|
VINODH M. RAGHUBIR, Petitioner v. ELAINE BARBOUR, RENEE ROCHE, ANNA MOMPREMIER, BONNIE JEAN PARRISH, STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, DBPR, JAMES YANCEY, AND ALLIANCE ONE, INC., Respondents.
|
6D2024-2587
|
2024-12-10
|
Open
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2022-CA-007974
|
Parties
| Name |
VINODH M. RAGHUBIR
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ELAINE BARBOUR
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
RENEE ROCHE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
ANNA MOMPREMIER
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
BONNIE JEAN PARRISH
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
Civ Lit TLH Attorney General
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
Orange County, Florida
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
Hon. James Alan Yancey
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
DBPR
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton, Roberta Walton Johnson, Civ Lit TLH Attorney General, Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-12-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Appear In Forma Pauperis
|
| Description |
Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the Clerk of the District Court of Appeal, Sixth District, issues this certificate of indigency in compliance with section 57.081 or 57.085, Florida Statutes. The filing fee for this case is waived.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-12
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Satisfied
|
| Description |
Fee Satisfied
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-10
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis
|
| Description |
Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH M. RAGHUBIR
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
This petition has been filed without the filing fee required under section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes. Within twenty days of this order, Petitioner shall forward the required $300.00 filing fee or, if applicable, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with an affidavit of indigency. A form motion for this purpose may be found on this Court's website at https://6dca.flcourts.gov/Clerk-s-Office/Forms, and a copy of this form motion is enclosed with this order if served by mail. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this case.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-10
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Electronic Filing (e-mail)
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH M. RAGHUBIR
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-10
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH M. RAGHUBIR
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
Vinodh M. Raghubir, Petitioner(s) v. Alliance One, et al., Respondent(s)
|
SC2024-1548
|
2024-10-28
|
Open
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Writ - Mandamus
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
6D2023-3019; 6D2023-2688; 6D2023-2794;
Supreme Court of Florida
SC2024-0808
|
Parties
| Name |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Brandon Tyler Acevedo
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Jessica Christy Conner
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Danny Ray Mosley
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
6DCA Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-10-29
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
| Description |
No Fee - Insolvent Below
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-28
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Filed
|
| Description |
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-29
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
Vinodh M. Raghubir et al, Petitioner(s) v. Alliance One et al, Respondent(s)
|
SC2024-1331
|
2024-09-12
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Discretionary Review - Notice to Invoke - Direct Conflict of Decisions
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
6D2023-2688; 6D2023-2794;
|
Parties
| Name |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
William E Lawton, Brandon Acevedo, Roberta Walton Johnson
|
|
| Name |
Florida Department of Corrections
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Shannon Rose Laurie
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Anna Renee' Mompremier
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DHSMV Agency Clerk
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY, 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DBPR Agency Clerk
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Julie Hions O'Kane
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Jessica Lee Schwieterman
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Renee A. Roche
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. James Alan Yancey
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
6DCA Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Bonnie Jean Parrish
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-09-13
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
| Description |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Juris Initial
|
| Description |
Juris Initial
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-13
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Rev/Appeal Dism No Juris Omnibus
|
| Description |
Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the 6th District Court of Appeal on August 15, 2024, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ'g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980).
No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by the Court.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
Vinodh M. Raghubir, Petitioner(s) v. Elaine A. Barbour et al, Respondent(s)
|
SC2024-1325
|
2024-09-12
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Discretionary Review - Notice to Invoke - Direct Conflict of Decisions
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
6D2023-3019;
|
Parties
| Name |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HON. RENEE A. ROCHE, JUDGE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Anna Renee' Mompremier
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Bonnie Jean Parrish
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Civ Lit TLH Attorney General
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DOC Agency Clerk
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. James Alan Yancey
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
6DCA Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Jessica Christy Conner, Jessica Lee Schwieterman, Roberta Walton Johnson, Brandon Acevedo, William E Lawton
|
|
| Name |
DHSMV Agency Clerk
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
| Description |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Juris Initial
|
| Description |
Juris Initial
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Rev/Appeal Dism No Juris Omnibus
|
| Description |
Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the 6th District Court of Appeal on August 14, 2024, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ'g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980).
