|
DIVYA KHULLAR, Appellant(s) v. CINDY A. GOLDSTEIN, P.A., et al., Appellee(s).
|
4D2024-0565
|
2024-03-04
|
Open
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE22-006638
|
Parties
| Name |
KHULLAR P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Name |
Divya Khullar
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Bart Houston, Barry Gilbert Roderman, Alexander Gabriel Lewitt
|
|
| Name |
KHULLAR LAW PLLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Name |
Sanford Roy Topkin
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
CINDY GOLDSTEIN, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Broward Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Cindy Allison Goldstein, Gregg Alan Silverstein
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-05-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellant is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the progress of the bankruptcy proceedings as to Divya Khullar.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-20
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal (non-dispositive)
|
| Description |
ORDERED that the above-styled appeal is dismissed as to Khullar PA and Khullar Law only.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Filing
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Compliance
|
| Description |
Notice of Compliance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-27
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Compliance
|
| Description |
Notice of Compliance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
A suggestion of bankruptcy having been filed, it is
ORDERED that the parties shall, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, request that the United States Bankruptcy Court issue an order stating whether this appeal should be stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) or any other provision of the United States Bankruptcy Code. See, e.g., In re Hill, 364 B.R. 826, 828 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007) ("Comfort orders serve a valuable purpose. The orders are entered primarily for a third party's benefit, often to help a sister state court attempting to determine whether it can proceed with a pending action, such as a foreclosure."). Upon the filing of the request in the United States Bankruptcy Court, the parties shall file a notice of compliance with this Court. Further, should the United States Bankruptcy Court enter an order on the parties' request, the parties shall file a copy of the order with this Court within five (5) days of issuance of that order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Docketing Statement
|
| Description |
Appellants' Statement of No Standing to File Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellants' September 3, 2024 motion for extension of time to file the initial brief is denied. Appellants shall file the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution without further notice.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-03
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellant's August 19, 2024 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and Appellant shall serve the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-20
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Appellants' Motion for Extension of Time
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-19
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-07-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellants' July 15, 2024 motion for extension of time is granted, and Appellants shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-07-16
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
ORDERED that the stay is lifted. Appellants shall file the initial brief within twenty-two (22) days from the date of this order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-20
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing Bankruptcy Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Suggestion of Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
Suggestion of Bankruptcy
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-10
|
| Type |
Recognizing Agreed Extension
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
30 DAYS TO July 10, 2024.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
| Description |
ORDERED that this court's May 13, 2024 order to show cause is discharged.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Appellants' Amended Response to Order to Show Cause for Failure to Timely Transmit the Record on Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Inability
|
| Description |
Notice of Inability to Transmit the Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-09
|
| Type |
Recognizing Agreed Extension
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
30 DAYS TO June 10, 2024.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Filing
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Suspension of Appellants' Attorney, Divya Khullar by Florida Supreme Court
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-03-18
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| Description |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-03-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-03-05
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-03-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-12
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order Directing a Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellant's December 10, 2024 response to order directing a status report is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). You are notified of the requirement to serve the Appellee with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the Appellee. Appellant may re-file the document with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the Appellee within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-10
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order Directing Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause for Brief or Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellants Khullar P.A. and Khullar Law, LLC. in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before November 3, 2024, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that Appellants' initial brief has not been filed with this court as of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellees' September 27, 2024 notice is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). You are notified of the requirement to serve the Appellants with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the Appellants. Appellees may re-file the document with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the Appellants within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Record on Appeal --2230 Pages
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause for Brief or Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Order to Show Cause for Record on Appeal
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
KHULLAR P.A., DIVYA KHULLAR and KHULLAR LAW PLLC., Appellant(s) v. CINDY A. GOLDSTEIN and CINDY GOLDSTEIN P.A., Appellee(s).
