Entity Name: | UCRC HOLDINGS INC |
Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
Filing Type: |
Domestic Profit
UCRC HOLDINGS INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act. |
Status: |
Inactive
The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders. |
Date Filed: | 30 Jun 2008 (17 years ago) |
Date of dissolution: | 27 Sep 2013 (12 years ago) |
Last Event: | ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT |
Event Date Filed: | 27 Sep 2013 (12 years ago) |
Document Number: | P08000062596 |
FEI/EIN Number |
262892352
Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS. |
Address: | 3838 N UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUNRISE, FL, 33351, US |
Mail Address: | 3838 N UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUNRISE, FL, 33351, US |
ZIP code: | 33351 |
County: | Broward |
Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
Name | Role | Address |
---|---|---|
HOSTE GARY F | President | 3838 N UNIVERSITY DR, SUNRISE, FL, 33351 |
HOSTE GARY F | Director | 3838 N UNIVERSITY DR, SUNRISE, FL, 33351 |
HOSTE GARY F | Agent | 3838 N UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUNRISE, FL, 33351 |
Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
---|---|---|---|
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2013-09-27 | - | - |
REINSTATEMENT | 2011-10-07 | - | - |
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2011-09-23 | - | - |
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2009-06-30 | 3838 N UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUNRISE, FL 33351 | - |
AMENDMENT | 2008-10-03 | - | - |
Document Number | Status | Case Number | Name of Court | Date of Entry | Expiration Date | Amount Due | Plaintiff |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J15000392312 | LAPSED | 502013CA013156XXXXMB | 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, PALM BE | 2015-02-19 | 2020-03-27 | $21,360.62 | THE DENTAL LAW FIRM, P.A., 3900 WOODLAKE BLVD., SUITE 202, GREENACRES, FL 33467 |
Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVYA KHULLAR, ESQ. and KHULLAR, P.A. VS JEFFREY A. MILLER, et al. | 4D2021-1284 | 2021-04-09 | Closed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name | KHULLAR P.A. |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | Divya Khullar |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | UCRC HOLDINGS INC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Anabel I. Nemrow, Mark W. Rickard |
Name | Gary Hoste |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. William W. Haury, Jr. |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Broward |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2022-06-16 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellants' June 9, 2022 motion for extension of time to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court is denied. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.120(b) (the jurisdiction of the supreme court can only be invoked by the timely filing of a notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 9.120(b)). |
Docket Date | 2022-06-09 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE A NOTICE TO INVOKE THE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2022-05-27 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate |
Docket Date | 2022-05-10 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | West Publishing |
Description | West Publishing |
Docket Date | 2022-05-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc |
Description | Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 10, 2022 motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, written opinion, and certification is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellee Mark W. Rickard, P.A. d/b/a Law Guard’s February 24, 2022 motion for rehearing on motion for attorney’s fees is denied. |
Docket Date | 2022-04-12 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2022-03-28 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellants' March 24, 2022 renewed motion for a twelve (12) day extension of time to respond to appellee's motion for rehearing is granted. However, the appellants' request for permission to reply to the appellee's response, and the appellants’ request to file an amended motion for rehearing after it has already been responded to by the appellee, are both denied. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 (authorizing only one motion for rehearing and one response). |
Docket Date | 2022-03-24 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ *RENEWED* |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2022-03-11 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ **SEE RENEWED MOTION** |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2022-03-10 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ FOR WRITTEN OPINION AND MOTION TO CERTIFY |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2022-03-10 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2022-02-24 |
Type | Disposition by Opinion |
Subtype | Affirmed |
Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
Docket Date | 2022-02-24 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2022-02-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Deny Attorney's Fees ~ ORDERED that appellee Mark W. Rickard, P.A. d/b/a Law Guard’s December 7, 2021 motion for attorney's fees is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellants’ December 28, 2021 “motion for sanctions pursuant to Fla. R. App. 9.410(b)” is denied. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-02 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion For Leave To File Amended Brief |
Description | Grant Motion Serve Amended Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants’ January 10, 2022 motion to serve an amended reply brief is granted. Said reply brief is deemed filed as of the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-10 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Cross-Reply Brief |
Description | Appellee/Cross-Appellant's Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2022-01-10 |
Type | Motions Relating to Briefs |
Subtype | Motion to Amend Brief |
Description | Motion For Leave To File Amended Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2022-01-07 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Cross-Answer Brief |
Description | Cross-Appellee's Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2022-01-04 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellee's December 29, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ December 28, 2021 motion for extension of time to file cross answer brief is granted, and appellants shall serve the cross answer brief on or before January 7, 2022. In addition, if the cross-answer brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-29 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-12-28 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Reply Brief |
Description | Appellant's Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-12-28 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ CROSS-ANSWER BRIEF |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-12-28 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion for Sanctions |