No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by the Court.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
Vinodh M. Raghubir, Petitioner(s) v. Alliance One, Inc., et al. Respondent(s)
|
SC2024-0808
|
2024-05-29
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Writ - Mandamus
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
6D2023-3019; 6D2023-2688; 6D2023-2794;
|
Parties
| Name |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Brandon Tyler Acevedo
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Jessica Christy Conner
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Danny Ray Mosley
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
6DCA Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-08-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response (Amended)
|
| Description |
Amended Petitioner's Reply to Respondent Sixth D.C.A.'s Response to Construed "Order to Show Cause why Relief Should not be Granted" Dated 08/07/24 as to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-01
|
| Type |
Disposition (SC)
|
| Subtype |
Rehearing/Reinst Stricken (Unauthorized)
|
| Description |
Pursuant to this Court's order dated October 16, 2024, the "Motion for Rehearing, Clarification, Written Opinion" is hereby stricken as unauthorized.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-28
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Letter
|
| Description |
Letter
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-28
|
| Type |
Motion (SC)
|
| Subtype |
Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion for Rehearing, Clarification, Written Opinion * Stricken on 11/1/24 as unauthorized *
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-13
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Amendment/Supplement
|
| Description |
Filed as "Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition"
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Petitioner's Reply to Respondent Sixth D.C.A.'s Response to Construed "Order to Show Cause Why Relief Should Not be Granted" Dated 8/08/24 as to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
6DCA Clerk
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Response/Reply Requested
|
| Description |
Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because this Court has determined that it would be helpful to the resolution of this case to have the benefit of a response from the lower tribunal regarding the status of consolidated case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the Sixth District Court of Appeal is requested to file a response. The response shall be served on or before August 22, 2024. The petitioner may file his reply on or before September 3, 2024.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-29
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
| Description |
No Fee - Insolvent Below
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Mandamus Deny
|
| Description |
To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, and 6D2023-2794, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2024-0795 and 6D2024-0924, the petition is denied without prejudice. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.250(a)(2). The petition is otherwise denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All other requests are denied, and no motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be considered by this Court.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-14
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-12
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Other Substantive
|
| Description |
Amended Motion for Rehearing as to and, to the Clarify the 8/7/24 Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-08
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Other Substantive
|
| Description |
Motion to Clarify the 8/7/24 Order on Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-06-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Brandon Tyler Acevedo
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-29
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Filed
|
| Description |
"Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition"
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
VINODH RAGHUBIR, Petitioner(s) v. ALLIANCE ONE INC., Respondent(s).
|
6D2024-0924
|
2024-05-08
|
Open
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - County Civil - Prohibition
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2023-CA-1395
|
Parties
| Name |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. James Alan Yancey
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Renee A. Roche
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Danny Ray Mosley
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Tyler Acevedo, Jessica Schwieterman, Anna Renee' Mompremier, Bonnie Jean Parrish, William E Lawton, Charles James McHale, Jr., Nicholas Ari Shannin, David Asti, Jessica Christy Conner
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion SC2024-0808 "To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, and 6D2023-2794, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2024-0795 and 6D2024-0924, the petition is denied without prejudice. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.250(a)(2). The petition is otherwise denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All other requests are denied, and no motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be considered by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-03
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Satisfied
|
| Description |
Fee Satisfied
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-29
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
ALLIANCE ONE INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-09
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis
|
| Description |
Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
SUPREME COURT ACKNOWLEDGMENT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-08
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-08
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Transferred from Supreme Court
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
This petition has been filed without a filing fee required by section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes.
Within forty days, Petitioner shall forward the required $300.00 filing fee or, if applicable, an affidavit of insolvency in conformity with the requirements of chapter 57, Florida Statutes, to this court.
If this court does not receive either of the above within the prescribed time, this petition may be subject to dismissal without further notice."
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-08
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-08
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Prohibition
|
| Description |
Petition Prohibition and Mandamus Transferred from Supreme Court
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
|
|
|
Vinodh M. Raghubir, Petitioner(s) v. Alliance One Inc., et al., Respondent(s)
|
SC2024-0609
|
2024-04-25
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Writ - Prohibition
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
482023CA001395A001OX
|
Parties
| Name |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Danny Ray Mosley
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
6DCA Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-05-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-25
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
| Description |
No Fee - Insolvent Below
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-25
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-25
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Stay (Proceedings Below)
|
| Description |
Motion to Stay Lower Court Proceedings Pending Review
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-02
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Transferred
|
| Description |
The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby transferred, pursuant to Harvard v. Singletary, 733 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 1999), to the Sixth District Court of Appeal. The transfer of this case should not be construed as an adjudication or comment on the merits of the petition, nor as a determination that the transferee court has jurisdiction or that the petition has been properly denominated as a petition for writ of prohibition. The transferee court should not interpret the transfer of this case as an indication that it must or should reach the merits of the petition. The transferee court shall treat the petition as if it had been originally filed there on the date it was filed in this Court. Any determination concerning whether a filing fee shall be applicable to this case shall be made by the transferee court. Any and all pending motions in this case are hereby deferred to the transferee court.
