|
ORANGE COUNTY, Petitioner(s) v. STEPHANIE KENNEDY, Respondent(s).
|
6D2024-0791
|
2024-04-16
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2022-CA-001529-O
|
Parties
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY COMPANY
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Derek James Angell
|
|
| Name |
STEPHANIE KENNEDY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Paige Smith Staudenmaier, S. Maxwell Karrick
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Heather Pinder Rodriguez
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-10-14
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-07-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Petition
|
| Description |
In consideration of Petitioner's Notice of Mootness filed July 8, 2024, Petitioner's emergency motion to enforce mandamus and preclude trial court from proceeding to jury trial on July 9, 2024, or, alternatively, for clarification of the dispositive order or, alternatively, for a writ of prohibition is denied as moot.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-07-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA'S
NOTICE OF MOOTNESS OF EMERGENCY MOTION
FILED JULY 3, 2024
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-07-03
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA'S **EMERGENCY MOTION**
TO ENFORCE MANDAMUS AND PRECLUDE TRIAL COURT
FROM PROCEEDING TO JURY TRIAL ON JULY 9, 2024, OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE DISPOSITIVE
ORDER OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Review
|
| Description |
In light of this court's order granting the petition for writ of
mandamus, petitioner's motion for review of order denying
stay is denied as moot.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-27
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Granted
|
| Description |
Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is granted. See Quintana v. Barad, 528 So. 2d 1300, 1301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ("Where a trial court's refusal to rule has no lawful basis, mandamus is the appropriate remedy."); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.100.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-25
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Review
|
| Description |
APPELLEE MCHALE'S MOTION TO AMEND CASE CAPTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-13
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-09
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONDENT, STEPHANIE KENNEDY'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER, ORANGE COUNTY'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
STEPHANIE KENNEDY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-23
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| Description |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-23
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Satisfied
|
| Description |
Fee Satisfied
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-18
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-16
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Respond to Petition
|
| Description |
Respondent shall serve a response to the petition for writ of mandamus within twenty days. Petitioner may serve a reply within ten days thereafter.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
VINODH RAGHUBIR VS ALLIANCE ONE INC., ET AL
|
6D2023-2794
|
2023-06-09
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2022CA007974
|
Parties
| Name |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JAMES KRANER
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JULIE OKANE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SHANNON LAURIE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DBPR
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ANNA MOMPREMIER, ESQ.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY COMPANY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
ATTORNEY GENERAL, ROBERTA W. JOHNSON, ESQ., JESSICA SCHWIETERMAN, A.A.G., WILLIAM E. LAWTON, ESQ., Bonnie Jean Parrish, BRANDON ACEVEDO, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Renee A. Roche
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HON. JAMES A. YANCEY
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-10-09
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Mail Returned
|
| Description |
RETURNED MAIL RECEIVED ON 10/7/24 - COPY OF ORDER AE'S ANNA MOMPREMIER DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 - RETURN LABEL STATES "RETURN TO SENDER" NOT DELIVERABLE - UNABLE TO FORWARD. FILED EG
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-19
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-01
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order SC2024-0808 "Pursuant to this Court's order dated October 16, 2024, the "Motion for Rehearing, Clarification, Written Opinion" is hereby stricken as unauthorized."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-29
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court SC2024-1548
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion SC2024-0808 "To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, and 6D2023-2794, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2024-0795 and 6D2024-0924, the petition is denied without prejudice. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.250(a)(2). The petition is otherwise denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All other requests are denied, and no motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be considered by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-25
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
| Description |
FLSC LETTER "Dear Vinodh M. Raghubir: In response to your correspondence received on September 24, 2024, please be advised that you appear to be seeking review of Vinodh Raghubir v. Alliance One Inc., et al., Case Nos. 6D2023-2688 & 6D2023-2794. You have already sought review of that district court decision in Vinodh G. Raghubir, et al. v. Alliance One, et al., Case No. SC2024-1331, which is final in this Court. No further pleadings seeking discretionary review can be filed in reference to the above referenced case numbers "
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-13
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion: "Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the 6th District
Court of Appeal on August 15, 2024, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279
(Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ'g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained."
