Search icon

COAST TO COAST GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC.

Company Details

Entity Name: COAST TO COAST GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Florida Profit Corporation
Status: Active
Date Filed: 08 Mar 1999 (26 years ago)
Document Number: P99000021450
FEI/EIN Number 74-2913445
Address: 613 SOUTH 21 AVENUE, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020
Mail Address: 613 SOUTH 21 AVENUE, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020
ZIP code: 33020
County: Broward
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Agent

Name Role Address
NIESEN, PRICE, WORTHY, CAMPO PA Agent 5216 SW 91ST DR, GAINESVILLE, FL 32608

President

Name Role Address
LEVI, YANIEVE President 613 SOUTH 21 AVENUE, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED 2017-03-13 NIESEN, PRICE, WORTHY, CAMPO PA No data
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED 2017-03-13 5216 SW 91ST DR, GAINESVILLE, FL 32608 No data

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2024-03-04
ANNUAL REPORT 2023-02-14
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-02-15
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-02-04
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-01-20
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-02-08
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-01-12
Reg. Agent Change 2017-03-13
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-02-10
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-03-14

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
345624209 0418800 2021-11-03 6881 SW 27TH STREET, MIAMI, FL, 33155
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2021-11-03
Case Closed 2022-01-27

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 1829715
Safety Yes
344672472 0418800 2020-03-04 9195 COLLINS AVE, SURFSIDE, FL, 33154
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2020-03-04
Emphasis N: RCS-NEP
Case Closed 2021-09-23

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 1547235
Safety Yes
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261153 C01
Issuance Date 2020-09-04
Abatement Due Date 2020-10-01
Current Penalty 3435.0
Initial Penalty 5725.0
Final Order 2020-09-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1)(x): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, using jackhammers and handheld powered chipping tools, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. (a) On or about March 4, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer did not implement the use of either a water delivery system or shroud and dust collection system, with handheld powered chipping tools used by employees completing concrete restoration tasks on residential balconies. (b) On or about June 18, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer did not implement the use of either a water delivery system or shroud and dust collection system, with handheld powered chipping tools used by employees completing concrete restoration tasks on residential balconies.
Citation ID 01001B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261153 D02 I
Issuance Date 2020-09-04
Abatement Due Date 2020-10-01
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2020-09-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section: (a) On or about March 4, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer did not asses silica exposure of employees using chipping tools during concrete restoration operations that consisted of chipping and grinding concrete balconies of a residential building. (b) On or about June 18, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer did not asses silica exposure of employees using grinding tools during concrete restoration operations that consisted of chipping and grinding concrete balconies of a residential building.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261153 G01
Issuance Date 2020-09-04
Abatement Due Date 2020-10-01
Current Penalty 3435.0
Initial Penalty 5725.0
Final Order 2020-09-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: On or about June 18, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer did not develop a written exposure control plan for employees exposed to silica above the action level of 25 ug/m3 when performing concrete restoration operations that consisted of chipping and grinding concrete balconies of a residential building.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261153 H01 I
Issuance Date 2020-09-04
Current Penalty 3435.0
Initial Penalty 5725.0
Final Order 2020-09-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1153(h)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who was required under this section to use a respirator for 30 or more days per year: On or about March 4, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to employees utilizing handheld tools including, but not limited to, grinders to complete concrete restoration tasks on residential balconies with exposure to crystalline respirable silica dust above the action level.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19100134 E01
Issuance Date 2020-09-04
Current Penalty 266.7
Initial Penalty 381.0
Final Order 2020-09-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.1153(e)(1)): On or about March 4, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation at no cost to employees required to wear respirators while utilizing chipping tools to complete concrete restoration tasks on residential balconies where silica exposure occurred. The Coast to Coast General Contractors, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.134(e)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1203604, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/12/2017, with respect to a jobsite located at 100 Lincoln Road Miami Beach, FL 33140.
Citation ID 02002
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19100134 F02
Issuance Date 2020-09-04
Current Penalty 266.7
Initial Penalty 381.0
Final Order 2020-09-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about March 4, 2020 and prior to, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not conduct fit testing for employees required to wear respirators, when performing concrete restoration tasks such as, but not limited to, chipping concrete balconies of a residential building. The Coast to Coast General Contractors, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.134 (f)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1203604, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/12/2017, with respect to a jobsite located at 100 Lincoln Road, Miami Beach, FL 33140.
Citation ID 03001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 G01 I
Issuance Date 2020-09-04
Abatement Due Date 2020-10-01
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2020-09-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i): 29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i): The employer permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or interfered with valve function: (a) On or about March 4, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer permitted an employee required to wear respirators to have facial hair, when performing concrete restoration tasks such as, but not limited to, chipping concrete balconies of a residential building. (b) On or about June 18, 2020 and prior to, at the jobsite 9200 Collins Ave, Miami Beach, FL, the employer permitted an employee wear a face covering between their skin and the respirator that they are required to wear when performing concrete restoration tasks such as, but not limited to, grinding concrete on balconies of a residential building.
344670922 0418800 2020-03-03 9195 COLLINS AVE, SURFSIDE, FL, 33154
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2020-03-03
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2021-05-21