|
4D2023-1620
|
2023-06-30
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE22-006638
|
Parties
| Name |
Divya Khullar
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
KHULLAR P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
KHULLAR LAW PLLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Cindy A. Goldstein
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Gregg Alan Silverstein
|
|
| Name |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Keathan B. Frink
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-01-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-01-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF FILING OF THE NOTICE OF HEARING TO REQUEST THE LOWER TRIBUNAL TO ISSUE A FINAL JUDGMENT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-01-03
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion for Rehearing and Clarification
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE TO JURIDICTIONAL STATEMENT AND MOTION TO STAY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-09
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion to Supplement the Record on Appeal and Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with the November 2, 2023 Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellants' October 24, 2023 response is treated as the jurisdictional statement. Further, ORDERED that Appellees shall, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, file a response to the jurisdictional statement as well as a response to Appellants' October 25, 2023 motion to stay.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing Mandate Issued in 4D21-3253
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-25
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
**Treated as the Jurisdictional Brief Per the 11/02/2023 Order.** Response to September 27, 2023 order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF INABILITY TO TRANSMIT THE RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellants' August 10, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall comply with this Court’s August 2, 2023 order on or before September 15, 2023.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-10
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-28
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal ~ SECOND
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
| Description |
Appellant to File Order Appealed-Civil ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, a conformed copy of the order being appealed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d). This copy must contain a legible stamp from the clerk of the lower tribunal, showing the date and time the order being appealed was filed in that office.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-03
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-30
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-30
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-19
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellants' October 24, 2023 jurisdictional brief and appellees' November 30, 2023 response, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Agere Sys. Inc. v. All American Crating, Inc., 931 So. 2d 244, 245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) ("[A]n order that simply denies a motion for reconsideration or rehearing of an underlying non-final order . . . is not in itself an appealable order."); Williams v. Oken, 62 So. 3d 1129, 1134 (Fla. 2011); Couto v. People's Tr. Ins. Co., 320 So. 3d 224, 225 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (holding an order denying a motion to dismiss is a non-appealable, non-final order because it "is not enumerated in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130"); Dobrick v. Discovery Cruises, Inc., 581 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Rust v. Brown, 13 So. 3d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("An order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party."); and Pineside Condo. Ass'n v. Rey, 342 So. 3d 741 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (""[a]ppeals of nonfinal orders that fall outside the scope of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3) must be dismissed."). Further, ORDERED that Appellants' October 25, 2023 motion to stay is denied as moot.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellees' November 9, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to this court's November 2, 2023 is extended twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Further, ORDERED that Appellees' November 9, 2023 motion to supplement the record on appeal is denied without prejudice to raising the issue after this court makes a determination on jurisdiction.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
It appearing that the orders to which the Notice of Appeal is directed are non-appealable, non-final orders, appellant(s) shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to obtain a final order and to file a copy in this court. Failure to do so will result in sua sponte dismissal of the appeal. Dobrick v. Discovery Cruises, Inc., 581 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Rust v. Brown, 13 So. 3d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)("An order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party.").
ORDERED that the trial court is specifically authorized, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(b), upon appropriate application, to enter a final order in these proceedings.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellants shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellants shall specifically address how the June 8, 2023 order denying motion for rehearing of order denying motion to dismiss, and the May 15, 2023 order denying rehearing are final or nonfinal appealable orders, as they merely deny motions for rehearing directed to non-final orders. See Agere Sys. Inc. v. All American Crating, Inc., 931 So. 2d 244, 245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) ("[A]n order that simply denies a motion for reconsideration or rehearing of an underlying non-final order . . . is not in itself an appealable order."). Further, address how the June 27, 2022 order denying motion to dismiss and the May 19, 2023 order denying motion to dismiss are final or nonfinal appealable orders, as "[i]t is generally inappropriate to review a trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss." Williams v. Oken, 62 So. 3d 1129, 1134 (Fla. 2011); see also Couto v. People's Tr. Ins. Co., 320 So. 3d 224, 225 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (holding an order denying a motion to dismiss is a non-appealable, non-final order because it "is not enumerated in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130"). Further, address how the February 22, 2023 order granting motion to strike and motion for final judgment is a final or nonfinal appealable order, as it merely grants a motion for final judgment. See Dobrick v. Discovery Cruises, Inc., 581 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Rust v. Brown, 13 So. 3d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("An order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party."). Further, address how the September 27, 2022 order denying motion to recuse/disqualify, the December 16, 2022 order setting hearing, the November 8, 2022 order resetting hearing, the March 15, 2023 order denying disqualification, the April 25, 2023 order denying motion to demand statement of evidence, the May 14, 2023 order granting motion to strike, the June 8, 2023 order denying omnibus motion to vacate, and the July 20, 2023 order denying motion to vacate are final or nonfinal appealable orders, as "[a]ppeals of nonfinal orders that fall outside the scope of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3) must be dismissed." Pineside Condo. Ass'n v. Rey, 342 So. 3d 741 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022). Further,Appellees may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
|
|
DIVYA KHULLAR, KHULLAR LAW PLLC. and KHULLAR P.A., et al. VS SUPER NICE STS. INC., et al.
|
4D2022-2864
|
2022-10-21
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE19-011080
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE22-006638
|
Parties
| Name |
KHULLAR P.A.
