346276637
|
0420600
|
2022-10-12
|
5291 POST OAK BLVD., WESLEY CHAPEL, FL, 33543
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2022-10-12
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2022-12-05
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1627704 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1627662 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
|
346210750
|
0420600
|
2022-09-10
|
1 WESLEY CHAPEL BLVD, WESLEY CHAPEL, FL, 33544
|
|
Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2022-09-10
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2022-11-01
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1623700 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
|
344632674
|
0420600
|
2020-02-13
|
1040 CHALET SUZANNE ROAD, LAKE WALES, FL, 33859
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2020-02-13
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2020-06-23
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1463268 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
1543164 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1463265 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 F07 |
Issuance Date |
2020-06-04 |
Current Penalty |
3562.2 |
Initial Penalty |
5937.0 |
Final Order |
2020-06-22 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. a) For sub-contracted employees working at the 3rd floor of building 2 in 1040 Chalet Suzanne Road in Lake Wales, as observed on or about 13 February, 2020.Sub-contracted employees were standing on a makeshift 2"x4" lumber scaffolding while doing wood framing on the balcony. Employees were exposed to an approximate fall height of up to 25 feet. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2020-06-04 |
Current Penalty |
3562.2 |
Initial Penalty |
5937.0 |
Final Order |
2020-06-22 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) For Sub-contracted employees working at 1040 Chalet Suzanne Road in Lake Wales, as observed on or about 13 February, 2020. Sub-contracted employees were observed installing roof framing and sheathing on a 4.5:12 pitch roof without the use of a personal fall arrest system, exposing to an approximate fall height of up to 30 feet. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260502 B02 I |
Issuance Date |
2020-06-04 |
Current Penalty |
2313.6 |
Initial Penalty |
3856.0 |
Final Order |
2020-06-22 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2)(i): Midrails, when used, were not installed at a height midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working level; screens and mesh, when used, did not extend from the top rail to the walking/working level and along the entire opening between top rail supports; Intermediate members, when used gbetween posts, were more than 19 inches (.5 m) apart; Other structural members were installed such that there are no openings in the guardrail system that are more than 19 inches (48 cm) wide. a) For Sub-contractor employees working at 1040 Chalet Suzanne Road in Lake Wales, as observed on or about 13 February, 2020. Sub-contractor employees were observed installing wall framing on the third floor balcony. The mid rail at the balcony was disconnected from one side and resting on the floor while sub-contracted employees were framing the wall on the third floor balcony, exposing to an approximate fall height of up to 21 feet |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19260502 D21 |
Issuance Date |
2020-06-04 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2020-06-22 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: a) For sub-contracted employees working at 1040 Chalet Suzanne Road in Lake Wales, as observed on or about 13 February, 2020. Subcontracted employees were observed using a personal fall arrest system in which the lifeline deceleration webbing was previously deployed and refolded using framing nails to hold it together, exposing to fall hazards. |
|
|
344428024
|
0420600
|
2019-11-05
|
9539 DELANEY CREEK BLVD, TAMPA, FL, 33619
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2019-11-05
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2020-11-13
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1442794 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1442798 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2020-05-01 |
Current Penalty |
9446.0 |
Initial Penalty |
9446.0 |
Final Order |
2020-05-29 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
13 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) For subcontracted employees working at 9539 Delaney Creek Blvd in Brandon, as observed on or about 5 November, 2019. Subcontractor employees were installing roof framing and sheathing on a 3:12 pitch roof of a 4-story building without the use of a fall protection system, exposing to fall height of up to 42 feet. |
|
|
343633731
|
0420600
|
2018-11-08
|
5320 WESTSHORE BLVD, TAMPA, FL, 33609
|
|
Inspection Type |
Referral
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2018-11-08
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: FORKLIFT
|
Case Closed |
2019-04-08
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1363385 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Referral |
Activity Nr |
1397949 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1384309 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
|
341857902
|
0420600
|
2016-10-18
|
6710 SOUTH FLORIDA AVENUE, LAKELAND, FL, 33813
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2016-10-18
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2017-08-08
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1185863 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1185884 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B11 |
Issuance Date |
2017-01-12 |
Current Penalty |
2993.04 |
Initial Penalty |
8730.0 |
Final Order |
2017-01-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) For sub contractor employees working at 6710 South Florida Avenue in Lakeland as observed on or about October 18, 2016. Sub contractor employees were working on the 8:12 pitch steep roof installing roof sheathing without the use of a personal fall arrest system. Employees were exposed to an approximate 42 foot fall. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260502 D15 |
Issuance Date |
2017-01-12 |
Current Penalty |
2993.04 |
Initial Penalty |
8730.0 |
Final Order |
2017-01-25 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. For subcontractor's employees working at 6710 South Florida Avenue in Lakeland as observed on or about 18 October, 2016. a) Employees were working on the fourth floor roof while using personal fall arrest equipment without an anchor point. The employees wrapped the lifeline around the stub of a framing member for the truss and connected to itself. The employees were exposed to a fall height of approximately 41 feet 6.75 inches. b) Employees were working on the third floor balcony while using personal fall arrest equipment without an anchor point. The employees wrapped a lanyard around a framing wall stud and connected to itself. The employees were exposed to a fall height of approximately 21 feet 8.5 inches. |
|
|