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 1548720
Safety Yes
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19260501 B01
Issuance Date 2020-04-24
Abatement Due Date 2020-05-20
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2020-05-26
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: On or about March 3, 2020, at 9195 Collins AVE, Surfside, Florida, an employee engaged in concrete restoration was exposed to a 6-foot fall hazard without means of fall protection.
342205390 0418800 2017-03-24 445 GRAND BAY DRIVE, KEY BISCAYNE, FL, 33149
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2017-03-24
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2017-10-31

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 1194693
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 F03
Issuance Date 2017-08-07
Current Penalty 3984.0
Initial Penalty 3984.0
Final Order 2017-09-05
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Related Event Code (REC) Referral
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: On or about 03/23/2017, at the above addressed worksite, the controls of a power operated hoist were not inspected for dried plaster on the controls exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
342036043 0418800 2017-01-18 100 LINCOLN ROAD, MIAMI BEACH, FL, 33140
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2017-03-02
Emphasis L: SILICA, N: SILICA
Case Closed 2017-12-12

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 1174394
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 E01
Issuance Date 2017-06-12
Current Penalty 447.0
Initial Penalty 447.0
Final Order 2017-07-11
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about 03/02/2017, at the above address jobsite, employees required to wear a filtering face piece respirator while performing chipping and grinding were not given a medical evaluation.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 F02
Issuance Date 2017-06-12
Current Penalty 447.0
Initial Penalty 447.0
Final Order 2017-07-11
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about 03/02/2017, at the above address jobsite, employees required to wear a filtering face piece respirator while performing chipping and grinding were not given a fit-test.
342027943 0418800 2017-01-13 100 LINCOLN ROAD, MIAMI BEACH, FL, 33139
Inspection Type Fat/Cat
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2017-01-13
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2018-07-25

Related Activity

Type Accident
Activity Nr 1173384
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 D10
Issuance Date 2017-07-10
Abatement Due Date 2017-08-18
Current Penalty 9764.0
Initial Penalty 12675.0
Final Order 2017-07-31
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Related Event Code (REC) Accident
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(d)(10): Ropes were not inspected by a competent person prior to each workshift and replaced if any physical damage impairing the function and strength of the rope existed: On or about January 13, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were working from a swing stage scaffold with a defective wire rope that was not replaced.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B01
Issuance Date 2017-07-10
Current Penalty 6904.0
Initial Penalty 8963.0
Final Order 2017-07-31
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: On or about January 12, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees engaged in assembling a walk way were exposed to a 20-foot fall hazard without means of fall protection.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260502 D16 III
Issuance Date 2017-07-10
Abatement Due Date 2017-08-18
Current Penalty 9666.0
Initial Penalty 12548.0
Final Order 2017-07-31
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: On or about January 13, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was working from a swing stage scaffold with a personal fall arrest system that was not rigged to prevent an employee from free falling not more than 6 feet or contact with any lower level.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260502 D21
Issuance Date 2017-07-10
Abatement Due Date 2017-08-18
Current Penalty 9666.0
Initial Penalty 12548.0
Final Order 2017-07-31
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Related Event Code (REC) Accident
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: On or about January 13, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working from a swing stage scaffold was using defective components in his personal fall arrest system such as a lifeline with burned areas, severe wear and paint, and a rope grab with a broken spring that were not removed from service.
341887479 0418800 2016-11-01 1559 MICHIGAN AVENUE, MIAMI BEACH, FL, 33139
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2017-04-21
Emphasis L: HINOISE, L: SILICA
Case Closed 2018-03-15

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 1150924
Safety Yes
Health Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1188867
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 E01
Issuance Date 2017-04-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-06-26
Current Penalty 2689.0
Initial Penalty 5378.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about November 1, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees performing rebar replacement operations, and were exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Silica Crystalline Quartz, Portland Cement and Calcium Hydroxide.
Citation ID 01001B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 H01
Issuance Date 2017-04-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-06-26
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about November 1, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not provide any effective information and training on hazardous chemicals for employees performing rebar replacement operations, and were exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Silica Crystalline Quartz , Portland Cement and Calcium Hydroxide.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260095 A
Issuance Date 2017-04-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 2689.0
Initial Penalty 5378.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided: On or about November 1, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer allowed employees to work with cement mixes containing Silica Crystalline Quartz and Calcium Hydroxide without the use of gloves and/or safety goggles.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19100134 C01
Issuance Date 2017-04-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-06-26
Current Penalty 5377.5
Initial Penalty 10755.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about November 1, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear N95 Particulate Respirators while performing rebar replacement operations, and who were also required to work with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Silica Crystalline Quartz and Portland Cement. The employer was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 1910.134(c)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection #936605, Citation 1, Item 2, and was affirmed as a final order on March 18, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 600 NE 36th Street, Miami, FL 33137.
341888675 0418800 2016-11-01 1559 MICHIGAN AVE., MIAMI BEACH, FL, 33139
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2016-11-01
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2018-03-14