by the Court.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ NOTICE OF 6TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL'S ACCEPTANCE OF PLAINTIFF'S/ APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FL. R. CIV. P. 9.350
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-09
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-30
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Mail Returned
|
| Description |
Mail Returned - Shannon Laurie's copy of August 15, 2024 order was returned to clerk's office. Postal note on envelope reads: Return to sender - insufficient address - Unable to forward.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
PETITIONER'S MOTION for REHEARING EN BANC, CERTIFICATION, WRITTEN OPINION, AND CLARIFICATION ,SWORN STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE and PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
In recognition of the return of jurisdiction to the lower tribunal based on the finality of the appeal in 6D23-3019 as of August 14, 2024, such that the lower tribunal can resume action on any pending matters that remain before it pursuant to its prior stay order, the consolidated petitions for writ of mandamus in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are denied without prejudice to seek further relief should the lower tribunal fail to lift the stay and proceed on the remaining matters upon motion filed in the lower tribunal.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
FLSC ORDER: "Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because this Court has determined that it would be helpful to the resolution of this case to have the benefit of a response from the lower tribunal regarding the
status of consolidated case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the Sixth District Court of Appeal is requested to file a response. The response shall be served on or before August 22, 2024. The petitioner may file his reply on or before September 3, 2024."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court - PETITION (MANDAMUS) SC2024-0808
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-06
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order (Disposition) "To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Sixth District Court of Appeal to rule in case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the petition is hereby denied without prejudice. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin 2.250(a)(2). To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to rule in case number 6D2023-3019, the appeal is hereby dismissed as unauthorized. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 2014). To the extent that Petitioner seeks relief against the trial court, the petition is hereby dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the district court. Petitioner's motion to stay mandate of lower tribunal is denied. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL PETITION ~ SC ACNOWLEDGMENT LETTER
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Appendix
|
| Description |
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT ~ SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT AND APPENDIX TO PETITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The emergency motions and amended emergency motions filed in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AS TO RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER DATED 07/27/23
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER DATED 07/27/23 AND MOTION TO CLARIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ AMENDEDEMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-26
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY ~ INDIGENCY STATUS NOT SPECIFIED - SIGNED 8/30/22
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-23
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1 ~ entered in error
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed ~ AMENDED PETTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-12
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY ~ TOO OLD, ALSO NOT MARKED INDIGENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
fee - writ; pro se
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-24
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
**SEE AMENDED/CORRECTED ORDER**
The portion of the motions seeking rehearing en banc are stricken as insufficient, see Fla. R. App. P. 9331, and treated as motions for rehearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330. The motions for rehearing, certification, written opinion clarification, and sworn statement of the evidence are denied.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Consolidation
|
| Description |
Consolidation-130 ~ In case number 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794, petitioner seeks to compel the lower tribunal to set a trial for certain defendants and to compel ruling on a motion for discovery. In light of the partial final judgments now pending in subsequently filed appeal 6D23-3019, it is not clear what motions that are the subject of the mandamus petitions in these two cases remain pending. Accordingly, the proceedings in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are consolidated, and petitioner shall show cause within twenty days from the date of this order why the consolidated petition should not be dismissed as moot as to the motions to set trial for particularly named defendants or other pending discovery motions by identifying which motions remain pending in the lower tribunal following the entry of the partial final judgments on appeal in 6D23-3019. The emergency motions to lift stay filed in the subject petitions for writ of mandamus do not contain a copy of any written order imposing a stay for this court’s review and are therefore denied without prejudice to refile a motion with a copy of the lower tribunal’s order entering stay. It is noted that the matters that are the subject of 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794, as original proceedings filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, do not otherwise preclude the lower tribunal from ruling on any motions that remain pending on the docket and providing this court with a copy of those orders.
