|
CASABLANCA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH, INC., VS SCHECHER GROUP, INC., etc., et al.,
|
3D2020-1874
|
2020-12-16
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
18-34843
|
Parties
| Name |
CASABLANCA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
CAROLINA SZNAJDERMAN SHEIR, David B. Israel, Eric J. Israel
|
|
| Name |
CASABLANCA RENTAL SERVICES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
BARRY P. GRUHER, Cody German, GREGORY R. ELDER, JEANNIE A. HANRAHAN, JEREMY A. KOSS
|
|
| Name |
Hon. William Thomas
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2021-03-18
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-18
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
| Description |
Disp w/o mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-26
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion to Dismiss Granted (OG32) ~ Appellants’ Joint Response in Opposition to Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction is noted. Appellees’ Reply to Appellants’ Joint Response in Opposition to Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction is noted. Upon consideration, Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted. See Libman v. Fla. Wellness & Rehab. Ctr., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515, 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“It is well-established that ‘[p]iecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims are interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties remain in the suit.’”) (quoting S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974)); Miami-Dade Cty. v. Perez, 988 So. 2d 40, 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-26
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice of Entry of Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Record on Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY ~ APPELLEES, SCHECHER GROUP, INC. AND CASABLANCARENTAL SERVICES, INC.'S, REPLY TO APPELLANTS' JOINTRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLEES' MOTION TODISMISS CONSOLIDATED APPEALS FOR LACK OFJURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLANTS' JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOAPPELLEES' MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATEDAPPEALS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ APPELLEES, SCHECHER GROUP, INC. AND CASABLANCARENTAL SERVICES, INC.'S, MOTION TO DISMISSCONSOLIDATED APPEALS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
Consolidations Granted--all purpose (OG24) ~ Upon consideration of the Unopposed Motion of the appellant, it is ordered that the above-referenced appeals are hereby consolidated for all appellate purposes under case no. 3D20-1855. All filings in the case shall be under case no. 3D20-1855. The parties shall file only one set of briefs under case no. 3D20-1855.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
CASABLANCA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate ~ APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATEWITH CASE NUMBERS 3D20-1855 AND 3D20-1875FOR ALL APPELLATE PURP
|
| On Behalf Of |
CASABLANCA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ 20-1855 & 20-1875
|
| On Behalf Of |
CASABLANCA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case letter with attachments. The $300 filing fee for a notice of appeal is due.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
Order to pay filing fee-civil w/atty (OR14B) ~ This is to notify counsel for Appellant that the filing and prosecution of a notice of appeal in this Court is not acceptable without compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, this appeal will be dismissed unless the required three hundred dollar ($300.00) fee is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before December 26, 2020.
|
|
|
|
PABLOE MAYAUD-MAISONEUVE, et al., VS SCHECHER GROUP, INC., et al.,
|
3D2020-1875
|
2020-12-16
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
18-34843
|
Parties
| Name |
PALOMA EVENING LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
FERNANDO OSTALAZA
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
AJS PROPERTY GROUP LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
CECILIA ZSILAVI
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
PABLOE MAYAUD-MAISONEUVE
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
JEREMY A. KOSS
|
|
| Name |
MARIA ELENA IZAGUIRRE
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SOUTH FLORIDA VACATIONS, LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
VACATION RENTS MIAMI BEACH, LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
CASABLANCA RENTAL SERVICES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
CAROLINA SZNAJDERMAN SHEIR, BARRY P. GRUHER, Cody German, GREGORY R. ELDER, JEANNIE A. HANRAHAN, David B. Israel
|
|
| Name |
Hon. William Thomas
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2021-03-18
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
| Description |
Disp w/o mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-18
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-26
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion to Dismiss Granted (OG32) ~ Appellants’ Joint Response in Opposition to Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction is noted. Appellees’ Reply to Appellants’ Joint Response in Opposition to Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction is noted. Upon consideration, Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted. See Libman v. Fla. Wellness & Rehab. Ctr., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515, 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“It is well-established that ‘[p]iecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims are interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties remain in the suit.’”) (quoting S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974)); Miami-Dade Cty. v. Perez, 988 So. 2d 40, 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-26
