|
340783141
|
0419700
|
2015-07-16
|
500 EAST ADAMS STREET, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32202
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-09-10
|
| Case Closed |
2015-11-06
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1001648 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1078459 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 F05 I |
| Issuance Date |
2015-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-11-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: (Construction Reference: 1926.59): a. On or about July 17, 2015, on an outdoor scaffold, at the Jacksonville Pre-Trial Detention Facility, employees worked with flammable and hazardous chemicals, such as xylene, and the secondary containers used to transport these chemicals did not have labels prominently displayed that identified the hazardous chemical contained. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 F05 II |
| Issuance Date |
2015-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-11-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: (Construction Reference: 1926.59): a. On or about July 17, 2015, on an outdoor scaffold, at the Jacksonville Pre-Trial Detention Facility, employees worked with flammable and hazardous chemicals, such as xylene, and the secondary containers used to transport these chemicals did not have any form of hazard warnings prominently displayed. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-11-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area, (Construction Reference: 1926.59): a. On or about July 17, 2015, on an outdoor scaffold, at the Jacksonville Pre-Trial Detention Facility, employees worked with flammable and hazardous chemicals, such as xylene and silicone based sealants, while waterproofing the exterior face of the building and were not provided training on these chemicals, exposing the employees to respiratory illness and burns. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001D |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H03 IV |
| Issuance Date |
2015-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-11-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a. On or about July 17, 2015, on an outdoor scaffold, at the Jacksonville Pre-Trial Detention Facility, employees worked with flammable and hazardous chemicals, such as xylene and silicone based sealants, while waterproofing the exterior face of the building and the employer did not explained the new labeling system and safety data sheet requirements under the new hazard communication program (GHS 2012). |
|
|
|
336106380
|
0419700
|
2012-09-04
|
2750 JOHN PROM BLVD, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32254
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-09-04
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: EISAX, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2012-10-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D17 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-14 |
| Current Penalty |
720.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-09-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: a. On or about September 4, 2012, the employee had his lanyard attached to his belt, exposing himself to injuries if he was to fall from the lift. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 III |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-14 |
| Current Penalty |
1680.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-09-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iii): The safety monitor was not on the same walking/working surface and within visual sighting distance of the employee being monitored. a. On September 4, 2012, on a flat roof, the safety monitor was not on the same walking/working surface and within visual sighting distance of the employee being monitored, exposing the employee to a 30-foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 V |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-14 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-09-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(v): The safety monitor had other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function: a. On or about September 4, 2012, on a flat roof, the safety monitor was operating an aerial lift and installing flashing on the side of the roof which distracted his attention from the monitoring function, exposing the employee to a 30-fall hazard. |
|
|
|
310033238
|
0419700
|
2007-08-30
|
8000 POINT MEADOWS DR, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32256
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2007-08-30
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, S: FALL FROM HEIGHT, S: POWERED IND VEHICLE
|
| Case Closed |
2007-12-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260453 B02 V |
| Issuance Date |
2007-10-31 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2007-11-05 |
| Current Penalty |
612.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
875.0 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
03 |
|
|
