VANESSA CASTILLO CORP - Florida Company Profile
Share on:
| Entity Name: | VANESSA CASTILLO CORP |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: |
Domestic Profit
VANESSA CASTILLO CORP is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act. |
| Status: |
Active
The business entity is active. This status indicates that the business is currently operating and compliant with state regulations, suggesting a lower risk profile for lenders and potentially better creditworthiness. |
| Date Filed: | 18 Oct 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Document Number: | P23000074167 |
| FEI/EIN Number |
NOT APPLICABLE
Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS. |
| Address: | 5533 N MILITARY TRAIL, 1707, BOCA RATON, FL, 33496 |
| Mail Address: | 5533 N MILITARY TRAIL, 1707, BOCA RATON, FL, 33496 |
| ZIP code: | 33496 |
| County: | Palm Beach |
| Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| CASTILLO VANESSA A | President | 5533 N MILITARY TRAIL SUITE 1707, BOCA RATON, FL, 33496 |
| CASTILLO VANESSA A | Agent | 5533 N MILITARY TRAIL, BOCA RATON, FL, 33496 |
| Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RESNICK & LOUIS, PC, ET AL. VS VANESSA CASTILLO, ET AL. | 4D2023-1380 | 2023-06-06 | Closed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Clair Armagnac-Rodriguez |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Resnick & Louis, PC |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Robert J. Squire |
| Name | Urban Air Wellington, LLC |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Urban Air Trampoline Adventure Park |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Name | VANESSA CASTILLO CORP |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Aaron P. Davis, Stephen Nicholas Harber |
| Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2023-08-04 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Denied |
| Description | Denied - Order by Judge |
| Docket Date | 2023-07-17 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice ~ ***STRICKEN*** |
| On Behalf Of | Resnick & Louis, PC |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-08 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-08 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Petition |
| Description | Appendix to Petition |
| On Behalf Of | Resnick & Louis, PC |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-08 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that petitioner's appendix to the petition for writ of prohibition is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-06 |
| Type | Petition |
| Subtype | Petition Prohibition |
| Description | Petition Prohibition ~ *FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY |
| On Behalf Of | Resnick & Louis, PC |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-06 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | FP:Fee Paid Through Portal |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-06 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Petition |
| Description | Appendix to Petition ~ **STRICKEN***FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY |
| On Behalf Of | Resnick & Louis, PC |
| Docket Date | 2023-08-04 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Denied |
| Description | Order Denying Petition for Writ - Prohib. ~ ORDERED that the petition for writ of prohibition is denied without prejudice. The trial court has not ruled on Petitioners’ objection and the lack-of-jurisdiction argument. Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850, 854 (Fla. 1992) (“Prohibition may not be used to divest a lower tribunal of jurisdiction to hear and determine the question of its own jurisdiction”). Petitioners may appeal from a final judgment against them if necessary.CIKLIN, DAMOORGIAN, CONNER, JJ., concur. |
| Docket Date | 2023-07-19 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that petitioner's July 17, 2023 notice is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). Further,Petitioner’s notice is also not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service, or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). An amended document in compliance with the Rules shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2024-05-01 |
| Domestic Profit | 2023-10-18 |
This company hasn't received any reviews.
Date of last update: 02 Jun 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State