Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2017-02-06
|
Emphasis |
N: LEAD, P: LEAD
|
Case Closed |
2017-10-03
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-07-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about February 6th, 2017, at the worksite located at 1900 NE 154th St, North Miami Beach, FL 33162, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees who are required to wear respiratory protection such as but not limited to 3M, Model 7193 with combined organic vapors and N95 dust cartridges, while painting in a spray booth. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 F02 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-07-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter. On or about February 6th, 2017, at the worksite located at 1900 NE 154th St, North Miami Beach, FL 33162, the employer did not fit test employees who used tight-fitting 3M Model 7193 respirators while painting in a spray booth. |
|
Citation ID |
01001C |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 G01 I A |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-07-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: On or about February 6th, 2017, at the worksite located at 1900 NE 154th St, North Miami Beach, FL 33162, the employee had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the face-piece 3M Model 7193 and the face. |
|
Citation ID |
01001D |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 K |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-07-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: On or about February 6th, 2017, at the worksite located at 1900 NE 154th St, North Miami Beach, FL 33162, the employer did not provide respirator information training in the use and care annually, for employees who use a tight-fitting face-piece such as but not limited to 3M Model 7193 with combined organic vapors and N95 dust cartridges. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-07-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Variance |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about February 6th, 2017, at the worksite located at 1900 NE 154th St, North Miami Beach, FL 33162, employees were exposed to skin and eye irritation when working with chemicals such as but not limited to, Auto-base Plus MM (Titanium dioxide), organic solvents, and the employer did not provide effective training to employees on the hazards associated with these chemicals, nor the information in accordance with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19030019 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-08-01 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-09-18 |
Current Penalty |
406.0 |
Initial Penalty |
406.0 |
Final Order |
2017-08-30 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a. On or about 07/07/2017, the employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date on 07/07/2017, that the cited violation had been abated for citation 1 item 1 Group a contained in Inspection #1207980, which was issued on 06/12/2017. b. On or about 07/07/2017, the employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date on 07/07/2017, that the cited violation had been abated for citation 1 item 2 Group b contained in Inspection #1207980, which was issued on 06/12/2017. c. On or about 07/07/2017, the employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date on 07/07/2017, that the cited violation had been abated for citation 1 item 1 Group c contained in Inspection #1207980, which was issued on 06/12/2017. d. On or about 07/07/2017, the employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date on 07/07/2017, that the cited violation had been abated for citation 1 item 1 Group d contained in Inspection #1207980, which was issued on 06/12/2017. e. On or about 07/07/2017, the employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date on 07/07/2017, that the cited violation had been abated for citation 1 item 2 contained in Inspection #1207980, which was issued on 06/12/2017. |
|
|