Inspection Type |
Referral
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2014-02-18
|
Emphasis |
L: EISAOF
|
Case Closed |
2016-06-07
|
Related Activity
Type |
Referral |
Activity Nr |
872408 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100095 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-11 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-05-29 |
Current Penalty |
940.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1700.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: On or about February 18, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop a hearing conservation program where employees in the grinding room were exposed to continuous noise at 68.41% of the action level of noise exposure (8-hour time weighted average of 85 dBA) or the equivalent sound level of approximately 87.2 dBA during the 391-minute sampling period; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 89 minutes not sampled. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 I |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-11 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: On or about February 18, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide Appendix D to employees who wear N95 respirators while performing grinding and sanding of metal parts in the grinding room and to employees using a full face respirator when testing system leaks with nitrous oxide gas. |
|
Citation ID |
02002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 II |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-11 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: On or about February 18, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not implement elements of a written program to determine employee's medical ability to wear a full face respirator and train employee on the cleaning, storage, and maintenance of the respirator. |
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Complete
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2014-02-10
|
Emphasis |
N: AMPUTATE, P: AMPUTATE
|
Case Closed |
2016-06-07
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100136 A |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-18 |
Current Penalty |
880.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards: a. On or about February 10, 2014, at the warehouse area of the above addressed jobsite, an employee who handled merchandise with weights varying in between 16.2 lbs to 67.0 lbs was not provided with steel toe footwear, exposing the employee to the risk of receiving foot injuries. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100147 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-23 |
Current Penalty |
1100.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a. On or about December 10, 2013, at the hot shop area, of the above addressed jobsite, the employer failed to establish an energy control program for the control of multiple energy sources as applicable for an authorized employee to rebuild hydraulic cylinders of a HYD-MECH H-14 bandsaw, which exposed the employee to a caught by hazard. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100212 B |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Current Penalty |
660.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: a. On or about January 27, 2014, at the CNC department of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a struck by hazard while working with a drill press (i.e. Accura Machine Co., Model No, SC-30, Serial No. 037911) that was not anchored. |
|
Citation ID |
01004 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100242 B |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-10 |
Current Penalty |
660.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: a. On or about February 10, 2014, at the nitrous assembly area of the above addressed worksite, an employee was exposed to a struck by hazard while using compressed air for cleaning purposes at 60 psi. |
|
Citation ID |
01005 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100304 G05 |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-10 |
Current Penalty |
880.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: a. On or about February 10, 2014, at the nitrous assembly area of the above jobsite, a hot air gun (i.e. Model #750) lacked a ground prong on its attachment plug, exposing employees to an electrical hazard. |
|
Citation ID |
01006 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100305 G02 III |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-14 |
Current Penalty |
880.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a. On or about December 10, 2014, at the CNC department of the above jobsite, a welding machine lacked strain relief where its electrical cord entered into the attachment plug, exposing employees to an electrical hazard. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-06-16 |
Current Penalty |
2200.0 |
Initial Penalty |
4000.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
4 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. On or about February 10, 2014, at the machine room of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a milling machine (i.e. Lac-un Republic, Model FTV-2) that lacked a guard. b. On or about February 10, 2014, at the machine room of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a milling machine (i.e. Lac-un Republic, Model FTV-2) that lacked a guard. c. On or about February 3, 2014, at the CNC department of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a milling machine (i.e. Lac-un Republic, Model FTV-2) that lacked a guard. d. On or about January 20, 2014, at the CNC department of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a drill press (i.e. Accura Machine Co., Model No, SC-30, Serial No. 037911) that lacked a guard. Wilson Manifolds Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315358358, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on December 12, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at 4700 NE 11th Avenue, Oakland Park, FL 33334. |
|
Citation ID |
03001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19040032 A04 |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-10 |
Current Penalty |
200.0 |
Initial Penalty |
400.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
11 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(4): The employer did not post an OSHA 300A Form or equivalent by February 1 thru April 30: a. On or about February 10, 2014 at the above addressed jobsite, the employer failed to post an OSHA-300A for year 2013. |
|
Citation ID |
03002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about February 10, 2014, at the above referenced jobsite, the employer had not developed and implemented a hazard communication program for protecting employees from the hazards of chemicals (i.e. argon, helium, nitrogen, WD-40 lubricant, etc.) that they work with on a daily basis. |
|
Citation ID |
03003 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101200 G08 |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): a. On or about February 10, 2014, at the above referenced jobsite, the safety data sheets (i.e. argon, helium, nitrogen, WD-40 lubricant, etc.) for chemicals used by employees on a daily basis were not accessible. |
|
Citation ID |
03004 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-04-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-04-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about February 10, 2014, at the above referenced jobsite, the employer had not provided information and training as required to employees that worked with hazardous chemicals (i.e. argon, helium, nitrogen, WD-40 lubricant, etc.) on a daily basis, as evidenced by, among other conditions; employees lacked knowledge of the details and availability of the company's hazard communication program; employees lacked knowledge of availability of the required safety data sheets, etc. |
|
|