Any future pleadings filed regarding this case should be filed in the above mentioned district court at 811 East Main Street, Lakeland, Florida 33801.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-25
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Filed
|
| Description |
Filed as Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
VINODH RAGHUBIR, Petitioner(s) v. ALLIANCE ONE INC., Respondent(s).
|
6D2024-0795
|
2024-04-16
|
Open
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2023CA1395
|
Parties
| Name |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Tyler Acevedo, William E Lawton
|
|
| Name |
Hon. James Alan Yancey
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Danny Ray Mosley
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-11-08
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Satisfied
|
| Description |
Fee Satisfied
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion SC2024-0808 "To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, and 6D2023-2794, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2024-0795 and 6D2024-0924, the petition is denied without prejudice. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.250(a)(2). The petition is otherwise denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All other requests are denied, and no motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be considered by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Reply
|
| Description |
APPENDIX TO PETITIONER'S REPLY TO RESPONDENTS ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BRANDON ACEVEDO AND ,WILLIAM LAWTON'S RESPONSE TO CONSTRUED "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY RELIEF SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED " DATED 08/12/24 and THE FAILURE OF ANY OTHER RESPONDENT TO RESPOND ,as to petitioner's PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
PETITIONER'S REPLY TO RESPONDENTS ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BRANDON ACEVEDO AND ,WILLIAM LAWTON'S RESPONSE TO CONSTRUED "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY RELIEF SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED " DATED 08/12/24 and THE FAILURE OF ANY OTHER RESPONDENT TO RESPOND ,as to petitioner's PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-29
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
RESPONDENTS ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BRANDON ACEVEDO AND WILLIAM LAWTON'S APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
ALLIANCE ONE INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-29
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONDENTS ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BRANDON ACEVEDO AND WILLIAM LAWTON'S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
ALLIANCE ONE INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-12
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
MOTION FOR REHEARING AS TO AND, TO CLARIFY THE 08/12/24 ORDER ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS and PROHIBITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Petition
|
| Description |
Respondent shall serve a response to the petition for writ of mandamus within twenty days and shall address petitioner's claim that the lower tribunal in 2023-CA-1395 has refused to set the case for trial. Petitioner may serve a reply within ten days thereafter.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-07-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Appear In Forma Pauperis
|
| Description |
Upon consideration of Petitioner's affidavit of indigency, Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby granted and the filing fee in this case is hereby waived.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Supplement
|
| Description |
SUPPLEMENT TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS and REQUEST FOR RELIEF BY WRIT OF PROHIBITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Supplement
|
| Description |
SUPPLEMENT TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS and REQUEST FOR RELIEF BY WRIT OF PROHIBITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis
|
| Description |
Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-16
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-04-16
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
Vinodh M. Raghubir, Petitioner(s) v. Alliance One, et al., Respondent(s)
|
SC2024-0233
|
2024-02-15
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Writ - Mandamus
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, 6D2023-2794;
|
Parties
| Name |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Civ Lit TLH Attorney General
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Jessica Schwieterman
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Brandon Tyler Acevedo
|
|
| Name |
6DCA Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-05-14
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Amendment/Supplement
|
| Description |
Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition * Placed with File *
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-03-04
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Stay (Proceedings Below)
|
| Description |
Motion to Stay Mandate of Lower Tribunal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
| Description |
No Fee - Insolvent Below
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Filed
|
| Description |
Petition for Writ of Mandamus
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinodh M. Raghubir
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-06
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Mandamus Deny
|
| Description |
To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Sixth District Court of Appeal to rule in case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the petition is hereby denied without prejudice. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin 2.250(a)(2). To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to rule in case number 6D2023-3019, the appeal is hereby dismissed as unauthorized. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 2014). To the extent that Petitioner seeks relief against the trial court, the petition is hereby dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the district court. Petitioner's motion to stay mandate of lower tribunal is denied. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
VINODH RAGHUBIR VS ELAINE A. BARBOUR, RENEE ROCHE, ANNA MOMPREMIER, BONNIE JEAN PARRISH, STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, ET AL
|
6D2023-3019
|
2023-07-10
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2022-CA-007974
|
Parties
| Name |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Bonnie Jean Parrish
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ANNA MOMPREMIER, ESQ.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange County, Florida
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Renee A. Roche
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - ORANGE COUNTY
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HON. JAMES A. YANCEY
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Orange Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
CIVIL DIVISION, TAMPA ATTORNEY GENERAL
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Elaine A. Barbour
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
JESSICA C. CONNER, ESQ., ATTORNEY GENERAL, JESSICA SCHWIETERMAN, A.A.G., ROBERTA W. JOHNSON, ESQ., BRANDON ACEVEDO, ESQ., WILLIAM E. LAWTON, ESQ.