Description | Motion for sanctions |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-12-13 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellee's December 8, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ December 8, 2021 motion for extension of time to file reply brief and cross answer brief is granted in part, and appellants shall serve the reply brief and cross answer brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief and cross answer brief are served after the time provided for in this order, they may be stricken. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-08 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-12-08 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-12-07 |
Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-11-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing |
Description | ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ~ ORDERED that appellants’ October 19, 2021 motion to supplement the record is granted, and the record is supplemented to include the February 11, 2021 hearing transcript. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-11-10 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Supplemental Record |
Description | Supplemental Records ~ ***MOTION GRANTED*** |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-11-09 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-11-09 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix |
Description | Appendix to Brief |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-11-09 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Answer Brief |
Description | Appellee's Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-11-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Response |
Description | ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellees are directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellants’ October 19, 2021 motion to supplement. |
Docket Date | 2021-10-19 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Motion To File Supplemental Record |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-10-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
Description | Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellants’ October 15, 2021 initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). |
Docket Date | 2021-10-18 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix |
Description | Appendix to Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-10-18 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Amended Initial Brief |
Description | Amended Appellant's Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-10-15 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Initial Brief |
Description | Initial Brief on Merits ~ ***STRICKEN 10/18/21*** |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-10-05 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ Upon consideration of appellees’ September 30, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ September 27, 2021 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is granted in part, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time. Further, ORDERED that appellees’ September 30, 2021 motion for sanctions is denied without prejudice. |
Docket Date | 2021-10-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order |
Description | Order Denying Rehearing Interim Order ~ ORDERED that appellants’ September 10, 2021 “motion for rehearing and clarification of September 8, 2021 order” is denied. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-30 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO APPELLANTS' AMENDED THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND, MOTION FOR SANCTIONS |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-09-27 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-09-27 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Order denying EOT w/out prejudice 9.300(a) ~ ORDERED that appellants’ September 24, 2021 motion for extension of time is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court's Notice to Attorneys and to Parties Representing Themselves, Paragraphs 1 and 2. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-24 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-09-10 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction |
Description | ORD-Deny Relinquishment of Jurisdiction ~ Upon consideration of appellee Mark W. Rickard, P.A. d/b/a Law Guard’s August 31, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ August 30, 2021 motion to relinquish jurisdiction and for stay/review is denied. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-31 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Request for Emergency Treatment |
Description | Request for Emergency Treatment |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-08-31 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR RELINQUISHMENT |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-08-31 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix to Response |
Description | Appendix to Response |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-08-31 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Request for Emergency Treatment |
Description | Denying Request for Emergency Treatment ~ ORDERED that appellant’s August 31, 2021 request for emergency treatment is denied. The court will handle the filing in the normal course of business. No motion for rehearing as to this order will be entertained. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-30 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction |
Description | Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-08-27 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellee Mark W. Rickard, P.A.’s August 23, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ August 20, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-23 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-08-23 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix to Response |
Description | Appendix to Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-08-20 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-06-23 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants' June 17, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
Docket Date | 2021-06-17 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-06-15 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-06-15 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Record on Appeal |
Description | Received Records ~ 441 PAGES |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-06-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on June 6, 2021, appellants are ordered to file a report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment for and preparation of the record on appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-06-01 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Affidavit |
Description | Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
Docket Date | 2021-05-07 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on April 28, 2021, appellants are ordered to file a report, within five (5) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the preparation of the record on appeal. |
Docket Date | 2021-05-07 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-04-28 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Affidavit |
Description | Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