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice of Entry of Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Record on Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY ~ APPELLEES, SCHECHER GROUP, INC. AND CASABLANCARENTAL SERVICES, INC.'S, REPLY TO APPELLANTS' JOINTRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLEES' MOTION TODISMISS CONSOLIDATED APPEALS FOR LACK OFJURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLANTS' JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOAPPELLEES' MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATEDAPPEALS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ APPELLEES, SCHECHER GROUP, INC. AND CASABLANCARENTAL SERVICES, INC.'S, MOTION TO DISMISSCONSOLIDATED APPEALS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
Consolidations Granted--all purpose (OG24) ~ Upon consideration of the Unopposed Motion of the appellant, it is ordered that the above-referenced appeals are hereby consolidated for all appellate purposes under case no. 3D20-1855. All filings in the case shall be under case no. 3D20-1855. The parties shall file only one set of briefs under case no. 3D20-1855.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate ~ APPELLANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATEWITH CASE NUMBERS 3D20-1855 AND 3D20-1874FOR ALL APPELLATE PURPOSES
|
| On Behalf Of |
PABLOE MAYAUD-MAISONEUVE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ RELATED CASES: 20-1855 & 20-1874
|
| On Behalf Of |
PABLOE MAYAUD-MAISONEUVE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
PABLOE MAYAUD-MAISONEUVE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
Order to pay filing fee-civil w/atty (OR14B) ~ This is to notify counsel for Appellants that the filing and prosecution of a notice of appeal in this Court is not acceptable without compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, this appeal will be dismissed unless the required three hundred dollar ($300.00) fee is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before December 26, 2020..
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case letter with attachments. The $300 filing fee for a notice of appeal is due.
|
|
|
|
ALEX STEUBAN, VS SCHECHER GROUP, INC., etc., et al.,
|
3D2020-1855
|
2020-12-14
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
18-34843
|
Parties
| Name |
ALEX STEUBAN
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
ANDREW G. SIMON, GERALDINE P. PENA, Therese A. Savona, Cody German
|
|
| Name |
CASABLANCA RENTAL SERVICES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
OMAR K. BRADFORD, David B. Israel, JEREMY A. KOSS, Eric J. Israel, JEANNIE A. HANRAHAN, JOYCE A. DELGADO, GREGORY R. ELDER, BARRY P. GRUHER, CAROLINA SZNAJDERMAN SHEIR
|
|
| Name |
Hon. William Thomas
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2021-03-18
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-18
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
| Description |
Disp w/o mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-26
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion to Dismiss Granted (OG32) ~ Appellants’ Joint Response in Opposition to Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction is noted. Appellees’ Reply to Appellants’ Joint Response in Opposition to Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction is noted. Upon consideration, Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted. See Libman v. Fla. Wellness & Rehab. Ctr., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515, 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“It is well-established that ‘[p]iecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims are interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties remain in the suit.’”) (quoting S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974)); Miami-Dade Cty. v. Perez, 988 So. 2d 40, 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-26
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Record on Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice of Entry of Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal Transmittal Form
|
| Description |
Notice of Transmittal--NOA
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY ~ APPELLEES, SCHECHER GROUP, INC. AND CASABLANCARENTAL SERVICES, INC.'S, REPLY TO APPELLANTS' JOINTRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLEES' MOTION TODISMISS CONSOLIDATED APPEALS FOR LACK OFJURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
ALEX STEUBAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLANTS' JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOAPPELLEES' MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATEDAPPEALS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
ALEX STEUBAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ APPELLEES, SCHECHER GROUP, INC. AND CASABLANCARENTAL SERVICES, INC.'S, MOTION TO DISMISSCONSOLIDATED APPEALS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
Consolidations Granted--all purpose (OG24) ~ Upon consideration of the Unopposed Motion of the appellant, it is ordered that the above-referenced appeals are hereby consolidated for all appellate purposes under case no. 3D20-1855. All filings in the case shall be under case no. 3D20-1855. The parties shall file only one set of briefs under case no. 3D20-1855.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate ~ APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATEWITH CASE NUMBERS 3D20-1874 AND 3D20-1875FOR ALL APPELLATE PURPOSES
|
| On Behalf Of |
ALEX STEUBAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-14
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
ALEX STEUBAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-14
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ RLATED CASES: 20-1874, 20-1875
|
| On Behalf Of |
ALEX STEUBAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-14
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case with attachments. **The $300 filing fee for an appeal is due.