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-10-29
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court SC2024-1548
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-09
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
The motion to recall mandate and to recuse the panel is denied. The remaining portions of the motion, seeking rehearing en banc, certification, clarification, written opinion, and a statement of the evidence and proceeding are stricken as unauthorized.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
APPELLANT'S MOTION to RECALL MANDATE, REHEARING EN BANC, CERTIFICATION, WRITTEN OPINION, AND CLARIFICATION , for RECUSAL, and SWORN STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE and PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-14
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-14
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Upon consideration that this case was dismissed by the order of this Court, issued September 19, 2023, and upon further consideration that Petitioner's motion for rehearing, filed September 25, 2023, was denied by the order of this Court, issued February 2, 2024, this Court will take no action on Petitioner's subsequent motions "for rehearing en banc, certification, written opinion, and clarification, for recusal, and sworn statement of evidence and proceedings" filed on March 4 and 5, 2024.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
FLSC ORDER: "Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because this Court has determined that it would be helpful to the resolution of this case to have the benefit of a response from the lower tribunal regarding the
status of consolidated case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the Sixth District Court of Appeal is requested to file a response. The response shall be served on or before August 22, 2024. The petitioner may file his reply on or before September 3, 2024."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court PETITION (MANDAMUS) SC2024-0808
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-03-05
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing EN BANC ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC , CERTIFICATION, WRITTEN OPINION, AND CLARIFICATION , for RECUSAL, and SWORN STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE and PROCEEDINGS *duplicate?
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-03-04
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing EN BANC ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC , CERTIFICATION, WRITTEN OPINION, AND CLARIFICATION , for RECUSAL, and SWORN STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE and PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Order Denying Stay ~ The motion to stay mandate is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STAY MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL PETITION ~ SC ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ The motion to clarify and for rehearing, certification, and written opinion is denied. The motions to strike the appellees’ joint response and motions for sanctions are denied. The motion to “order up the complete record” is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-20
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE/REPLY TO APPELLEE'S JOINT RESPONSE TO PREVENT A MANIFEST INJUSTICE ANDMOTION FOR SANCTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Elaine A. Barbour
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-20
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO STRIKE / OBJECTION/ REPLY TO "APPELLEES' JOINT RESONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE/ REPLY TO APELLEES' RESPONSE TO PREVENT A MANIFEST INJUSTICE AND MOTINO FOR SANCTIONS"
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-06
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO ORDER UP THE COMPLETE RECORD ON APPEAL AND ANY OTHER RECORD THIS COURT DEEMS NECESSARY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-06
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT ~ APPENDIX TOMOTION TO STRIKE /REPLY TO APPELLEE'S JOINT RESPONSE to PREVENT A MANIFEST INJUSTICE AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TOAPPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Elaine A. Barbour
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Grant Miscellaneous Motion-79 ~ The motion to file an out of time response to the motion for rehearing is granted, such that the appellee response may be served within ten days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ OPPOSITION TO or MOTION TO STRIKE "APPELLEE'S JOINT MOTION TO FILE RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OUT OF TIME"
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT ~ APPELLEES' APPENDIX TO JOINT MOTION TO FILE RESPONSETO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OUT OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Elaine A. Barbour
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ APPELLEES' JOINT MOTION TO FILE RESPONSE TOAPPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OUT OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Elaine A. Barbour
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ NOTICE OF 6TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL'S ACCEPTANCE OF PLAINTIFF'S/ APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FL. R. CIV. P. 9.350
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-25
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO CLARIFY THE COURT'S 09/19/23 ORDER , FOR REHEARING, CERTIFICATION, and WRITTEN OPINION respective of providing a knowing , voluntary, and intelligent waiver of appeal,
