| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-02-02
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2016-09-06
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2016-03-09 |
| Current Penalty |
2520.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4200.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about February 2, 2016, on the north west side of a new residential construction, an employee working beneath an employee applying stucco from a five buck scaffold was not wearing a hard hat, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck by falling debris. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B03 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-03-09 |
| Current Penalty |
2940.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): Where guardrails were not installed along the front edge of the platform or all employees were not protected from falling with the use of personal fall arrest systems, the front edge of the scaffold platform during plastering and lathing operations: a. On or about February 2, 2016 on the south west side of a new construction residential house, an employee applying stucco material to the facing of the house was not protected from a 20 feet 6 inch fall hazard by the use of a personal fall arrest system. b. On or about February 2, 2016 on the north west side of a new construction residential house, an employee applying stucco material to the facing of the house was not protected from a 13 feet 7 inch fall hazard by the use of a personal fall arrest system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B02 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-03-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide: a. On or about February 2, 2015 on the south west side of a new residential house, an employee applying stucco to the surface of the house was using a scaffold that that had platforms that were not at least 18 inches wide, exposing employees to a 20 feet 6 inch fall hazard. b. On or about February 2, 2016 on the north west side of a new residential house, an employee applying stucco to the surface of the house was using a scaffold that that had platforms that were not at least 18 inches wide, exposing employees to a 13 feet 7 inch fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-03-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Where scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers, stairway-type ladders, ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used for access: a. On or about February 2, 2016 on the west side of a new residential house, three employees working on a five buck frame scaffold did not use a ladder to access the scaffold, exposing the employees to fall hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F03 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-03-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a. On or about February 2, 2016 on the west side of a new residential house, the employer did not ensure employees applying stucco to the face of the house were using a scaffold that was inspected prior to its use for it's structural integrity, exposing employees to fall hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002E |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 V |
| Issuance Date |
2016-03-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v): Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway: a. On or about February 2, 2015 on the south west side of a new residential house, an employee applying stucco to the surface of the house was using a scaffold that that had guardrails installed with a 12 inch opening along the walk board on one side, exposing employees to a fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002F |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 H02 II |
| Issuance Date |
2016-03-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: a. On or about February 2, 2016 on the north west side of a new residential house, employees working on a five buck frame scaffold did not use toeboards on the edges, exposing employees working underneath to struck-by hazards. |
|
|