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Inadil Forestal
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Name |
KHULLAR LAW PLLC
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SUPER NICE STS, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Cindy A. Goldstein
|
|
| Name |
TRANSPORTATION AMERICA, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Keathan B. Frink
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2022-10-21
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus ~ *AND WRIT OF PROHIBITION* *FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Inadil Forestal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-15
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Inadil Forestal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Supplement ~ TO PETITION.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Inadil Forestal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF ANDREFERENCED IN PETITIONERS' EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Inadil Forestal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-06
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Order Denying Petition for Writ - Mandamus ~ ORDERED that the October 21, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus is treated as a petition for writ of mandamus and writ of prohibition and the petition is denied. Further,ORDERED that respondent’s December 23, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record in this petition. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order. Further,ORDERED that the January 13, 2023 joint motion for sanctions is denied.CIKLIN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-06
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Order Denying Stay ~ ORDERED that Petitioner’s December 22, 2022 motion to stay is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-13
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Motion for sanctions
|
| On Behalf Of |
Super Nice Sts. Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ **PROPOSED**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Super Nice Sts. Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Denying Request for Emergency Treatment ~ ORDERED that petitioners’ December 22, 2022 request for emergency treatment is denied. The court will handle the filing in the normal course of business. No motion for rehearing as to this order will be entertained.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Super Nice Sts. Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ EMERGENCY.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Inadil Forestal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ **PROPOSED**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Inadil Forestal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that petitioners’ December 15, 2022 motion is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-25
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus / Acknowledgment letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition ~ *FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY
|
|
|
|
KHULLAR, P.A. VS CINDY A. GOLDSTEIN, P.A.
|
4D2021-3253
|
2021-11-16
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - County Small Claims - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CONO21-002226
|
Parties
| Name |
KHULLAR P.A.
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Name |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Gregg Alan Silverstein, Cindy A. Goldstein
|
|
| Name |
Hon. John D. Fry
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-01-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 30, 2022 motion for extension is granted, and the time for filing a motion for rehearing is extended to January 29, 2023.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-30
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-10
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-03
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 29, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-29
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-29
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-24
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that appellant's February 9, 2023 “motion for rehearing, motion for written opinion, motion for rehearing en banc and to request Broward Clerk of Court to supplement trial court record” is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-09
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ MOTION FOR WRITTEN OPINION AND REQUEST BROWARD CLERK OF COURT TO SUPPLEMENT TRIAL COURT RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 31, 2023 motion for extension of time is denied. Appellant shall file the motion for rehearing within three (3) days or the mandate will issue.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-31
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-31
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's June 3, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before July 5, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's May 4, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-04
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (78 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 5, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted, and the proposed supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 4, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before April 5, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before April 4, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's February 28, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before March 14, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-28
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s January 11, 2022 jurisdictional brief and appellee’s January 21, 2022 response, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to the January 5, 2022 order. Further, ORDERED that this appeal shall proceed as to the December 17, 2021 order.CONNER, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 28, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before February 27, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ (858 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-11
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the January 5, 2022 order is an appealable final or nonfinal order, as the order appears to contemplate further judicial labor by setting a case management conference for January 7, 2022. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110, 9.130. Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH PAYMENT OF THE INVOICE FOR THE RECORD ON APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Discharging Show Cause ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's response filed December 29, 2021, this court's December 22, 2021 order to show cause is discharged.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-29
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ***DISCHARGED 12/30/21***ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before January 3, 2022, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF COMPLIANCE WITH NOVEMBER 19, 2021 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-23
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus ~ *Certified Copy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Document
|
| Description |
Misc. LT pleadings ~ *Civil Cover Sheet
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Reclassifying Case
|
| Description |
ORD-Writ Treated as NOA ~ ORDERED that the petition improperly seeks review of two distinct nonfinal rulings. The first ruling concerning payment of expert witness fees for a deposition is not appealable or subject to extraordinary writ review. Valenzuela v. Valenzuela, 648 So. 2d 741, 741 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). The petition is dismissed as to this ruling. The October 21, 2021 order imposing attorney’s fees as a sanction is a final appealable order. Ruppel v. Gulf Winds Apartments, Inc., 508 So. 2d 534, 535 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (citing Kucera v. Kucera, 330 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). The petition is treated as a notice of appeal from the October 21, 2021 sanction order. The appeal shall proceed under rule 9.110. Petitioner/appellant may file directions to the clerk under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(2) within ten (10) days from the date of this order, and respondent/appellee may file directions for additional documents and exhibits within ten (10) days after the filing of directions to the clerk. The times for preparing the record on appeal, serving the index to the record on appeal, and for service of briefs are extended correspondingly.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that petitioner's appendix to the petition for writ of mandamus is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition ~ AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-16
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-16
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus ~ **Filing Fee Paid Through Portal**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition ~ **Stricken**
|
|
|
|
KHULLAR, P.A. VS CINDY A. GOLDSTEIN, P.A.