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-19
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ NARDELLA, WHITE, AND SMITH, JJ.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The emergency motion to lift stay is denied
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY ~ REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S/ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S "EMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL or NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UPON DENIAL OF LIFT OF LOWER COURT STAY" with appendix PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 08/15/23
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-25
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE ORANGE COUNTY'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'SMOTION SEEKING REVIEW OF THE STAY ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Elaine A. Barbour
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER ~ Within ten days from the date of this order, appellees shall respond tothe motion seeking review of the stay order pursuant to rule 9.310. Theresponse shall specifically address and clarify the relationship of partial finaljudgment on appeal as to certain parties with the remaining matters to bedetermined in the lower tribunal in regarding other parties in regard to the staythat was entered by the lower tribunal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-14
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL or NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UPON DENIAL OF LIFT OF LOWER COURT STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal ~ AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL OF PARTIAL FINAL ORDERS DESIGNATED AS FINAL ORDERS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ MOTION TO STAY APPEAL UNTIL RESOLUTION OF 6D23-2688 AND 6D23-2794 OR NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL only UPON a procedurally created REQUIREMENT OF THE COURT IN CASE 6D23-2688 AND 6D23-2794 TO DO SO TO MAINTAIN THOSE CASES (6D23-2688 AND 6D23-2794) and RESPONSE TO ORDER DATED 07/17/23
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Elaine A. Barbour
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER ~ The appellant has appealed two final judgments of the trial court, filedon June 6, 2023, and June 20, 2023. The appellant has additionally challenged both judgments by motions for rehearing filed in the trial court, on June 6, 2023 (with multiple copies subsequently filed), and June 26, 2023.The court is treating this case as a final appeal. However, because rendition of the judgments has been tolled due to the filing of the motions for rehearing, the appeal shall be held in abeyance. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(h)(1)(B), (2)(A), (C). The appellant shall notify this court upon the disposition of the motions for rehearing or shall file a status report within 30 days of the date of this order,whichever occurs first.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
NF:Not Required
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-10
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ WITH ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-01
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order SC2024-0808 "Pursuant to this Court's order dated October 16, 2024, the "Motion for Rehearing, Clarification, Written Opinion" is hereby stricken as unauthorized."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion SC2024-0808 "To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, and 6D2023-2794, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2024-0795 and 6D2024-0924, the petition is denied without prejudice. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.250(a)(2). The petition is otherwise denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All other requests are denied, and no motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be considered by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-06
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order (Disposition) "To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Sixth District Court of Appeal to rule in case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the petition is hereby denied without prejudice. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin 2.250(a)(2). To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to rule in case number 6D2023-3019, the appeal is hereby dismissed as unauthorized. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 2014). To the extent that Petitioner seeks relief against the trial court, the petition is hereby dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the district court. Petitioner's motion to stay mandate of lower tribunal is denied. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Order Denying Stay ~ The motion for stay of the appeal in 6D23-3019 or alternative conditional voluntary dismissal of the appeal is denied without prejudice to appellant to either file an unconditional notice of voluntary dismissal of the appeal or to seek to lift the trial court’s July 12, 2023, order staying matters pending the resolution of the appeal of the partial final judgment—which is pending in 6D23-3019—through the review mechanism provided in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310 within this appeal. The proceedings in 6D23-2898, 6D23-2688, or 6D23-2794 are all original writs that do not impact the lower tribunal’s concurrent jurisdiction, and review of the order of stay is therefore appropriately considered within 6D23-3019, the only appeal proceeding under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(1)(A) and 9.110.
