Entity Name: | PAEROSOL GLOBAL PARTNERS LLC |
Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
Filing Type: | Florida Limited Liability Co. |
Status: | Active |
Date Filed: | 24 Apr 2020 (5 years ago) |
Last Event: | LC AMENDMENT |
Event Date Filed: | 08 May 2020 (5 years ago) |
Document Number: | L20000109350 |
FEI/EIN Number | 850888580 |
Address: | 14651 Biscayne Blvd # 367, N MIAMI, FL, 33181, US |
Mail Address: | 14651 Biscayne Blvd. #367, N MIAMI, FL, 33181, US |
ZIP code: | 33181 |
County: | Miami-Dade |
Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
Name | Role | Address |
---|---|---|
SALINAS ROBERT | Agent | 5301 TAYLOR ST, HOLLYWOOD, FL, 33021 |
Name | Role |
---|---|
NANOSHIELD TECHNOLOGIES LLC | Manager |
Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
---|---|---|---|
REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED | 2022-04-29 | SALINAS, ROBERT | No data |
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2022-04-29 | 5301 TAYLOR ST, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021 | No data |
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS | 2021-04-23 | 14651 Biscayne Blvd # 367, N MIAMI, FL 33181 | No data |
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS | 2021-04-23 | 14651 Biscayne Blvd # 367, N MIAMI, FL 33181 | No data |
LC AMENDMENT | 2020-05-08 | No data | No data |
Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAEROSOL GLOBAL PARTNERS, LLC VS STEVE GARELECK, et al. | 4D2021-3506 | 2021-12-14 | Closed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name | PAEROSOL GLOBAL PARTNERS LLC |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Representations | Daniel Bitran, Isaac J. Mitrani |
Name | Paerosol Group, LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Fredrick Scott Alderson |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | John Doe(s) |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | COST MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | David L. Stern |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | LAKE AVENUE VENTURES, LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | NANOPURE LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Donald W. Hafele |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Name | Steve Gareleck |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Joshua R. Williams, Jay L. Farrow, Daniel Bachman, Bradley H. Trushin, Zack Schefer |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2022-03-15 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2022-02-23 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' February 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted. Appellees shall serve the response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement on or before March 16, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-06-24 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Dismissed - Order by Clerk |
Docket Date | 2022-06-24 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | ORD-Grant Voluntary Dismissal (Joint) ~ At the request of the parties, this case is dismissed. |
Docket Date | 2022-06-23 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal |
Description | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-05-16 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that the May 11, 2022 "joint motion for extension of time for (1) appellees to respond to appellant's brief statement regarding the court's subject matter jurisdiction and (2) appellants to file an initial brief" is granted, and the time for appellees to respond to appellant's jurisdictional brief is extended to and including June 11, 2022. Further, ORDERED that the time for service of the initial brief is extended to and including July 5, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
Docket Date | 2022-05-11 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR (1) APPELLEES TO RESPOND TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND (2) APPELLANTS TO FILE AN INITIAL BRIEF |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2022-04-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' unopposed April 12, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant's jurisdictional statement is extended to and including May 5, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-04-13 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-04-13 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 05/19/2022 |
Docket Date | 2022-04-12 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECTMATTER JURISDICTION |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2022-03-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee's March 15, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant's jurisdictional statement is extended to and including April 5, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 60 DAYS TO 04/19/2022 |
Docket Date | 2022-02-09 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-02-03 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECTMATTER JURISDICTION |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2022-01-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' January 21, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement is extended to and including February 4, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-21 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2022-01-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 18, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to this court’s January 7, 2022 order is extended to and including January 24, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-18 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response to Order to Show Cause |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-01-14 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2022-01-14 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' January 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement is extended to and including January 24, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-07 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Show Cause |
Description | Order to Show Cause ~ ORDERED that the parties are to show cause, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to why case numbers 4D21-3483 and 4D21-3506 should not be consolidated for all purposes. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-30 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2021-12-30 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' December 30, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement is extended to and including January 17, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-28 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2021-12-27 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance ~ **STRICKEN** |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2021-12-27 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Jurisdictional Brief |
Description | Jurisdictional Brief |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-12-27 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix |
