Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2013-06-20
|
Emphasis |
L: FORKLIFT, N: AMPUTATE
|
Case Closed |
2018-03-12
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
824282 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100147 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2013-08-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-10-18 |
Current Penalty |
1680.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
Final Order |
2013-10-21 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a. Warehouse print shop - at the press area, an energy control program consisting of energy control, training and inspections was not developed for printing presses such as, but not limited to Harris and Cottrell. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. a. Warehouse print shop - at the bindery room, an energy control program consisting of energy control, training and inspections was not developed for equipment such as, but not limited to Muller stacker, Muller Typ 217 and Muller Typ 222. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100178 L01 I |
Issuance Date |
2013-08-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-10-18 |
Current Penalty |
720.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
Final Order |
2013-10-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a. Warehouse print shop - employee(s) that used Caterpillar A544620 and Mitsubishi AE 2B-01570 industrial trucks were not trained in industrial truck operations. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2013-08-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-11-18 |
Current Penalty |
1680.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
Final Order |
2013-10-21 |
Nr Instances |
6 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. Bindery room - rotating drums/reels at the six pocket feeders were not guarded on the Hans Muller Typ 222 exposing employee(s) to a caught-in hazard, in that, the unguarded drums/reels rotated at the manual feeding areas. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. |
|
Citation ID |
01004A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2013-08-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-10-18 |
Current Penalty |
720.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
Final Order |
2013-10-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
13 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Warehouse print shop - the employer did not have a hazard communication program when employee(s) were exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to, inks, grease, oils, gases and solvents. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. |
|
Citation ID |
01004B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101200 F05 I |
Issuance Date |
2013-08-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-10-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2013-10-21 |
Nr Instances |
3 |
Nr Exposed |
13 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a. Warehouse print shop - south east large ink tank was not labeled. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. b. Warehouse print shop- north ink tote was not labeled. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. c. Warehouse print shop - south ink tote was not labeled. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. |
|
Citation ID |
01004C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2013-08-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-10-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2013-10-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
13 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Warehouse print shop - the employer did not have a hazard communication training when employee(s) were exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to, inks, grease, oils, gases and solvents. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100038 B |
Issuance Date |
2013-08-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-10-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2013-10-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
25 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review: a. Warehouse print shop - where flammable materials were stored, the employer did not have an emergency action plan. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. |
|
Citation ID |
02002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100132 D01 |
Issuance Date |
2013-08-30 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-10-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2013-10-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a. Warehouse print shop - the employer did not have a written certification of a workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment for job tasks. Violation observed on or about 6/20/13. |
|
|