|
4D2021-2679
|
2021-09-16
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - County Civil - Certiorari
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CONO21-002226
|
Parties
| Name |
KHULLAR P.A.
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Name |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. John Hurley
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2021-11-15
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Granted
|
| Description |
Granted - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Grant Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that respondent's November 8, 2021 motion to strike is granted. The appendix to the reply and all references to the appendix in the reply are stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-08
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-08
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-05
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Certiorari
|
| Description |
Petition for Certiorari Filed ~ SECOND
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-05
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ ***STRICKEN 11/9/21***TO REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Reply to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that respondent's appendix to the response filed October 26, 2021, is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not completely text searchable, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ ***STRICKEN 10/28/21***TO MOTION TO AMEND
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Granted
|
| Description |
Order-Original Proceeding Granted ~ ORDERED that the document filed November 5, 2021, titled “Petitioner’s Second Petition for Writ of Mandamus or in the Alternative Writ of Certiorari” and the appendix thereto filed November 8, 2021, are stricken as unauthorized. An order to show cause issued on the petition that initiated this proceeding. A response and reply have been filed, and this case is fully briefed. On October 28, 2021, this court denied petitioner's motion to amend/supplement the petition, which improperly sought to raise new issues in this proceeding. Further,ORDERED that, having considered the response to this court’s order to show cause, the petition is granted. The August 18, 2021 and September 15, 2021 orders are quashed solely to the extent that they require petitioner to deposit the disputed funds in the court registry. The law is clear that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.600 is permissive and does not authorize a court to compel a deposit in the court registry. Tixe Designs, Inc. v. Green Ice, Inc., 207 So. 3d 348, 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Fiscal Operations, Inc. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 808 So. 2d 1287, 1288 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Williams v. First Union Nat’l Bank of Fla., 591 So. 2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). In these circumstances, there is no explicit authority in any statute or rule allowing the court to order a deposit. The court did not have inherent authority to do so under the Rules of Professional Responsibility. CONNER, C.J., WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO OBTAIN LEAVE OF COURT TO AMEND/SUPPLEMENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Grant Stay ~ ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the petition is treated as seeking a writ of certiorari. Petitioner’s September 28, 2021 motion for stay is granted in part. Any sanction proceedings concerning the orders at issue are stayed pending the outcome of this proceeding; further, ORDERED that, within twenty (20) days of this order, respondent shall file a response and show cause why the orders at issue should not be quashed to the extent they require deposit of funds in the court registry. Petitioner may file a reply within ten (10) days thereafter.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-17
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus / Acknowledgment letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Denying Request for Emergency Treatment ~ ORDERED that petitioner's September 16, 2021 request for emergency treatment is denied. The court will handle the filing in the normal course of business. No motion for rehearing as to this order will be entertained.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-16
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition ~ *FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-16
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-16
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus ~ *FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Khullar, P.A.
|
|
|
|
DIVYA KHULLAR, ESQ. and KHULLAR, P.A. VS JEFFREY A. MILLER, et al.
|
4D2021-1284
|
2021-04-09
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE15-001694
|
Parties
| Name |
KHULLAR P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Divya Khullar
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
UCRC HOLDINGS INC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Anabel I. Nemrow, Mark W. Rickard
|
|
| Name |
Gary Hoste
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. William W. Haury, Jr.
