Search icon

J & J DOOR MANUFACTURING INC. - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: J & J DOOR MANUFACTURING INC.
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit

J & J DOOR MANUFACTURING INC. is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act.

Status: Active

The business entity is active. This status indicates that the business is currently operating and compliant with state regulations, suggesting a lower risk profile for lenders and potentially better creditworthiness.

Date Filed: 31 Dec 1996 (28 years ago)
Last Event: REINSTATEMENT
Event Date Filed: 24 Oct 2011 (14 years ago)
Document Number: P97000001139
FEI/EIN Number 593418741

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32404, US
Mail Address: 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL, 34204, US
ZIP code: 32404
County: Bay
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
GAY JAYSON D President 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32404
WEEKS JERRY L Vice President 2207 NORTH HARBOUR DRIVE, LYNN HAVEN, FL, 32444
GAY JAYSON D Agent 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32404

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED 2020-06-29 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL 32404 -
REINSTATEMENT 2011-10-24 - -
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 2011-10-24 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL 32404 -
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS 2011-10-24 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL 32404 -
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2011-09-23 - -

Debts

Document Number Status Case Number Name of Court Date of Entry Expiration Date Amount Due Plaintiff
J15000058731 TERMINATED 1000000648332 BAY 2014-12-09 2035-01-08 $ 26,321.46 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, PANAMA CITY SERVICE CENTER, 210 N TYNDALL PKWY, PANAMA CITY FL324046432

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2024-03-13
ANNUAL REPORT 2023-03-07
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-09-22
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-02-09
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-06-29
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-04-23
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-04-09
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-02-06
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-02-24
ANNUAL REPORT 2015-03-23

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
341625846 0419700 2016-07-18 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32405
Inspection Type FollowUp
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2016-07-19
Case Closed 2016-09-15

Related Activity

Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1122198
Health Yes
341221984 0419700 2016-02-03 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32405
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2016-02-04
Emphasis L: HINOISE
Case Closed 2018-09-12

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 1059197
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100095 C01
Issuance Date 2016-03-21
Abatement Due Date 2016-05-05
Current Penalty 1680.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2016-04-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Related Event Code (REC) Referral
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a. A Day 2 Panel Processor was exposed to a noise dose of 102.8%, or an equivalent dBA of 90.1 dBA, which was capable of causing permanent hearing loss. The sampling was performed for 474 minutes during one shift on February 3, 2016. The employer did not have a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.
Citation ID 01002A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101000 A
Issuance Date 2016-03-21
Abatement Due Date 2016-05-05
Current Penalty 1680.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2016-04-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1000(a): The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to any substance at a level in excess of the exposure limit given for that substance in Table Z-1 of this standard. a. An employee who sanded wood products in the QC Area was exposed to Total Dust at a Time Weighted Average (TWA) of 28.6 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3), 1.90 times the limit of 15.0 mg/m3. The sampling was performed for 465 minutes during one shift on February 4, 2016.
Citation ID 01002B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101000 E
Issuance Date 2016-03-21
Abatement Due Date 2016-05-05
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): a. On or about February 4, 2016, an employee who sanded wood products in the QC Area was exposed to Total Dust in excess of the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL), the employer did not determine the feasibility of administrative or engineering controls to reduce exposure levels below the PEL.
Citation ID 01002C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 C01
Issuance Date 2016-03-21
Abatement Due Date 2016-05-05
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a. On or about February 4, 2016, an employee who sanded wood products in the QC Area was exposed to Total Dust in excess of the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluation, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator.
Citation ID 01002D
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 D01 III
Issuance Date 2016-03-21
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a. On or about February 4, 2016, QC Area, the employer did not perform exposure monitoring while employees sanded wood product in the QC Area exposing employees to total dust.
341112944 0419700 2015-12-08 2325 TRANSMITTER ROAD, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32405
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2015-12-10
Emphasis P: AMPUTATE, N: AMPUTATE
Case Closed 2019-01-03

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 5A0001
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 1200.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards: a. On or about December 9, 2015, employees operating a World forklift and Thompson forklift were exposed to crushing hazards because the employer did not ensure that employees fastened the seatbelt while operating the lifts.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100022 A01
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 1680.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 19
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition: a. On or about December 9, 2015, throughout the facility, employees are being exposed to fire and/or explosion hazards because the floors, around machines and walls were not kept clean of excessive wood dust accumulation.
Citation ID 01003A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100147 C01
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 1680.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a. On or about December 8, 2015, the employer's lockout program did not consist of written specific instructions on how to lockout varied equipment, employee training and periodic inspections.
Citation ID 01003B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100147 C04 II B
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy: a. On or about December 8, 2015, the employer did not have written specific steps that outlined the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines such as but not limited to the wide belt sander, air compressor, CNC router and dust collection system.
Citation ID 01003C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100147 C05 II D
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s): a. On or about December 8, 2015, red Master locks used for lockout devices were not identified as to whom applied the lock.
Citation ID 01003D
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100147 C06 II
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed: a. On or about December 8, 2015, the employer did not conduct the periodic inspections of their energy control program.
Citation ID 01003E
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100147 C07 I
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: a. On or about December 8, 2015, the employer did not provide training to authorized and affected employees as to the function of their lockout tagout program.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100242 B
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Abatement Due Date 2016-03-08
Current Penalty 960.0
Initial Penalty 1600.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 12
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning. Compressed air shall not be used for cleaning purposes except where reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and then only with effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment: a. On or about December 9, 2015, the compressed air used for cleaning debris off product and employee's clothes were not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. The compressor was set at 90 p.s.i and the hose did not have a chip guard.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100178 L06
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a. On or about December 9, 2015, the employer did not certify that each forklift operator had received a certification.
Citation ID 02002A
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 E01
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about December 8, 2015, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program that consisted of the new labeling system, safety data sheets and pictograms.
Citation ID 02002B
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 F05 I
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a. On or about December 8, 2015, employees were using individual containers with chemicals such as but not limited to air tool lubricant, Bates booth coating and Type 2 bond glue that were not labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein.
Citation ID 02002C
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 F05 II
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a. On or about December 8, 2015, employees were using individual containers with chemicals such as but not limited to air tool lubricant, Bates booth coating and type 2 bond glue that were not labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings.
Citation ID 02002D
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 H03 IV
Issuance Date 2016-03-02
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2016-04-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a. On or about December 8, 2015, employees used hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to air tool lubricant, Bates booth coating, type 2 bond glue, wood filler, pure grip 712 glue, miter glue and finishing wax while working in the facility. The employer did not provide an explanation of the new labeling system, safety data sheets and pictograms.
340144716 0419700 2014-12-15 2630 SEGREST DRIVE, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32405
Inspection Type Planned
Scope NoInspection
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2014-12-15
Emphasis N: AMPUTATE, P: AMPUTATE
Case Closed 2014-12-15

Date of last update: 03 Apr 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State