|
|
|
|
VINODH RAGHUBIR, Petitioner(s) v. JULIE OKANE, ORANGE COUNTY, ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, JESSICA SCHWIETERMAN, A.A.G., ALLIANCE ONE INC., Bonnie Jean Parrish, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE, SHANNON LAURIE, ANNA MOMPREMIER, ESQ., ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ORANGE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - ORANGE COUNTY, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, DBPR, Respondent(s).
|
6D2023-2688
|
2023-05-29
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2022CA007974
|
Parties
| Name |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JAMES KRANER
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JULIE OKANE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY COMPANY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JESSICA SCHWIETERMAN, A.A.G.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
WILLIAM E. LAWTON, ESQ., ATTORNEY GENERAL, BRANDON ACEVEDO, ESQ., ROBERTA W. JOHNSON, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
Bonnie Jean Parrish
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SHANNON LAURIE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ANNA MOMPREMIER, ESQ.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - ORANGE COUNTY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DBPR
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Renee A. Roche
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HON. JAMES A. YANCEY
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-11-19
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-01
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order SC2024-0808 "Pursuant to this Court's order dated October 16, 2024, the "Motion for Rehearing, Clarification, Written Opinion" is hereby stricken as unauthorized."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-29
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court SC2024-1548
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AS TO RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER DATED 07/27/23
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-09
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Mail Returned
|
| Description |
RETURNED MAIL RECEIVED ON 10/7/24 - COPY OF ORDER AE'S ANNA MOMPREMIER DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 - RETURN LABEL STATES "RETURN TO SENDER" NOT DELIVERABLE - UNABLE TO FORWARD. FILED EG
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-25
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
| Description |
FLSC LETTER "Dear Vinodh M. Raghubir: In response to your correspondence received on September 24, 2024, please be advised that you appear to be seeking review of Vinodh Raghubir v. Alliance One Inc., et al., Case Nos. 6D2023-2688 & 6D2023-2794. You have already sought review of that district court decision in Vinodh G. Raghubir, et al. v. Alliance One, et al., Case No. SC2024-1331, which is final in this Court. No further pleadings seeking discretionary review can be filed in reference to the above referenced case numbers "
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-24
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-13
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion: "Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the 6th District
Court of Appeal on August 15, 2024, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279
(Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ'g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained."
by the Court.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
**SEE AMENDED/CORRECTED ORDER**
The portion of the motions seeking rehearing en banc are stricken as insufficient, see Fla. R. App. P. 9331, and treated as motions for rehearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330. The motions for rehearing, certification, written opinion clarification, and sworn statement of the evidence are denied.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-09
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-30
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Mail Returned
|
| Description |
Mail Returned - Shannon Laurie's copy of August 15, 2024 order was returned to clerk's office. Postal note on envelope reads: Return to sender - insufficient address - Unable to forward.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
PETITIONER'S MOTION for REHEARING EN BANC, CERTIFICATION, WRITTEN OPINION, AND CLARIFICATION ,SWORN STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE and PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
FLSC ORDER: "Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because this Court has determined that it would be helpful to the resolution of this case to have the benefit of a response from the lower tribunal regarding the
status of consolidated case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the Sixth District Court of Appeal is requested to file a response. The response shall be served on or before August 22, 2024. The petitioner may file his reply on or before September 3, 2024."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court - PETITION (MANDAMUS) SC2024-0808
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-06
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order (Disposition) "To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Sixth District Court of Appeal to rule in case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the petition is hereby denied without prejudice. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin 2.250(a)(2). To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to rule in case number 6D2023-3019, the appeal is hereby dismissed as unauthorized. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 2014). To the extent that Petitioner seeks relief against the trial court, the petition is hereby dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the district court. Petitioner's motion to stay mandate of lower tribunal is denied. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL PETITION ~ SC ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Appendix
|
| Description |
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT ~ SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT AND APPENDIX TO PETITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ NOTICE OF 6TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL'S ACCEPTANCE OF PLAINTIFF'S/ APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FL. R. CIV. P. 9.350
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The emergency motions and amended emergency motions filed in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ AMENDEDEMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-31
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
fee - writ; pro se
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-30
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-29
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-29
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion SC2024-0808 "To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, and 6D2023-2794, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2024-0795 and 6D2024-0924, the petition is denied without prejudice. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.250(a)(2). The petition is otherwise denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All other requests are denied, and no motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be considered by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
