Docket Date |
2022-03-15
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-23
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' February 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted. Appellees shall serve the response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement on or before March 16, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-24
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-24
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORD-Grant Voluntary Dismissal (Joint) ~ At the request of the parties, this case is dismissed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-23
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-16
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that the May 11, 2022 "joint motion for extension of time for (1) appellees to respond to appellant's brief statement regarding the court's subject matter jurisdiction and (2) appellants to file an initial brief" is granted, and the time for appellees to respond to appellant's jurisdictional brief is extended to and including June 11, 2022. Further, ORDERED that the time for service of the initial brief is extended to and including July 5, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-11
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR (1) APPELLEES TO RESPOND TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND (2) APPELLANTS TO FILE AN INITIAL BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-18
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' unopposed April 12, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant's jurisdictional statement is extended to and including May 5, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-13
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-13
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 05/19/2022
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-12
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECTMATTER JURISDICTION
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-21
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee's March 15, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant's jurisdictional statement is extended to and including April 5, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-09
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 60 DAYS TO 04/19/2022
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-09
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-03
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECTMATTER JURISDICTION
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-24
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' January 21, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement is extended to and including February 4, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-21
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-19
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 18, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to this court’s January 7, 2022 order is extended to and including January 24, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-18
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-14
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-14
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' January 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement is extended to and including January 24, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to Show Cause
|
Description |
Order to Show Cause ~ ORDERED that the parties are to show cause, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to why case numbers 4D21-3483 and 4D21-3506 should not be consolidated for all purposes.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-30
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-30
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' December 30, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement is extended to and including January 17, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ **STRICKEN**
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-20
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-20
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
Description |
Notice of Similar Case Pending
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-14
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-14
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-14
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
Paerosol Global Partners, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECTMATTER JURISDICTION
|
On Behalf Of |
Steve Gareleck
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-04
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' February 3, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement is extended to and including February 14, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that Daniel F. Bachman's December 27, 2021 notice of appearance is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-15
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the November 15, 2021 order is an appealable final order, as it appears a counterclaim containing interrelated claims is still pending in the trial court and it appears the order only determines entitlement to attorney's fees. See Mendez v. W. Flagler Fam. Ass'n, 303 So. 2d 1, 5 (Fla. 1974); Mantabs, LLC v. Happy Fiddler Ass'n, 279 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (dismissing an appeal as premature because an interrelated counterclaim remained pending in the trial court); Alexopoulos v. Gordon Hargrove & James, P.A., 109 So. 3d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ("[O]rders awarding attorney's fees are only final and therefore appealable once the trial court has set the amount of those fees. An order merely finding entitlement to attorney's fee is a non-final, non-appealable order."). Further,Appellees may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-14
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|