Docket Date | 2021-04-23 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Cross Appeal |
Description | Notice of Cross Appeal ~ ***CERTIFIED COPY*** |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
Docket Date | 2021-04-21 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Cross-Notice Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
Description | CROSS NOTICE FILING FEE PAID THROUGH PORTAL |
Docket Date | 2021-04-21 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Cross Appeal |
Description | Notice of Cross Appeal ~ FEE PAID THROUGH PORTAL |
On Behalf Of | Jeffrey A. Miller |
Docket Date | 2021-04-09 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2021-04-09 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
Description | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-04-09 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Divya Khullar |
Docket Date | 2021-04-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County CACE15-001694 |
Parties
Name | Gary Hoste |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | UCRC HOLDINGS INC |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | UCRC, INC. |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Name | JEFFREY MILLER LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Anabel I. Nemrow, ROBERT S. SHAPIRO, Mark W. Rickard |
Name | Hon. Marina Garcia-Wood |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Broward |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2016-02-02 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Trial Court Document |
Description | Misc. LT pleadings ~ COURTESY COPY OF LETTER RE: PREPARATION FEE FOR INDEX TO ROA |
Docket Date | 2015-12-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Bankruptcy |
Description | ORD-Case Stayed Pending Bankruptcy ~ A suggestion of bankruptcy having been filed, and it appearing that no cause exists as to why the entire above-styled appeal should not be stayed by virtue of 11 U.S.C § 362, it isORDERED that: This appeal is stayed. If the bankruptcy case becomes closed, dismissed, or modified to permit this appeal to proceed, then appellant shall promptly, and in no event later than twenty (20) days after the event has occurred, notify this court in writing that this appeal may proceed. Unless this appeal is voluntarily dismissed, appellant, within ninety (90) days from the date of this order, and then every ninety (90) days thereafter, shall notify this court as to the status of the bankruptcy case. |
Docket Date | 2017-04-27 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Mark William Rickard, counsel for the appellee, is directed to file a report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings. |
Docket Date | 2017-02-09 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Affidavit |
Description | Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE. |
Docket Date | 2017-01-24 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2017-01-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Mark William Rickard, counsel for the appellee, is directed to file a report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings. |
Docket Date | 2016-10-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Mark William Rickard, counsel for the appellee, is directed to file areport within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcyproceedings. |
Docket Date | 2016-10-19 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2016-07-12 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Mark William Rickard, counsel for the appellee, is directed to file a report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcy case. |
Docket Date | 2016-07-12 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report ~ BANKRUPTCY CASE IS CURRENTLY OPEN AND PENDING |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2016-04-06 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
Description | Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Mark William Rickard, counsel for the appellee, is directed to file a report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcy case. |
Docket Date | 2016-04-06 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report ~ BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS REMAIN PENDING |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2017-08-30 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissal ~ Appellants have failed to respond to this court's August 9, 2017 order directing them to file either a voluntary dismissal, or a response explaining why this appeal should not be dismissed. Appellee's July 5, 2017 status report indicated that the issues between the parties were resolved except for a pending motion for sanctions, and this court denied the motion for sanctions (and a pending motion for attorney's fees) on July 13, 2017, so all issues should now be resolved. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed.CONNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. |
Docket Date | 2017-08-30 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Dismissed - Order by Judge |
Docket Date | 2017-08-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Response |
Description | ORD-Appellant to File Response ~ Upon consideration of appellee's July 5, 2017 status report, which indicates that the issues between the parties are resolved except for a pending motion for sanctions, and upon consideration of this court's July 13, 2017 order denying appellee's motion for attorneys' fees and motion for sanctions, it is ORDERED that appellants shall file a notice of voluntary dismissal, or a response showing cause why this appeal should not be dismissed, within five (5) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2017-07-13 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Deny Attorney's Fees ~ ORDERED that appellee's September 1, 2015 motion for attorneys' fees and appellee's September 24, 2015 motion for sanctions are denied without prejudice to appellee seeking sanctions and fees in the trial court. |
Docket Date | 2017-07-05 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Filing |
Description | Notice of Filing ~ SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISCHARGE. |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2017-07-05 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report ~ REGARDING BANKRUPTCY. |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2017-05-04 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report ~ REGARDING BANKRUPTCY. |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2015-11-17 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Show Cause re Bankruptcy |
Description | Order on Suggestion of Bankruptcy ~ Upon consideration of appellee's November 9, 2015 suggestion of bankruptcy and notice to proceed against counsel, it is ORDERED that all parties shall show cause in writing, if any there be, within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled appeal should not be stayed by virtue of 11 U.S.C. § 362. The court notes that if this appeal is stayed, all pending matters - including those against non-debtor appellants and counsel - will be addressed upon the expiration of the stay. |
Docket Date | 2015-11-09 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Suggestion of Bankruptcy |
