| Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE21-022147
|
Parties
| Name |
CRIDAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Robin Felicity Hazel
|
|
| Name |
W AVIATION, LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Mark B. Goldstein, Bruce Botsford, Noam J. Cohen
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Michael A. Robinson
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2022-04-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ Upon consideration of appellee’s April 4, 2022 response, and appellant’s March 28, 2022 status report and April 11, 2022 notice of filing, it is ORDERED that appellant’s March 24, 2022 motion for rehearing is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-11
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ ORDER ON EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL ENFORCEMENT OF COURT ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cridan Technologies, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
W Aviation, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-28
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cridan Technologies, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-24
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cridan Technologies, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-21
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissal ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s February 21, 2022 response to this court’s February 16, 2022 order to show cause and appellee’s March 14, 2022 reply, this appeal is dismissed as moot. See Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211, 212 (Fla. 1992). Further,ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellee’s March 14, 2022 response, appellant’s February 21, 2022 motion to stay is denied as moot.GROSS, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-21
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ AMENDED.
|
| On Behalf Of |
W Aviation, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO STAY.
|
| On Behalf Of |
W Aviation, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee's March 8, 2022 notice is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
W Aviation, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s February 21, 2022 motion to stay and the February 21, 2022 response to order to show cause.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-21
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cridan Technologies, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cridan Technologies, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-18
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cridan Technologies, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the January 7, 2022 order is an appealable nonfinal order pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(3)(B) or Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cridan Technologies, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Cridan Technologies, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellant to File Response ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s January 18, 2022 jurisdictional brief, this appeal shall proceed. Further, ORDERED that appellant shall file a response within ten (10) days and show cause why the above–styled case should not be dismissed as moot, as the January 7, 2022 order directs appellant to migrate data and services within seventeen (17) days commencing on January 5, 2022. See Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211, 212 (Fla. 1992) (“An issue is moot when the controversy has been so fully resolved that a judicial determination can have no actual effect . . . A moot case generally will be dismissed.”) (internal citations omitted).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
|