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2022-06-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellants' June 9, 2022 motion for extension of time to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court is denied. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.120(b) (the jurisdiction of the supreme court can only be invoked by the timely filing of a notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 9.120(b)).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-09
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE A NOTICE TO INVOKE THE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-27
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 10, 2022 motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, written opinion, and certification is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellee Mark W. Rickard, P.A. d/b/a Law Guard’s February 24, 2022 motion for rehearing on motion for attorney’s fees is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-12
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellants' March 24, 2022 renewed motion for a twelve (12) day extension of time to respond to appellee's motion for rehearing is granted. However, the appellants' request for permission to reply to the appellee's response, and the appellants’ request to file an amended motion for rehearing after it has already been responded to by the appellee, are both denied. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 (authorizing only one motion for rehearing and one response).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-24
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ *RENEWED*
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-11
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ **SEE RENEWED MOTION**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-10
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ FOR WRITTEN OPINION AND MOTION TO CERTIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-10
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-24
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-24
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Deny Attorney's Fees ~ ORDERED that appellee Mark W. Rickard, P.A. d/b/a Law Guard’s December 7, 2021 motion for attorney's fees is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellants’ December 28, 2021 “motion for sanctions pursuant to Fla. R. App. 9.410(b)” is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Leave To File Amended Brief
|
| Description |
Grant Motion Serve Amended Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants’ January 10, 2022 motion to serve an amended reply brief is granted. Said reply brief is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-10
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Cross-Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee/Cross-Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-10
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Briefs
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Amend Brief
|
| Description |
Motion For Leave To File Amended Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Cross-Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Cross-Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellee's December 29, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ December 28, 2021 motion for extension of time to file cross answer brief is granted, and appellants shall serve the cross answer brief on or before January 7, 2022. In addition, if the cross-answer brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-29
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ CROSS-ANSWER BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Motion for sanctions
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellee's December 8, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ December 8, 2021 motion for extension of time to file reply brief and cross answer brief is granted in part, and appellants shall serve the reply brief and cross answer brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief and cross answer brief are served after the time provided for in this order, they may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-08
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-08
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-07
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ~ ORDERED that appellants’ October 19, 2021 motion to supplement the record is granted, and the record is supplemented to include the February 11, 2021 hearing transcript. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-10
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ ***MOTION GRANTED***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-09
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-09
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellees are directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellants’ October 19, 2021 motion to supplement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-19
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellants’ October 15, 2021 initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-18
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Amended Appellant's Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-15
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits ~ ***STRICKEN 10/18/21***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ Upon consideration of appellees’ September 30, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ September 27, 2021 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is granted in part, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time. Further, ORDERED that appellees’ September 30, 2021 motion for sanctions is denied without prejudice.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing Interim Order ~ ORDERED that appellants’ September 10, 2021 “motion for rehearing and clarification of September 8, 2021 order” is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANTS' AMENDED THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND, MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-27
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Order denying EOT w/out prejudice 9.300(a) ~ ORDERED that appellants’ September 24, 2021 motion for extension of time is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court's Notice to Attorneys and to Parties Representing Themselves, Paragraphs 1 and 2.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-24
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-10
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
ORD-Deny Relinquishment of Jurisdiction ~ Upon consideration of appellee Mark W. Rickard, P.A. d/b/a Law Guard’s August 31, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ August 30, 2021 motion to relinquish jurisdiction and for stay/review is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-31
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-31
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR RELINQUISHMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-31
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Denying Request for Emergency Treatment ~ ORDERED that appellant’s August 31, 2021 request for emergency treatment is denied. The court will handle the filing in the normal course of business. No motion for rehearing as to this order will be entertained.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-30
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellee Mark W. Rickard, P.A.’s August 23, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ August 20, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-23
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-20
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants' June 17, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-17
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 441 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on June 6, 2021, appellants are ordered to file a report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment for and preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on April 28, 2021, appellants are ordered to file a report, within five (5) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-28
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Cross Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Cross Appeal ~ ***CERTIFIED COPY***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Cross-Notice Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
CROSS NOTICE FILING FEE PAID THROUGH PORTAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Cross Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Cross Appeal ~ FEE PAID THROUGH PORTAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jeffrey A. Miller
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-09
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Divya Khullar
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
|