In recognition of the return of jurisdiction to the lower tribunal based on the finality of the appeal in 6D23-3019 as of August 14, 2024, such that the lower tribunal can resume action on any pending matters that remain before it pursuant to its prior stay order, the consolidated petitions for writ of mandamus in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are denied without prejudice to seek further relief should the lower tribunal fail to lift the stay and proceed on the remaining matters upon motion filed in the lower tribunal.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER DATED 07/27/23 AND MOTION TO CLARIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Consolidation
|
| Description |
Consolidation-130 ~ In case number 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794, petitioner seeks to compel the lower tribunal to set a trial for certain defendants and to compel ruling on a motion for discovery. In light of the partial final judgments now pending in subsequently filed appeal 6D23-3019, it is not clear what motions that are the subject of the mandamus petitions in these two cases remain pending. Accordingly, the proceedings in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are consolidated, and petitioner shall show cause within twenty days from the date of this order why the consolidated petition should not be dismissed as moot as to the motions to set trial for particularly named defendants or other pending discovery motions by identifying which motions remain pending in the lower tribunal following the entry of the partial final judgments on appeal in 6D23-3019. The emergency motions to lift stay filed in the subject petitions for writ of mandamus do not contain a copy of any written order imposing a stay for this court’s review and are therefore denied without prejudice to refile a motion with a copy of the lower tribunal’s order entering stay. It is noted that the matters that are the subject of 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794, as original proceedings filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, do not otherwise preclude the lower tribunal from ruling on any motions that remain pending on the docket and providing this court with a copy of those orders.
|
|
|
|
BRIAN K. JONES, Appellant(s) v. ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND JERRY DEMMINGS, SHERIFFF Appellee(s).
|
6D2023-1421
|
2022-08-12
|
Open
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2019-CA-004062-O
|
Parties
| Name |
BRIAN K. JONES
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JERRY DEMINGS, SHERIFFF
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY COMPANY
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Shonda Danielle White
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Vincent Falcone, I I I
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-02-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
| Description |
brief or proceed ~ Appellee shall serve the answer brief within twenty days or this appealwill proceed without it.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-01-08
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Appellant Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
BRIAN K. JONES
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Appellee, Orange County, shall file a supplement to the motion to dismiss within ten days from the date of this order to address whether it was dismissed or otherwise removed as an improper party in the lower tribunal prior to entry of the order on appeal or otherwise should remain listed as an identified as a listed appellee pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020 subject to the option of filing of notice of nonparticipation by appellee for the reasons stated in the motion to dismiss.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-24
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
05/24 Order returned for AA; forwarded to RMC. Checked FDOC, updated address - remailed order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-20
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
MOTION TO DISMISS ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA AS AN APPELLEE
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF NON-PARTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
| Description |
The answer brief in this case is overdue. Appellee shall serve the answer brief within ten days of this order, or this appeal will proceed without it.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(g), the motion to dismiss Orange County, Florida, as an appellee is provisionally denied without prejudice to Orange County's filing of a notice of intent not to file an answer brief or alternatively serving an answer brief raising party status as an issue within that brief within twenty days from the date of this order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-23
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss - supplement
|
| On Behalf Of |
ORANGE COUNTY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee shall serve the answer brief within twenty days, or this appeal will proceed without it.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-03-25
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant Initial Brief w/Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
BRIAN K. JONES
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant’s motion for extension of time to serve initial brief is granted. The initial brief shall be served within thirty days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-27
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
BRIAN K. JONES
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-13
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
BRIAN K. JONES
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
SHOW CAUSE-LACK OF PROSECUTION, INITIAL BRIEF ~ The appellant shall serve the initial brief within 20 days of the date of this order, failing which this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-03
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-30
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Transferred
|
| Description |
ORD-TRANSFER TO ANOTHER COURT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ IB BY 1/20/23; OTSC DISCHARGED
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ CERT OF SVC 11/03/22
|
| On Behalf Of |
BRIAN K. JONES
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
SHOW CAUSE-LACK OF PROSECUTION, INITIAL BRIEF ~ AA W/IN 10 DYS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 258 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-29
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal ~ PER 08/12 ORDER; MAILBOX 08/24/22
|
| On Behalf Of |
BRIAN K. JONES
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-12
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-12
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WW4:Waived-57.081(1)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
| Description |
ORD-AA to File Amended NOA ~ AA W/IN 15 DYS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ MAILBOX 8/4/22
|
| On Behalf Of |
BRIAN K. JONES
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
|
| Description |
LT Certificate of Indigency
|
|
|
|
DAVID W. FOLEY JR., ET AL. VS ORANGE COUNTY, ET AL.