Description | Appendix to Brief |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-12-20 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
Description | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2021-12-20 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Related Case or Issue |
Description | Notice of Similar Case Pending |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-12-14 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2021-12-14 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | FP:Fee Paid Through Portal |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-12-14 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-02-14 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF STATEMENT REGARDING THE COURT'S SUBJECTMATTER JURISDICTION |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2022-02-04 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' February 3, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s jurisdictional statement is extended to and including February 14, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-28 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
Description | Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that Daniel F. Bachman's December 27, 2021 notice of appearance is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Response re Jurisdiction |
Description | AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the November 15, 2021 order is an appealable final order, as it appears a counterclaim containing interrelated claims is still pending in the trial court and it appears the order only determines entitlement to attorney's fees. See Mendez v. W. Flagler Fam. Ass'n, 303 So. 2d 1, 5 (Fla. 1974); Mantabs, LLC v. Happy Fiddler Ass'n, 279 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (dismissing an appeal as premature because an interrelated counterclaim remained pending in the trial court); Alexopoulos v. Gordon Hargrove & James, P.A., 109 So. 3d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ("[O]rders awarding attorney's fees are only final and therefore appealable once the trial court has set the amount of those fees. An order merely finding entitlement to attorney's fee is a non-final, non-appealable order."). Further,Appellees may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-14 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502020CA009041XXXBM |
Parties
Name | FARROW LAW, P.A. |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Representations | Jay L. Farrow |
Name | David L. Stern |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Steve Gareleck |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Fredrick Scott Alderson |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | PAEROSOL GLOBAL PARTNERS LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Daniel Bachman, Bradley H. Trushin, Zack Schefer |
Name | Hon. Donald W. Hafele |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2022-06-29 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | ORD-Grant Voluntary Dismissal (Joint) ~ At the request of the parties, this case is dismissed. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s March 25, 2022 motion for extension is determined to be moot. |
Docket Date | 2022-06-29 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Dismissed - Order by Clerk |
Docket Date | 2022-06-28 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal |
Description | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ ***STIPULATION*** |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-05-16 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' May 11, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s January 13, 2022 brief statement regarding the court’s subject matter jurisdiction is extended thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Appellees are advised that no further extensions will be granted, as this court previously granted one hundred ten (110) days of extensions to file the response. |
Docket Date | 2022-05-11 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-04-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' April 12, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s January 13, 2022 brief statement regarding the court’s subject matter jurisdiction is extended thirty (30) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2022-04-12 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-03-25 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2022-03-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellees' March 15, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s January 13, 2022 brief statement regarding the court’s subject matter jurisdiction is extended twenty (20) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2022-03-15 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-02-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellees' February 14, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s January 13, 2022 brief statement regarding the court’s subject matter jurisdiction is extended to and including March 16, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-14 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-02-08 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-08 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 45 DAYS TO 3/25/22 |
Docket Date | 2022-02-04 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellant’s February 3, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to appellant’s January 13, 2022 brief statement regarding the court’s subject matter jurisdiction is extended to and including February 14, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-02-03 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2022-01-24 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | Response |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 18, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a response to this court’s January 7, 2022 order is extended to and including January 24, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-18 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-13 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Jurisdictional Brief |
Description | Jurisdictional Brief |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 27, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time in which to file a brief on jurisdiction in compliance with this court’s December 13, 2021 order is extended to and including January 13, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-07 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Show Cause |
Description | Order to Show Cause ~ ORDERED that the parties are to show cause, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to why case numbers 4D21-3483 and 4D21-3506 should not be consolidated for all purposes. |
