Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
On Behalf Of |
CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-11-22
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Appellant Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-29
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
Description |
Supplemental Records ~ REDACTED - 62 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-06
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-06
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-20
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed
|
Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Opinion ~ in part; dismissed in part.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant Nasmin Enterprise, Inc. moves for appellate attorney's fees against Carlisle/Wilson Plaza, LLC pursuant to a prevailing party provision in article 16.8 of their lease agreement. The motion is denied.Appellee Carlisle/Wilson Plaza, LLC also moves for appellate attorney's fees pursuant to the prevailing party provision in the lease agreement. The motion is provisionally granted, contingent upon Carlisle/Wilson Plaza ultimately prevailing below. If Carlisle/Wilson Plaza ultimately prevails, the trial court is authorized to award it all of the reasonable appellate attorney's fees incurred. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.400(b).Appellee Naples Supermarket Corporation moves for appellate attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Fla. Stat. (2021). The motion for appellate fees as a sanction is denied. Appellant Nasmin Enterprise, Inc's response to the motion is noted.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
Description |
Appellant Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-23
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Oral Argument Date Set
|
Description |
Oral Argument Date Set ~ Remote
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-21
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
ORD-SUA SPONTE ~ The court, on its own motion, has scheduled oral argument in this case by video.Appellee Carlisle/Wilson Plaza, LLC's request for video oral argument is denied as moot. Appellant Nasmin Enterprise, Inc.'s objection to video oral argument is denied. The video oral argument currently set for March 23, 2022, will proceed as scheduled.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-13
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Re: Video Oral Argument
|
Description |
OA Notice Video ~ This case is provisionally set for oral argument on WEDNESDAY, MARCH 23, 2022, at 9:30 A.M., before: Judge Stevan T. Northcutt, Judge Darryl C. Casanueva, Judge Susan H. Rothstein-Youakim. The oral argument will be conducted by video conference. The court calendars can be viewed on this court’s website at www.2dca.org. Counsel or parties are requested to sign in by fifteen minutes prior to the time listed above.The panel is subject to change without notice. Should the assigned panel of judges decide that the court will not benefit from oral argument, the attorneys or parties will be notified by order no less than two weeks before the scheduled date. If this is a criminal proceeding where a victim, as defined in article I, section 16(e), Florida Constitution, has invoked their right to notice under article I, section 16(b)(6), the State is directed to provide the victim with notice of this oral argument and of any changes to the scheduled date.Please review the notice regarding oral argument in the Second District Court of Appeal. A copy has been furnished with this order and may also be found on this court’s website.Within ten days from the date of this order, any attorney or party who will be presenting argument is requested to provide the Clerk of the Court with the email address where the video invitation should be sent and a telephone number. This information may be sent by email to 2dcaClerk@flcourts.org. The Clerk of the Court will provide each participant with connection instructions, including the opportunity for a test session, before the argument.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-04
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE NAPLES SUPERMARKET CORP'SMOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES ON APPEAL
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-29
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served by January 7, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOREXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-10
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Objection
|
Description |
OBJECTION ~ APPELLANT'S OBJECTION TO REQUEST FOR VIDEO ORAL ARGUMENT
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-10
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ APPELLANT'S APPENDIX TO APPELLANT'S OBJECTION TOREQUEST FOR VIDEO ORAL ARGUMENT
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-07
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-07
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
On Behalf Of |
CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-07
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee Answer Brief ~ APPELLEE CARLISLE WILSON PLAZA'S ANSWER BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-02
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Amended OA Request Permitted ~ A request for oral argument has been filed in this case. Within five days from the date of this order, any party may file a request that the argument be conducted by video. The manner of oral argument will be decided in the court's discretion. A video request must state the reason in support, and it must indicate that the requesting party has consulted opposing counsel and is authorized to represent that opposing counsel either has no objection or will file an objection. A party objecting to a request to conduct oral argument by video must file a response within five days after service of the request.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-27
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's unopposed motion to supplement the record is granted to the extent that the appellant shall make arrangements within three days with the clerk of lower tribunal for the supplementation of the record with the items mentioned in the motion, with the supplemental record to be filed in this court within fifteen days from the date of this order.Because the record must be supplemented through the clerk of the lower tribunal as just described, the copies of the record materials attached to the motion to supplement will not be considered by this court.The initial brief shall be served within twenty-five days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
Motion Supplem/Record with/Attached ~ APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSEDMOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-23
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
Description |
ORD-DENYING APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS ~ Appellee Naples Supermarket Corp.'s motion to dismiss the above appeal is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-17
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ KRIER - 1253 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-08
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ TO APPELLEE NAPLES SUPERMARKET CORP'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
Description |
ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT
|
On Behalf Of |
CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ Naples Supermarket Corp.MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
|
On Behalf Of |
CARLISLE/WILSON PLAZA, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-20
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
fee - civil; atty
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-20
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ WITH ORDER
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-20
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
NASMIN ENTERPRISE, INC.
|
|