|
SC2021-0080
|
2021-01-13
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Writ - Quo Warranto
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
5D19-2635
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
482016CA007634A001OX
|
Parties
| Name |
Jennifer T. Foley
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
David W. Foley Jr.
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
A Political Subdivision of the State of Florida
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Roderick Love
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY COMPANY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
LINDA BREHMER LANOSA
|
|
| Name |
Joe Roberts
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Mr. Scott Alan Richman
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Tara Gould
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Tim Boldig
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Rocco Relvini
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Mitch Gordon
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
GAIL C. BRADFORD
|
|
| Name |
Frank Detoma
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Asima Azam
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Eric J. Netcher, JESSICA C CONNER
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Tiffany Moore Russell
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Sandra B. Williams
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2021-01-21
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| Description |
Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-21
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Orig Proc Dism No Juris Omnibus
|
| Description |
DISP-ORIG PROC DISM NO JURIS OMNIBUS ~ This case is hereby dismissed. This Court's jurisdiction to issue extraordinary writs may not be used to seek review of an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Foley v. State, 969 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 2007); Persaud v. State, 838 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Grate v. State, 750 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1999). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by the Court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-13
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Filed
|
| Description |
PETITION-QUO WARRANTO
|
| On Behalf Of |
David W. Foley Jr.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
LEWIS BARTON VS ORANGE COUNTY
|
5D2017-3151
|
2017-10-05
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Certiorari
|
| Court |
5th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2017-CV-40-A-O
|
Parties
| Name |
Lewis Barton
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY COMPANY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
WANZO GALLOWAY, JR.
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Gail A. Adams
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Robert J. Egan
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Patricia A. Doherty
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Cty Circuit Ct Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2018-12-10
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
| Description |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-12-10
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Returned Records
|
| Description |
Returned Records ~ NO RECORD
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-12-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ MOT TO DISMISS APPEAL; MOOT PER 12/6 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lewis Barton
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-12-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Moot
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-20
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-20
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Order Dismissing Original Petition
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Show Cause
|
| Description |
Order - Show Cause for failure to file amended Petition ~ PT W/IN 10 DAYS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-10-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
| Description |
ORD-PT to File Amended Petition ~ AND APX W/IN 10 DAYS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-10-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ PT FILE STATUS REPORT BY 10/22
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-20
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lewis Barton
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ PT FILE NEXT STATUS REPORT BY 10/10
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ PT W/I 10 DAYS FILE STATUS REPORT RE: BANKRUPTCY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-13
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ & STATUS REPORT PER 10/13 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lewis Barton
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF INDIGENCY; PS LEWIS BARTON
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lewis Barton
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order re Stay
|
| Description |
ORD-Case Stayed Pending Bankruptcy ~ 6 MONTHS...
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Suggestion of Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
Suggestion of Bankruptcy ~ "NOTICE OF U.S. BANKRUPTCY FILING"
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lewis Barton
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
| Description |
ORD-NOA Treated as Writ ~ AMENDED PETITION CERT & APX BY 10/16
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-05
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WW4:Waived-57.081(1)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-05
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgement Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-05
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed ~ NOA TREATED AS PET FOR CERTIORARI; FILED BELOW 10/3/17
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lewis Barton
|
|
|