|
|
|
|
VINODH RAGHUBIR VS ALLIANCE ONE INC., ET AL
|
6D2023-2898
|
2023-06-23
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2022CA007974
|
Parties
| Name |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DBPR
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JULIE OKANE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SHANNON LAURIE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - ORANGE COUNTY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JAMES KRANER
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
JESSICA SCHWIETERMAN, A.A.G., ROBERTA W. JOHNSON, ESQ., WILLIAM E. LAWTON, ESQ., BRANDON ACEVEDO, ESQ., BONNIE JEAN PARRISH, A.A.G., ANNA MOMPREMIER, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Renee A. Roche
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HON. JAMES A. YANCEY
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-09-08
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-08
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The petition for writ of prohibition and motion for rehearing having been denied, the emergency amended motion to lift the stay filed in 6D23-2898 is also denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
denial of writ rehearing ~ The emergency motion for rehearing, clarification, certification, and written opinion is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ AMENDEDEMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The emergency motion to lift stay is denied in moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing ~ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR REHEARING , CLARIFICATION, CERTIFICATION , and WRITTEN OPINION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-26
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY ~ INDIGENCY STATUS NOT SPECIFIED SIGNED 8/30/22
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
fee - writ; pro se
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-23
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY ~ TOO OLD
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-23
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-23
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
denial of prohibition ~ The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. See McCone v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., 175 So. 3d 905, 905-06 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Leila Corp. of St. Pete v. Ossi, 144 So. 3d 644, 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). The emergency motion to lift stay is denied in moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge ~ STARGEL AND NARDELLA, JJ., AND LAMBERT, B.D., ASSOCIATE JUDGE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
|
|
VINODH RAGHUBIR VS ALLIANCE ONE INC., ET AL
|
6D2023-2794
|
2023-06-09
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2022CA007974
|
Parties
| Name |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JAMES KRANER
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JULIE OKANE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SHANNON LAURIE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DBPR
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ANNA MOMPREMIER, ESQ.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY COMPANY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
ATTORNEY GENERAL, ROBERTA W. JOHNSON, ESQ., JESSICA SCHWIETERMAN, A.A.G., WILLIAM E. LAWTON, ESQ., Bonnie Jean Parrish, BRANDON ACEVEDO, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Renee A. Roche
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HON. JAMES A. YANCEY
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-10-09
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Mail Returned
|
| Description |
RETURNED MAIL RECEIVED ON 10/7/24 - COPY OF ORDER AE'S ANNA MOMPREMIER DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 - RETURN LABEL STATES "RETURN TO SENDER" NOT DELIVERABLE - UNABLE TO FORWARD. FILED EG
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-19
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-01
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order SC2024-0808 "Pursuant to this Court's order dated October 16, 2024, the "Motion for Rehearing, Clarification, Written Opinion" is hereby stricken as unauthorized."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-29
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court SC2024-1548
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion SC2024-0808 "To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, and 6D2023-2794, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2024-0795 and 6D2024-0924, the petition is denied without prejudice. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.250(a)(2). The petition is otherwise denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All other requests are denied, and no motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be considered by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-25
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
| Description |
FLSC LETTER "Dear Vinodh M. Raghubir: In response to your correspondence received on September 24, 2024, please be advised that you appear to be seeking review of Vinodh Raghubir v. Alliance One Inc., et al., Case Nos. 6D2023-2688 & 6D2023-2794. You have already sought review of that district court decision in Vinodh G. Raghubir, et al. v. Alliance One, et al., Case No. SC2024-1331, which is final in this Court. No further pleadings seeking discretionary review can be filed in reference to the above referenced case numbers "
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-13
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion: "Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the 6th District
Court of Appeal on August 15, 2024, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279
(Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ'g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained."
by the Court.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ NOTICE OF 6TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL'S ACCEPTANCE OF PLAINTIFF'S/ APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FL. R. CIV. P. 9.350
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-09
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-30
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Mail Returned
|
| Description |
Mail Returned - Shannon Laurie's copy of August 15, 2024 order was returned to clerk's office. Postal note on envelope reads: Return to sender - insufficient address - Unable to forward.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
PETITIONER'S MOTION for REHEARING EN BANC, CERTIFICATION, WRITTEN OPINION, AND CLARIFICATION ,SWORN STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE and PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
In recognition of the return of jurisdiction to the lower tribunal based on the finality of the appeal in 6D23-3019 as of August 14, 2024, such that the lower tribunal can resume action on any pending matters that remain before it pursuant to its prior stay order, the consolidated petitions for writ of mandamus in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are denied without prejudice to seek further relief should the lower tribunal fail to lift the stay and proceed on the remaining matters upon motion filed in the lower tribunal.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
FLSC ORDER: "Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because this Court has determined that it would be helpful to the resolution of this case to have the benefit of a response from the lower tribunal regarding the
status of consolidated case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the Sixth District Court of Appeal is requested to file a response. The response shall be served on or before August 22, 2024. The petitioner may file his reply on or before September 3, 2024."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court - PETITION (MANDAMUS) SC2024-0808
