|
341284693
|
0418800
|
2016-03-02
|
4160 NW 21 STREET BUILDING B, LAUDERHILL, FL, 33313
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-03-02
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1067214 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1128473 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B04 I |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5390.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes. On or about March 2, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet while exposed to unguarded holes in the roof sheathing while performing roofing repairs, without means of conventional fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D15 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5390.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. On or about March 2, 2016, at the above addressed job site, two employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while both being attached to the same anchorage that was intended for one person, while performing roofing repairs. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D16 III |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: On or about March 2, 2016, at the above addressed job site, two employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while being attached to the same anchorage while using lifelines that allowed a free fall distance of more than 6 feet to the lower level. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D21 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: On or about March 2, 2016, at the above addressed job site, two employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while performing roofing repairs, while being attached to the same anchorage that was intended for one person with slack lifelines, that had not been inspected. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
10780.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems or conventional fall protection systems: On or about March 2, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while installing roofing materials from a roof without means of conventional fall protection. The PAYTON ROOFING, INC. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1093418, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on October 28, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 13296 NW 5th St. Plantation, FL 33325. To abate this hazard Payton Roofing, Inc. must provide fall protection to employees engaged in residential construction and exposed to a fall hazard of six feet or more while conducting residential construction. Date by which violation must be abated: Immediately upon receipt of the Citation and Notification of Penalty. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, Payton Roofing, Inc. must submit documents describing the measures it is taking to ensure compliance with fall protection to eliminate employee exposure to hazardous condition. |
|
|
|
341284735
|
0418800
|
2016-02-29
|
4160 NW 21 ST BUILDING D, LAUDERHILL, FL, 33313
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-02-29
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1067214 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1128469 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D09 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5390.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(9): Lanyards and/or vertical lifelines did not have a minimum breaking strength of 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN): On or about February 29, 2016, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while using a defective undersized lifeline that had knots and abrasions while performing roofing repairs. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D15 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. On or about February 29, 2016, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while using the single metal tube of an air handling unit as an anchorage while performing roofing repairs. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D21 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: On or about February 29, 2016, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while using a defective undersized lifeline that had knots and abrasions while performing roofing repairs. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D19 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(19): Personal fall arrest systems and components subjected to impact loading were not immediately removed from service and/or were reused before they were inspected by a competent person and determined to be suitable for reuse: On or about February 29, 2016, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while using a defective undersized lifeline that had not been removed from service, that had knots and abrasions while performing roofing repairs. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5390.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about February 29, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet, while using an extension ladder that did not extend 3 feet above the upper roof landing and lacked a grasping device. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
10780.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems or conventional fall protection systems: On or about February 29, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet while installing roofing materials from a roof without means of conventional fall protection. The PAYTON ROOFING, INC. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1093418, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on October 28, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 13296 NW 5th St. Plantation, FL 33325. To abate this hazard Payton Roofing, Inc. must provide fall protection to employees engaged in residential construction and exposed to a fall hazard of six feet or more while conducting residential construction. Date by which violation must be abated: Immediately upon receipt of the Citation and Notification of Penalty. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, Payton Roofing, Inc. must submit documents describing the measures it is taking to ensure compliance with fall protection to eliminate employee exposure to hazardous condition. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-23 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
10780.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about February 29, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees who had not been provided training to recognize fall hazards were exposed to a fall hazard of about 18 feet while performing roofing repairs, without means of conventional fall protection. The PAYTON ROOFING, INC. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1093418, citation number 1, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on October 28, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 13296 NW 5th St. Plantation, FL 33325. To abate this hazard Payton Roofing, Inc. must provide fall protection training to employees engaged in residential construction and exposed to a fall hazard of six feet or more while conducting residential construction. Date by which violation must be abated: Immediately upon receipt of the Citation and Notification of Penalty. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, Payton Roofing, Inc. must submit documents describing the measures it is taking to ensure compliance with fall protection to eliminate employee exposure to hazardous condition. |
|
|
|
341194066
|
0418800
|
2016-01-19
|
13550 SW 10TH STREET, PEMBROKE PINES, FL, 33026
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-01-19
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2021-09-28
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 III |
| Issuance Date |
2016-07-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-08 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Contest Date |
2016-07-01 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
9 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iii): The safety monitor was not on the same walking/working surface and within visual sighting distance of the employee being monitored. a) On or about January 19, 2016 at the above addressed jobsite, employees working on a low sloped roof were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9' 7" due to the lack of fall protection system and the employees not within visual distance sighting of the Safety Monitor. Employees were observed working on the roof at the front and the rear side of the building with the safety monitor at the ground level without a clear view of all the employees. |
|
|
|
340934181
|
0418800
|
2015-09-21
|
13296 NW 5TH ST., PLANTATION, FL, 33325
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-09-21
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2023-02-13
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-09-30 |
| Current Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-28 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems or conventional fall protection systems: On or about September 21, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 16.5 feet, while installing tar paper and shingles on a roof without a conventional means of fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-10-13 |
| Current Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-28 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about September 21, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees who had not been provided training to recognize fall hazards were exposed to a fall hazard of about 16.5 feet while installing tarpaper and shingles on a low slope roof of a residence and were standing near the edge of the roof without a means of fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19030019 D01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
700.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
700.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-02-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: On or about 01/13/2017, the employer did not send abatement documentation for citation 1 item 2 contained in Inspection #1093418, which was issued on 09/30/2015. |
|
|
