLES, FL, 34117

Court Cases

Title Case Number Docket Date Status
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC. VS CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC AND NAPLES SUPERMARKET CORP. 2D2021-2580 2021-08-20 Closed
Classification NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
Court 2nd District Court of Appeal
Originating Court Circuit Court for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County
2019-CA-003992-000I-XX

Parties

Name NASMIN ENTERPRISE INC.
Role Appellant
Status Active
Representations JOHN A. ANTHONY, ESQ., STEPHENIE B. ANTHONY, ESQ., JOHN W. LANDKAMMER, ESQ., TOWNSEND J. BELT, ESQ.
Name NAPLES SUPERMARKET CORP
Role Appellee
Status Active
Name CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Role Appellee
Status Active
Representations JOSEPH H. BROWN, ESQ., STEVEN V. BLOUNT, ESQ., DAVID P. FRASER, ESQ.
Name HONORABLE ELIZABETH V. KRIER
Role Judge/Judicial Officer
Status Active
Name COLLIER CLERK
Role Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status Active

Docket Entries

Docket Date 2021-12-01
Type Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
Subtype Motion For Attorney's Fees
Description Motion For Attorney's Fees
On Behalf Of CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Docket Date 2021-11-22
Type Brief
Subtype Initial Brief
Description Initial Appellant Brief on Merits
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2021-10-29
Type Record
Subtype Supplemental Record
Description Supplemental Records ~ REDACTED - 62 PAGES
Docket Date 2022-05-06
Type Misc. Events
Subtype West Publishing
Description West Publishing
Docket Date 2022-05-06
Type Mandate
Subtype Mandate
Description Mandate
Docket Date 2022-04-20
Type Disposition by Opinion
Subtype Affirmed
Description Affirmed - Per Curiam Opinion ~ in part; dismissed in part.
Docket Date 2022-04-20
Type Order
Subtype Order
Description Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant Nasmin Enterprise, Inc. moves for appellate attorney's fees against Carlisle/Wilson Plaza, LLC pursuant to a prevailing party provision in article 16.8 of their lease agreement. The motion is denied.Appellee Carlisle/Wilson Plaza, LLC also moves for appellate attorney's fees pursuant to the prevailing party provision in the lease agreement. The motion is provisionally granted, contingent upon Carlisle/Wilson Plaza ultimately prevailing below. If Carlisle/Wilson Plaza ultimately prevails, the trial court is authorized to award it all of the reasonable appellate attorney's fees incurred. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.400(b).Appellee Naples Supermarket Corporation moves for appellate attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Fla. Stat. (2021). The motion for appellate fees as a sanction is denied. Appellant Nasmin Enterprise, Inc's response to the motion is noted.
Docket Date 2022-01-07
Type Brief
Subtype Reply Brief
Description Appellant Reply Brief
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2022-03-23
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Oral Argument Date Set
Description Oral Argument Date Set ~ Remote
Docket Date 2022-01-21
Type Order
Subtype Order
Description ORD-SUA SPONTE ~ The court, on its own motion, has scheduled oral argument in this case by video.Appellee Carlisle/Wilson Plaza, LLC's request for video oral argument is denied as moot. Appellant Nasmin Enterprise, Inc.'s objection to video oral argument is denied. The video oral argument currently set for March 23, 2022, will proceed as scheduled.
Docket Date 2022-01-13
Type Order
Subtype Order Re: Video Oral Argument
Description OA Notice Video ~ This case is provisionally set for oral argument on WEDNESDAY, MARCH 23, 2022, at 9:30 A.M., before: Judge Stevan T. Northcutt, Judge Darryl C. Casanueva, Judge Susan H. Rothstein-Youakim. The oral argument will be conducted by video conference. The court calendars can be viewed on this court’s website at www.2dca.org. Counsel or parties are requested to sign in by fifteen minutes prior to the time listed above.The panel is subject to change without notice. Should the assigned panel of judges decide that the court will not benefit from oral argument, the attorneys or parties will be notified by order no less than two weeks before the scheduled date. If this is a criminal proceeding where a victim, as defined in article I, section 16(e), Florida Constitution, has invoked their right to notice under article I, section 16(b)(6), the State is directed to provide the victim with notice of this oral argument and of any changes to the scheduled date.Please review the notice regarding oral argument in the Second District Court of Appeal. A copy has been furnished with this order and may also be found on this court’s website.Within ten days from the date of this order, any attorney or party who will be presenting argument is requested to provide the Clerk of the Court with the email address where the video invitation should be sent and a telephone number. This information may be sent by email to 2dcaClerk@flcourts.org. The Clerk of the Court will provide each participant with connection instructions, including the opportunity for a test session, before the argument.
Docket Date 2022-01-07
Type Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
Subtype Motion For Attorney's Fees
Description Motion For Attorney's Fees
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2022-01-04
Type Response
Subtype Response