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 1150924
Safety Yes
Health Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1188747
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 B01
Issuance Date 2017-04-26
Current Penalty 6000.0
Initial Penalty 6972.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units: On or about November 1, 2016, at the above referenced job site, employees were exposed to a 20-foot fall hazard while working on the top of a scaffold platform performing rebar removing/replacing restoration operations adjacent to another scaffold without complete planks.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01
Issuance Date 2017-04-26
Current Penalty 6000.0
Initial Penalty 6972.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: On or about November 1, 2016, at the above referenced job site, employee was exposed to a 20-foot fall hazard while working on the top of a scaffold platform, tied off to the scaffold with a personal fall arrest system (PFAS).
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 E01
Issuance Date 2017-04-26
Current Penalty 3840.0
Initial Penalty 8365.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. On or about November 1, 2016, at the above referenced job site, employees were exposed to a 20-foot fall hazard while exiting the top of a scaffold platform without the use of an appropriate ladder.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 H02 II
Issuance Date 2017-04-26
Current Penalty 2560.0
Initial Penalty 5577.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:Note: This requirement does not apply to float (ship) scaffolds where an edging of 3/4 inch x 1 1/2 inch (2 x 4 cm) wood or equivalent was used in lieu of toeboards. On or about November 1, 2016, at the above referenced job site, employees who were working below/around supported scaffolds and were exposed to head injuries from hand tools, such as but not limited to rebar, which were being used by employees working on the second and third tier of the scaffold, which were not equipped with toe boards.
Citation ID 01005
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260454 A
Issuance Date 2017-04-26
Current Penalty 6000.0
Initial Penalty 6972.0
Final Order 2017-05-17
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about November 1, 2016, at the above referenced job site, employees were exposed to a 20-foot fall hazard while working on the top of a scaffold platform did not recognize the missing plank as a potential fall hazard.
341033124 0418800 2015-11-03 20281 E. COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, AVENTURA, FL, 33180
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2015-11-03
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2015-11-03

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 1034238
Safety Yes
339412496 0418800 2013-09-10 600 NE 36TH STREET, MIAMI, FL, 33137
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-09-11
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2014-01-13

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 849948
Safety Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 941255
Safety Yes
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2013-08-27
Emphasis L: SILICA
Case Closed 2015-01-07

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 846411
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260055 A
Issuance Date 2014-02-25
Abatement Due Date 2014-03-21
Current Penalty 1680.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2014-03-18
Nr Instances 3
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.55(a): An Employee was exposed to Crystalline Silica, at concentrations above those specified in the Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants for 1970 of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: On or about September 4, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee grinding and cutting concrete was over exposed to silica dust: An employee cutting concrete was exposed to an 8-hour Time Weighted Average of 31.1 million particles per cubic meter when the Permissible Exposure Level for this employee was 16.67 million particles per cubic meter. The employee was measured for 283 minutes with a zero dose assumed for any un-sampled period.
Citation ID 01001B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260055 B
Issuance Date 2014-02-25
Abatement Due Date 2014-03-21
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2014-03-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.55(b): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposures: On or about Setember 4, 2013, at the above addressed jobisite, an employee was cutting and grinding concrete without applying engineering or administrative controls for at least 1 employees who was exposed to silica dust. The employee's 8-hour Time Weighted Averages (TWA) exposure to Crystalline Silica was 31.1 million parts per cubic meter (mppcf). The Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) for this employee is 16.67 million parts per cubic meter (mppcf)
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 C
Issuance Date 2014-02-25
Abatement Due Date 2014-03-21
Current Penalty 1680.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2014-03-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about September 9, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear N95 filtering face piece respirator and 3M elastomeric half mask respirator with hepa filters while performing concrete cutting operation.
Citation ID 02001A
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19260052 D01
Issuance Date 2014-02-25
Abatement Due Date 2014-03-21
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2014-03-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Related Event Code (REC) Referral
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.52(d)(1): In all cases where the sound levels exceeded the values shown in Table D-2 of 29 CFR 1926.52, a continuing, effective hearing conservation program was not administered: On or about September 11, 2013 at the above address site, the employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program for an employee operating a concrete grinder, exposed to a noise dose of 134.4%, or an equivalent of 92.1 dBA, which was capable of causing permanent hearing loss. The sampling was performed for 419 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time (61 minutes).
Citation ID 02001B
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19260052 D02 II
Issuance Date 2014-02-25
Abatement Due Date 2014-03-21
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2014-03-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Related Event Code (REC) Referral
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.52(d)(2)(ii): A sample computation showing an application of the formula in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section is as follows. If the value of Fe exceeds unity (1), the exposure exceeds permissible levels. On or about September 11, 2013, at the above address site, an employee operating a concrete grinder was exposed to a noise level of 134.4%, or an equivalent of 92.1 dBA, which was capable of causing permanent hearing loss. The sampling was performed for 419 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time (61 min), this exposure exceeds unity (1) permissible level. Fe = 1.2
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-08-22
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2014-09-16

