344367313
|
0420600
|
2019-10-09
|
6160 S ORANGE AVENUE, ORLANDO, FL, 32809
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2020-03-27
|
Emphasis |
L: LEAD, N: LEAD
|
Case Closed |
2020-05-19
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
1500235 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101030 C01 I |
Issuance Date |
2020-04-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2020-04-28 |
Current Penalty |
3000.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3393.0 |
Final Order |
2020-04-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: (a) Facility - there was no written Exposure Control Plan and employees had occupational exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials, on or about October 9, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2020-04-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2020-04-28 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8482.0 |
Final Order |
2020-04-27 |
Nr Instances |
3 |
Nr Exposed |
12 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) On the refrigerator handle, 2.938 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about October 9, 2019. b) On the countertop in front of the coffee machine, 23.57 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about October 9, 2019. c) On the back door panic bar, 20.8 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about October 9, 2019. Oak Ridge Gun Range was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1381851, citation number 1, item number 4 and was affirmed as a final order on July 31, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 6160 S. Orange Ave., Orlando, FL 32809. |
|
Citation ID |
02002A |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J01 I |
Issuance Date |
2020-04-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2020-04-28 |
Current Penalty |
6161.4 |
Initial Penalty |
11876.0 |
Final Order |
2020-04-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): A medical surveillance program was not instituted for all employee(s) who were, or could be exposed to lead above the action level for more that thirty days per year: a) Facility - An employee was exposed to 31.06 ug/m3 for an 8 hour TWA and was not provided with any type of medical surveillance, on or about October 9, 2019. Oak Ridge Gun Range was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(I), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1381851, citation number 1, item number 6a and was affirmed as a final order on July 31, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 6160 S. Orange Ave., Orlando, FL 32809. |
|
Citation ID |
02002B |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J02 I |
Issuance Date |
2020-04-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2020-04-28 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2020-04-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(2)(i): The employer did not make available biological monitoring, including blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) levels for each employee covered under 29 CFR 1910.1025 (j)(1)(i): a) Facility - An employee was exposed to 31.06 ug/m3 for an 8 hour TWA and was not provided with blood lead or zinc protoporphyrin monitoring, on or about October 9, 2019. Oak Ridge Gun Range was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1381851, citation number 1, item number 6b and was affirmed as a final order on July 31, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 6160 S. Orange Ave., Orlando, FL 32809. |
|
|
343818514
|
0420600
|
2019-02-28
|
6160 S ORANGE AVENUE, ORLANDO, FL, 32809
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2019-05-08
|
Emphasis |
L: LEAD, N: LEAD
|
Case Closed |
2019-08-07
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
1409725 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 F02 I |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
2652.0 |
Initial Penalty |
5304.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(2)(i): The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1025 to use a respirator: a) Range - during shooting range duties, employees were required to wear a respirator and the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program or completed the elements that were required to be included, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Range - During shooting range cleaning, employees were required to wear a respirator and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01001C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Range - Employees required to wear a respirator during range cleaning did not have fit-testing prior to the use of a respirator, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01001D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 F03 I C |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(3)(i)(C): The employer did not provide HEPA filters for powered and non-powered air-purifying respirators: a) Range - During shooting range cleaning, employees wore Uline N95 dust masks and Gerson half-face air purifying respirators with organic vapor cartridges, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
2652.0 |
Initial Penalty |
5304.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a) Lobby and range - An employee was exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 89.21 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, approximately 1.78 times the permissible exposure level of 50.0 ug/m3. Sampling was performed for 445 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 35 minute period not sampled. This violation was discovered on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E04 I |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
2652.0 |
Initial Penalty |
5304.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(4)(i): When ventilation was used to control exposure to lead, measurements which demonstrate the effectiveness of the system in controlling exposures were not made at least every three months: a) Range- Ventilation was provided in the range to control lead levels and no measurements were being taken to determine the effectiveness of the ventilation, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01004 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
1894.5 |
Initial Penalty |
3789.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
5 |
Nr Exposed |
12 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) On the microwave handle, 4.81 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. b) On the refrigerator handle, 3.965 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. c) On the microwave number pad, 4.775 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. d) On the computer mouse for the corner computer behind the counter, 2.2225 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. e) On the back door panic bar, 231.8 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01005A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I02 I |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
2652.0 |
Initial Penalty |
5304.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(i): Clean change rooms were not provided for employees exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: a) Range - No change rooms were provided for an employee exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 89.21 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01005B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 I |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-01 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift: a) Range - No shower were provided for an employee exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 89.21 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01006A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J01 I |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-22 |
Current Penalty |
2652.0 |
Initial Penalty |
5304.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): A medical surveillance program was not instituted for all employee(s) who were, or could be exposed to lead above the action level for more that thirty days per year: a) Facility - An employee was exposed to 89.21 ug/m3 for an 8 hour TWA and was not provided with any type of medical surveillance, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
Citation ID |
01006B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J02 I |
Issuance Date |
2019-07-08 |
Abatement Due Date |
2019-08-22 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2019-07-31 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
6 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(2)(i): The employer did not make available biological monitoring, including blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) levels for each employee covered under 29 CFR 1910.1025 (j)(1)(i): a) Facility - An employee was exposed to 89.21 ug/m3 for an 8 hour TWA and was not provided with zinc protoporphyrin monitoring, on or about February 28, 2019. |
|
|
101827038
|
0420600
|
1986-08-22
|
632 W. OAK RIDGE RD., ORLANDO, FL, 32809
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
1986-08-27
|
Case Closed |
1987-03-17
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
71256879 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-11-17 |
Current Penalty |
150.0 |
Initial Penalty |
150.0 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-11-17 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
Citation ID |
01001C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 F02 III |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
Citation ID |
01001D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 G01 |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
Citation ID |
01001E |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
Citation ID |
01001F |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I02 I |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-11-03 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
Citation ID |
01001G |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 II |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-11-03 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
Citation ID |
01001H |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J01 I |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
Citation ID |
01001I |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 II |
Issuance Date |
1986-09-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
1986-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
|
|