Description RESPONSE ~ APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE NAPLES SUPERMARKET CORP'SMOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES ON APPEAL
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2021-12-29
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served by January 7, 2022.
Docket Date 2021-12-13
Type Motions Extensions
Subtype Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOREXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2021-12-10
Type Response
Subtype Objection
Description OBJECTION ~ APPELLANT'S OBJECTION TO REQUEST FOR VIDEO ORAL ARGUMENT
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2021-12-10
Type Record
Subtype Appendix to Response
Description APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ APPELLANT'S APPENDIX TO APPELLANT'S OBJECTION TOREQUEST FOR VIDEO ORAL ARGUMENT
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2021-12-07
Type Motions Relating to Oral Argument
Subtype Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description Request for Oral Argument
On Behalf Of CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Docket Date 2021-12-07
Type Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
Subtype Motion For Attorney's Fees
Description Motion For Attorney's Fees
On Behalf Of CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Docket Date 2021-12-07
Type Brief
Subtype Answer Brief
Description Appellee Answer Brief ~ APPELLEE CARLISLE WILSON PLAZA'S ANSWER BRIEF
On Behalf Of CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Docket Date 2021-12-02
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description Amended OA Request Permitted ~ A request for oral argument has been filed in this case. Within five days from the date of this order, any party may file a request that the argument be conducted by video. The manner of oral argument will be decided in the court's discretion. A video request must state the reason in support, and it must indicate that the requesting party has consulted opposing counsel and is authorized to represent that opposing counsel either has no objection or will file an objection. A party objecting to a request to conduct oral argument by video must file a response within five days after service of the request.
Docket Date 2021-12-01
Type Motions Relating to Oral Argument
Subtype Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description Request for Oral Argument
On Behalf Of CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Docket Date 2021-12-01
Type Brief
Subtype Answer Brief
Description Appellee Answer Brief
On Behalf Of CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Docket Date 2021-10-27
Type Order
Subtype Order
Description Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's unopposed motion to supplement the record is granted to the extent that the appellant shall make arrangements within three days with the clerk of lower tribunal for the supplementation of the record with the items mentioned in the motion, with the supplemental record to be filed in this court within fifteen days from the date of this order.Because the record must be supplemented through the clerk of the lower tribunal as just described, the copies of the record materials attached to the motion to supplement will not be considered by this court.The initial brief shall be served within twenty-five days from the date of this order.
Docket Date 2021-10-26
Type Motions Relating to Records
Subtype Motion to Supplement Record
Description Motion Supplem/Record with/Attached ~ APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSEDMOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2021-09-23
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion To Dismiss
Description ORD-DENYING APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS ~ Appellee Naples Supermarket Corp.'s motion to dismiss the above appeal is denied.
Docket Date 2021-09-17
Type Record
Subtype Record on Appeal
Description Received Records ~ KRIER - 1253 PAGES
Docket Date 2021-09-08
Type Response
Subtype Response
Description RESPONSE ~ TO APPELLEE NAPLES SUPERMARKET CORP'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2021-08-24
Type Record
Subtype Appendix to Motion
Description ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT
On Behalf Of CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Docket Date 2021-08-24
Type Motions Other
Subtype Motion To Dismiss
Description Motion To Dismiss ~ Naples Supermarket Corp.MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
On Behalf Of CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
Docket Date 2021-08-20
Type Letter
Subtype Acknowledgment Letter
Description Acknowledgment Letter 1
Docket Date 2021-08-20
Type Order
Subtype Order on Filing Fee
Description fee - civil; atty
Docket Date 2021-08-20
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Appeal
Description Notice of Appeal Filed ~ WITH ORDER
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
Docket Date 2021-08-20
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
Description Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
On Behalf Of NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2024-04-25
ANNUAL REPORT 2023-03-01
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-02-08
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-01-20
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-06-18
Domestic Profit 2019-08-21

Date of last update: 16 Jan 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State