|
|
|
|
LAURA MAFALE, et al., VS SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
3D2018-1163
|
2018-06-11
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
17-29067
|
Parties
| Name |
LAURA MAFALE
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
ARTHUR J. MORBURGER, INGER M. GARCIA
|
|
| Name |
GERARD MAFALE
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
BEVERLY D. EISENSTADT, GREGORY R. ELDER, Steven M. Davis
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Beatrice Butchko
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2018-09-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-09-07
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
| Description |
Disp w/o mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-08-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Rehearing denied (OD57)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-24
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
LAURA MAFALE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-09
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion to Dismiss Granted (OG32) ~ ORDERED that appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is hereby dismissed. See Beggi v. Ocean Bank, 91 So. 3d 193, 195-96 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (dismissing because “[a]t the time the notices of appeal were filed, and also at the time Ocean Bank filed its motions to dismiss, Beggi had no interest in the two condominium units”).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-09
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ to motion to dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar or Related Case
|
| On Behalf Of |
LAURA MAFALE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-25
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ AMENDED RESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL AND ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STRIKE
|
| On Behalf Of |
LAURA MAFALE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
LAURA MAFALE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY ~ to motion to dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
LAURA MAFALE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
Order to pay filing fee-civil w/atty (OR14B) ~ This is to notify counsel for appellants that the filing and prosecution of a notice of appeal in this Court is not acceptable without compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The required three hundred ($300.00) dollar filing fee is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before June 30, 2018.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ Motion to direct the lower court to supplement the record and for eot to file response to motion to dismiss appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
LAURA MAFALE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-13
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-13
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal Transmittal Form
|
| Description |
Notice of Transmittal--NOA
|
| On Behalf Of |
LAURA MAFALE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case with attachments. ** The $300 filing fee for an appeal is due.
|
|
|
|
HUGO PEDRIEL, et al., VS SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
3D2018-1165
|
2018-06-11
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
17-5292
|
Parties
| Name |
HUGO PEDRIEL
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
ARTHUR J. MORBURGER, INGER M. GARCIA
|
|
| Name |
CAROLINE HOGNER
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
BEVERLY D. EISENSTADT, GREGORY R. ELDER, Steven M. Davis
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Beatrice Butchko
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-13
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-25
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ AMENDED RESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL AND ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STRIKE
|
| On Behalf Of |
HUGO PEDRIEL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-09-07
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
| Description |
Disp w/o mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-09-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-08-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Rehearing denied (OD57)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-24
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
HUGO PEDRIEL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-09
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-09
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion to Dismiss Granted (OG32) ~ ORDERED that appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is hereby dismissed. See Beggi v. Ocean Bank, 91 So. 3d 193, 195-96 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (dismissing because “[a]t the time the notices of appeal were filed, and also at the time Ocean Bank filed its motions to dismiss, Beggi had no interest in the two condominium units”).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ to motion to dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
SCHECHER GROUP, INC.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar or Related Case
|
| On Behalf Of |
HUGO PEDRIEL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY ~ to motion to dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
HUGO PEDRIEL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
HUGO PEDRIEL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
Order to pay filing fee-civil w/atty (OR14B) ~ This is to notify counsel for appellants that the filing and prosecution of a notice of appeal in this Court is not acceptable without compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The required three hundred ($300.00) dollar filing fee is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before June 30, 2018.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ Motion to direct the clerk of the lower court to supplement the record on appeal and for eot to file response to ae motion to dismiss appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
HUGO PEDRIEL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal Transmittal Form
|
| Description |
Notice of Transmittal--NOA
|
| On Behalf Of |
HUGO PEDRIEL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case with attachments. ** The $300 filing fee for an appeal is due.
|
|
|