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 844447
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260502 D10
Issuance Date 2013-10-28
Current Penalty 2940.0
Initial Penalty 4900.0
Final Order 2013-11-20
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Related Event Code (REC) Complaint
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(10): Where vertical lifelines were used for fall protection, each employee was not attached to seperate lifelines: On or about August 22, 2013, at the above address site, employees exposed to potential fall hazards while performing concrete restoration work from a suspension scaffold were not attached to independent lifelines.
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-08-14
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2013-08-15

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 841112
Safety Yes
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Case Closed 2014-10-14

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 835163
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260850 B
Issuance Date 2014-01-09
Abatement Due Date 2014-01-22
Current Penalty 4851.0
Initial Penalty 6930.0
Final Order 2014-02-07
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Related Event Code (REC) Accident
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.850(b): The walls or floors were not shored or braced where employees were required to work within a damaged structure to be demolished: On or about 07/26/2013, the floor of a garage was not shored and braced while employees were working below resulting in an employee injury from a collapsed section of floor. PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2011-09-01
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2012-09-10

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2011-09-30
Abatement Due Date 2011-10-12
Current Penalty 1650.0
Initial Penalty 3300.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 05
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19260501 B01
Issuance Date 2011-09-30
Abatement Due Date 2011-10-12
Current Penalty 3960.0
Initial Penalty 6600.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 03
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2010-10-04
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2011-04-13

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01 II
Issuance Date 2010-10-15
Abatement Due Date 2010-10-20
Current Penalty 2454.0
Initial Penalty 3500.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 05

Paycheck Protection Program

Loan Number Loan Funded Date SBA Origination Office Code Loan Delivery Method Borrower Street Address
2470978504 2021-02-20 0455 PPS 613 S 21st Ave, Hollywood, FL, 33020-6905
Loan Status Date 2022-05-20
Loan Status Paid in Full
Loan Maturity in Months 60
SBA Guaranty Percentage 100
Loan Approval Amount (at origination) 1666460
Loan Approval Amount (current) 1666460
Undisbursed Amount 0
Franchise Name -
Lender Location ID 17616
Servicing Lender Name Seacoast National Bank
Servicing Lender Address 815 Colorado Ave, STUART, FL, 34994-3053
Rural or Urban Indicator U
Hubzone Y
LMI Y
Business Age Description Existing or more than 2 years old
Project Address Hollywood, BROWARD, FL, 33020-6905
Project Congressional District FL-25
Number of Employees 237
NAICS code 238110
Borrower Race Unanswered
Borrower Ethnicity Unknown/NotStated
Business Type Corporation
Originating Lender ID 458637
Originating Lender Name Seacoast National Bank
Originating Lender Address Coral Gables, FL
Gender Unanswered
Veteran Unanswered
Forgiveness Amount 1685948.32
Forgiveness Paid Date 2022-04-28
8521037005 2020-04-08 0455 PPP 613 S 21ST AVE, HOLLYWOOD, FL, 33020-6905
Loan Status Date 2022-02-24
Loan Status Paid in Full
Loan Maturity in Months 24
SBA Guaranty Percentage 100
Loan Approval Amount (at origination) 1666400
Loan Approval Amount (current) 1666400
Undisbursed Amount 0
Franchise Name -
Lender Location ID 17616
Servicing Lender Name Seacoast National Bank
Servicing Lender Address 815 Colorado Ave, STUART, FL, 34994-3053
Rural or Urban Indicator U
Hubzone Y
LMI Y
Business Age Description Existing or more than 2 years old
Project Address HOLLYWOOD, BROWARD, FL, 33020-6905
Project Congressional District FL-25
Number of Employees 237
NAICS code 236210
Borrower Race Unanswered
Borrower Ethnicity Unknown/NotStated
Business Type Corporation
Originating Lender ID 458637
Originating Lender Name Seacoast National Bank
Originating Lender Address Coral Gables, FL
Gender Unanswered
Veteran Unanswered
Forgiveness Amount 1680101.51
Forgiveness Paid Date 2021-02-12

Date of last update: 01 Feb 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State