Docket Date | 2022-01-07 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-28 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 27, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time in which to file a brief on jurisdiction in compliance with this court’s December 13, 2021 order is extended to and including January 7, 2022. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-27 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 45 DAYS TO 2/8/22 |
Docket Date | 2021-12-22 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-20 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
Description | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-14 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Amended Notice of Appeal |
Description | Amended Notice of Appeal |
On Behalf Of | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Docket Date | 2021-12-13 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Response re Jurisdiction |
Description | AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the November 15, 2021 order is an appealable final order, as it appears a counterclaim is still pending in the trial court and it appears the order only determines entitlement to attorney's fees. See Mantabs, LLC v. Happy Fiddler Ass'n, 279 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (dismissing an appeal as premature because a counterclaim remained pending in the trial court); Alexopoulos v. Gordon Hargrove & James, P.A., 109 So. 3d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ("[O]rders awarding attorney's fees are only final and therefore appealable once the trial court has set the amount of those fees. An order merely finding entitlement to attorney's fee is a non-final, non-appealable order."). Further,Appellees may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-10 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
Docket Date | 2021-12-10 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Farrow Law, P.A. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
Docket Date | 2021-12-10 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | FP:Fee Paid Through Portal |
Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502020CA009041 |
Parties
Name | PAEROSOL GLOBAL PARTNERS LLC |
Role | Petitioner |
Status | Active |
Representations | Meera K. Koodie, Jay L. Farrow, Paul Souferis |
Name | Steve Gareleck |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Representations | Daniel Bachman, Zack Schefer |
Name | Hon. Donald W. Hafele |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-10-15 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Prohib. ~ ORDERED that the October 6, 2021 petition for writ of prohibition is denied.WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur. |
Docket Date | 2021-10-15 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Denied - Order by Judge |
Docket Date | 2021-10-07 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter |
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix to Petition |
Description | Appendix to Petition |
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | FP:Fee Paid Through Portal |
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Prohibition |
Description | Petition Prohibition ~ **Filing Fee Paid Through Portal** |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502020CA009041 |
Parties
Name | PAEROSOL GLOBAL PARTNERS LLC |
Role | Petitioner |
Status | Active |
Representations | Meera K. Koodie, Jay L. Farrow, Paul Souferis |
Name | Steve Gareleck |
Role | Respondent |
Status | Active |
Representations | Daniel Bachman, Zack Schefer |
Name | Hon. Donald W. Hafele |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-10-21 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Denied - Order by Judge |
Docket Date | 2021-10-21 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Denied |
Description | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Prohib. ~ ORDERED that the petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. GROSS, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur. |
Docket Date | 2021-10-07 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter |
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix to Petition |
Description | Appendix to Petition |
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition Prohibition |
Description | Petition Prohibition ~ **Filing Fee Paid Through Portal** |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-10-06 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
Description | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal |
Classification | NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502020CA009041 |
Parties
Name | PAEROSOL GLOBAL PARTNERS LLC |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Representations | Jay L. Farrow, Meera K. Koodie |
Name | Steve Gareleck |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | Bradley H. Trushin, Daniel Bachman |
Name | David L. Stern |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Fredrick Scott Alderson |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | Hon. Donald W. Hafele |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-08-17 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
Description | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Dismissed - Order by Clerk |
Docket Date | 2021-09-08 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the September 3, 2021 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-03 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal |
Description | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-09-01 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | Steve Gareleck |
Docket Date | 2021-08-24 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant's August 23, 2021 motion for extension is granted, and the time to comply with this court’s August 12, 2021 order is extended ten (10) days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-23 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-08-12 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to File Response re Jurisdiction |
Description | AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how this is a nonfinal, appealable order pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(B) or 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ix). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-11 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter ~ **AMENDED** |
Docket Date | 2021-08-11 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | Paerosol Global Partners, LLC |
Docket Date | 2021-08-11 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-11 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | FP:Fee Paid Through Portal |
Name | Date |
---|---|
ANNUAL REPORT | 2024-04-30 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2023-04-30 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2022-04-29 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2021-04-23 |
LC Amendment | 2020-05-08 |
Florida Limited Liability | 2020-04-24 |
Date of last update: 01 Feb 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State