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-06
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order (Disposition) "To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Sixth District Court of Appeal to rule in case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the petition is hereby denied without prejudice. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin 2.250(a)(2). To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to rule in case number 6D2023-3019, the appeal is hereby dismissed as unauthorized. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 2014). To the extent that Petitioner seeks relief against the trial court, the petition is hereby dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the district court. Petitioner's motion to stay mandate of lower tribunal is denied. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL PETITION ~ SC ACNOWLEDGMENT LETTER
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Appendix
|
| Description |
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT ~ SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT AND APPENDIX TO PETITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The emergency motions and amended emergency motions filed in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AS TO RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER DATED 07/27/23
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER DATED 07/27/23 AND MOTION TO CLARIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ AMENDEDEMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-26
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY ~ INDIGENCY STATUS NOT SPECIFIED - SIGNED 8/30/22
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-23
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1 ~ entered in error
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed ~ AMENDED PETTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-12
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY ~ TOO OLD, ALSO NOT MARKED INDIGENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
fee - writ; pro se
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-24
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
**SEE AMENDED/CORRECTED ORDER**
The portion of the motions seeking rehearing en banc are stricken as insufficient, see Fla. R. App. P. 9331, and treated as motions for rehearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330. The motions for rehearing, certification, written opinion clarification, and sworn statement of the evidence are denied.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Consolidation
|
| Description |
Consolidation-130 ~ In case number 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794, petitioner seeks to compel the lower tribunal to set a trial for certain defendants and to compel ruling on a motion for discovery. In light of the partial final judgments now pending in subsequently filed appeal 6D23-3019, it is not clear what motions that are the subject of the mandamus petitions in these two cases remain pending. Accordingly, the proceedings in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are consolidated, and petitioner shall show cause within twenty days from the date of this order why the consolidated petition should not be dismissed as moot as to the motions to set trial for particularly named defendants or other pending discovery motions by identifying which motions remain pending in the lower tribunal following the entry of the partial final judgments on appeal in 6D23-3019. The emergency motions to lift stay filed in the subject petitions for writ of mandamus do not contain a copy of any written order imposing a stay for this court’s review and are therefore denied without prejudice to refile a motion with a copy of the lower tribunal’s order entering stay. It is noted that the matters that are the subject of 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794, as original proceedings filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, do not otherwise preclude the lower tribunal from ruling on any motions that remain pending on the docket and providing this court with a copy of those orders.
|
|
|
|
VINODH RAGHUBIR, Petitioner(s) v. JULIE OKANE, ORANGE COUNTY, ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, JESSICA SCHWIETERMAN, A.A.G., ALLIANCE ONE INC., Bonnie Jean Parrish, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE, SHANNON LAURIE, ANNA MOMPREMIER, ESQ., ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ORANGE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - ORANGE COUNTY, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, DBPR, Respondent(s).
|
6D2023-2688
|
2023-05-29
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
6th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County
2022CA007974
|
Parties
| Name |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JAMES KRANER
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JULIE OKANE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY COMPANY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
JESSICA SCHWIETERMAN, A.A.G.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
WILLIAM E. LAWTON, ESQ., ATTORNEY GENERAL, BRANDON ACEVEDO, ESQ., ROBERTA W. JOHNSON, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
Bonnie Jean Parrish
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SHANNON LAURIE
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ANNA MOMPREMIER, ESQ.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ORANGE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - ORANGE COUNTY
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DBPR
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Elaine Agnes Barbour
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Renee A. Roche
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HON. JAMES A. YANCEY
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-11-19
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-01
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order SC2024-0808 "Pursuant to this Court's order dated October 16, 2024, the "Motion for Rehearing, Clarification, Written Opinion" is hereby stricken as unauthorized."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-29
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court SC2024-1548
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AS TO RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER DATED 07/27/23
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-09
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Mail Returned
|
| Description |
RETURNED MAIL RECEIVED ON 10/7/24 - COPY OF ORDER AE'S ANNA MOMPREMIER DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 - RETURN LABEL STATES "RETURN TO SENDER" NOT DELIVERABLE - UNABLE TO FORWARD. FILED EG
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-25
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
| Description |
FLSC LETTER "Dear Vinodh M. Raghubir: In response to your correspondence received on September 24, 2024, please be advised that you appear to be seeking review of Vinodh Raghubir v. Alliance One Inc., et al., Case Nos. 6D2023-2688 & 6D2023-2794. You have already sought review of that district court decision in Vinodh G. Raghubir, et al. v. Alliance One, et al., Case No. SC2024-1331, which is final in this Court. No further pleadings seeking discretionary review can be filed in reference to the above referenced case numbers "
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-24
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-13
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion: "Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the 6th District
Court of Appeal on August 15, 2024, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279
(Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ'g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained."
