| Docket Date |
2020-03-25
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-25
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Order Denying Petition for Writ - Mandamus ~ ORDERED that the January 21, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Further,ORDERED that petitioner’s March 23, 2020 motion for attorney’s fees is denied.WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-23
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
ANNA MORSAW
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Reply to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
ANNA MORSAW
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-23
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
ANNA MORSAW
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Grant EOT to Reply to Response ~ ORDERED that petitioner's March 12, 2020 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for filing a reply to the response is extended to and including March 23, 2020.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-12
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion Extension of Time To Reply To Response
|
| Description |
Motion Extension of TimeTo Reply To Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
ANNA MORSAW
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
DENNIS WRIGHT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response ~ ***STRICKEN 3/3/2020***
|
| On Behalf Of |
DENNIS WRIGHT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
DENNIS WRIGHT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-12
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| On Behalf Of |
ANNA MORSAW
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-12
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO RELINQUISH
|
| On Behalf Of |
ANNA MORSAW
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause re Petition
|
| Description |
ORD-Writs Show Cause with Reply ~ ORDERED that respondent shall file a response within twenty (20) days and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply within ten (10) days of service of the response.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-22
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus / Acknowledgment letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-21
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus ~ *FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY*
|
| On Behalf Of |
ANNA MORSAW
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition ~ *FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the respondent's appendix to the response is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not completely text searchable. An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
ORD-Deny Relinquishment of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that petitioner’s February 12, 2020 “motion to relinquish jurisdiction and stay proceedings pending disposition of motion for reconsideration” is denied as moot. A petition for writ of mandamus does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction. See Byrd-Green v. State, 40 So. 3d 848, 848-49 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (“A petition for writ of mandamus . . . [is] independent of and collateral to the proceedings below.”). The parties may seek an extension of time to file a response and/or reply and may advise this court if the matter becomes moot.
|
|