Description | Suggestion of Bankruptcy ~ AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO PROCEED AGAINST COUNSEL **SEE 12/18/15 ORDER** |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2015-10-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel |
Description | ORD-Withdraw as Counsel ~ ORDERED that Divya Khullar, Esq. and Khullar, P.A.'s October 9 and October 14, 2015 motions to withdraw are granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that (1) this appeal is stayed for twenty (20) days from the date of this order so that new counsel, if desired (as to appellant Gary Hoste), may be obtained;(2) this stay will be automatically lifted if substitute counsel files a notice of appearance prior to the end of the 20 day abatement period; (3) if no counsel has filed a notice of appearance within twenty (20) days, all pleadings shall be sent to appellants at the address appearing below; (4) if substitute counsel does not appear within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, appellant Gary Hoste is advised that the case will move forward as to him after the abatement period and compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and the rules of this court is required. Failure to comply with the rules may result in dismissal or other sanctions. As to appellants UCRC, Inc. and UCRC Holdings, Inc., it is further ORDERED that a corporation may not appear unrepresented by counsel in a Florida court. See Telepower Communication, Inc. v. LTI Vehicle Leasing Corp., 658 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, C.A., 476 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Parrot Cove Marina, LLC v. Duncan Seawall Dock & Boatlift, Inc., 978 So. 2d 811, 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, if no substitute counsel appears within twenty (20) days on behalf of UCRC, Inc. and UCRC Holdings, Inc., the appeal will be dismissed as to those appellants. Further ORDERED that the appellants are directed to file a response to this court's August 21, 2015 order to file a statement of the basis of this court's jurisdiction to review the order appealed by November 16, 2015, either pro se or via counsel as set forth above. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. Further, with respect to Divya Khullar, Esq.'s allegation in paragraph 4 of the October 14, 2015 second amended motion to withdraw that this court did not serve the August 21, 2015 order to file a statement for basis of jurisdiction on him, the court notes that the order was served on Mr. Khullar at the two registered e-mail addresses he registered with this court's electronic filing system - assistant@khullarlaw.com and dkhullar@khullarlaw.com. The court further notes that, according to this court's electronic filing system, Mr. Khullar viewed the order on August 22, 2015 at 5:01 p.m. In addition, the court served its September 28, 2015 order to show cause on Mr. Khullar at the same e-mail addresses, and Mr. Khullar viewed the order on September 28, 2015 at 10:44 a.m. Finally, the court notes that, at the time the court issued the August 21, 2015 and September 28, 2015 orders, Mr. Khullar had not included notices@khullarlaw.com as a registered address in his eDCA account. It is the eDCA registrant's responsibility to ensure that the proper service addresses are registered the registrant's eDCA account. |
Docket Date | 2015-10-14 |
Type | Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel |
Subtype | Motion To Withdraw as Counsel |
Description | Motion To Withdraw as Counsel ~ 2ND AMENDED |
On Behalf Of | Gary Hoste |
Docket Date | 2015-10-09 |
Type | Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel |
Subtype | Motion To Withdraw as Counsel |
Description | Motion To Withdraw as Counsel ~ (AMENDED) |
On Behalf Of | Gary Hoste |
Docket Date | 2015-10-09 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO AMENDED MOTION TO WITHDRAW |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2015-10-08 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel |
Description | Order Denying Withdraw as Counsel ~ ORDERED that Divya Khullar's October 5, 2015 motion to withdraw as counsel is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.440(b), in that counsel failed to provide the client's address or serve the client. |
Docket Date | 2015-10-06 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response ~ TO MOTION TO WITHDRAW COUNSEL |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2015-10-05 |
Type | Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel |
Subtype | Motion To Withdraw as Counsel |
Description | Motion To Withdraw as Counsel |
On Behalf Of | Gary Hoste |
Docket Date | 2015-09-28 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order |
Description | Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ ORDERED that appellee's September 1, 2015 motion to strike is granted, as the August 31, 2015 initial brief does not comply with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Further, the initial brief was filed while this court's August 21, 2015 jurisdictional order was pending, and appellants have not complied with that order. Accordingly, it is further ORDERED that appellants shall show cause in writing, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to respond to the jurisdictional order. If the jurisdictional statement is filed within the time provided herein, this order to show cause shall be considered automatically discharged without further order. Further, appellants shall not file their initial brief until this court has decided whether or not it has jurisdiction. If this court concludes that it has jurisdiction, the briefing schedule shall be set by further order. |
Docket Date | 2015-09-24 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Filing |
Description | Notice of Filing ~ PRIOR MOTION IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2015-09-24 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion for Sanctions |
Description | Motion for sanctions |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2015-09-08 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Amended Notice of Appeal |
Description | Amended Notice of Appeal ~ CERT. COPY FILED 8/26/15 |
Docket Date | 2015-09-01 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion To Strike |
Description | Motion To Strike |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2015-09-01 |
Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
On Behalf Of | JEFFREY MILLER |
Docket Date | 2015-08-31 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Initial Brief |
Description | Initial Brief on Merits ~ **BRIEF STRICKEN - SEE 9/28/15 ORDER** |
On Behalf Of | Gary Hoste |
Docket Date | 2015-08-21 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2015-08-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
Docket Date | 2015-08-20 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Amended Notice of Appeal |
Description | Amended Notice of Appeal ~ CERT. COPY FILED 8/17/15 |
Docket Date | 2015-08-19 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Gary Hoste |
Docket Date | 2015-08-19 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
Name | Date |
---|---|
ANNUAL REPORT | 2012-02-17 |
REINSTATEMENT | 2011-10-07 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2010-02-05 |
Dom/For AR | 2009-06-30 |
Amendment | 2008-10-03 |
Domestic Profit | 2008-06-30 |
Date of last update: 02 Apr 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State