by the Court.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-12
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
**SEE AMENDED/CORRECTED ORDER**
The portion of the motions seeking rehearing en banc are stricken as insufficient, see Fla. R. App. P. 9331, and treated as motions for rehearing pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330. The motions for rehearing, certification, written opinion clarification, and sworn statement of the evidence are denied.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-09
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-30
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Mail Returned
|
| Description |
Mail Returned - Shannon Laurie's copy of August 15, 2024 order was returned to clerk's office. Postal note on envelope reads: Return to sender - insufficient address - Unable to forward.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
PETITIONER'S MOTION for REHEARING EN BANC, CERTIFICATION, WRITTEN OPINION, AND CLARIFICATION ,SWORN STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE and PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
FLSC ORDER: "Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because this Court has determined that it would be helpful to the resolution of this case to have the benefit of a response from the lower tribunal regarding the
status of consolidated case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the Sixth District Court of Appeal is requested to file a response. The response shall be served on or before August 22, 2024. The petitioner may file his reply on or before September 3, 2024."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court - PETITION (MANDAMUS) SC2024-0808
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-05-06
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order (Disposition) "To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Sixth District Court of Appeal to rule in case numbers 6D2023-2688 and 6D2023-2794, the petition is hereby denied without prejudice. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin 2.250(a)(2). To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to rule in case number 6D2023-3019, the appeal is hereby dismissed as unauthorized. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 2014). To the extent that Petitioner seeks relief against the trial court, the petition is hereby dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the district court. Petitioner's motion to stay mandate of lower tribunal is denied. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-02-15
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL PETITION ~ SC ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Appendix
|
| Description |
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT ~ SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT AND APPENDIX TO PETITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ NOTICE OF 6TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL'S ACCEPTANCE OF PLAINTIFF'S/ APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FL. R. CIV. P. 9.350
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The emergency motions and amended emergency motions filed in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ AMENDEDEMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Emergency Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT THE STAY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-31
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
TIFFANY RUSSELL, CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
fee - writ; pro se
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-30
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-29
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-29
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Opinion SC2024-0808 "To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2023-3019, 6D2023-2688, and 6D2023-2794, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks a writ compelling the Sixth DCA to rule in case numbers 6D2024-0795 and 6D2024-0924, the petition is denied without prejudice. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.250(a)(2). The petition is otherwise denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). All other requests are denied, and no motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be considered by this Court."
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
In recognition of the return of jurisdiction to the lower tribunal based on the finality of the appeal in 6D23-3019 as of August 14, 2024, such that the lower tribunal can resume action on any pending matters that remain before it pursuant to its prior stay order, the consolidated petitions for writ of mandamus in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are denied without prejudice to seek further relief should the lower tribunal fail to lift the stay and proceed on the remaining matters upon motion filed in the lower tribunal.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER DATED 07/27/23 AND MOTION TO CLARIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VINODH RAGHUBIR
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Consolidation
|
| Description |
Consolidation-130 ~ In case number 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794, petitioner seeks to compel the lower tribunal to set a trial for certain defendants and to compel ruling on a motion for discovery. In light of the partial final judgments now pending in subsequently filed appeal 6D23-3019, it is not clear what motions that are the subject of the mandamus petitions in these two cases remain pending. Accordingly, the proceedings in 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794 are consolidated, and petitioner shall show cause within twenty days from the date of this order why the consolidated petition should not be dismissed as moot as to the motions to set trial for particularly named defendants or other pending discovery motions by identifying which motions remain pending in the lower tribunal following the entry of the partial final judgments on appeal in 6D23-3019. The emergency motions to lift stay filed in the subject petitions for writ of mandamus do not contain a copy of any written order imposing a stay for this court’s review and are therefore denied without prejudice to refile a motion with a copy of the lower tribunal’s order entering stay. It is noted that the matters that are the subject of 6D23-2688 and 6D23-2794, as original proceedings filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, do not otherwise preclude the lower tribunal from ruling on any motions that remain pending on the docket and providing this court with a copy of those orders.
|
|
|
