| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2018-01-17
|
| Emphasis |
N: PMETALS, P: PMETALS, L: FORKLIFT
|
| Case Closed |
2018-03-09
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Current Penalty |
2473.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
4123.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to a rotating saw blade, in that, 24 inches of the non-cutting portion of the DO-ALL vertical band saw was not provided with a guard to enclose the blade, on or about 01/05/2018. b. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to a rotating saw blade, in that, 14 inches of the non-cutting portion of the Hydmech horizontal band saw was not provided with a guard to enclose the blade, on or about 01/05/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 A03 II |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-02-09 |
| Current Penalty |
2910.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4850.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards, in that, the point of operation of a foot pedal operated 90 ton Cincinnati press brake was not provided with a guard, on or about 01/05/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100215 A04 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Current Penalty |
1746.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2910.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: a. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard, in that, the work rest of the Northern Industrial 8 inch pedestal grinder was 1 inch from the grinding wheel, on or about 01/05/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100215 B09 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: a. Prefabrication area, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard, in that, a tongue guard was not provided on the Northern Industrial 8 inch pedestal grinder, on or about 01/05/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100252 B02 III |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Current Penalty |
2328.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3880.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
25 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not required to wear appropriate goggles to protect them from the rays when noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields were not used: a. At the fabrication areas where welding is conducted, employees adjacent to welding or walking by the welding areas were not protected either by wearing protective eyewear or by having shields or screens enclosing the welding stations, on or about 01/05/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100132 D01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-02-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
25 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a. At the manufacturing areas, a personal protective equipment hazard assessment was not conducted to address the following: 1. Selection and use of personal protective equipment that would adequately protect employees. 2. Communicating selection decision to each affected employee. 3. Selecting the personal protective equipment that properly fits each employee. On or about 01/05/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100147 C04 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a. Prefabrication welding manufacturing area, employees were exposed to the hazard of inadvertent energization or release of stored energy during maintenance operations on equipment such as, but not limited to, vertical and horizontal band saws, Geka Hydrocrop 110 ironworker, Cincinnati 90 ton press brake and Hypertherm burn table plasma cutter. Equipment specific lockout/tagout procedures were not developed and implemented to include at a minimum the following: 1. A specific statement of the intended use of the procedure. 2. Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking, and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy. 3. Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them. 4. Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices and other energy control measures. 5. The magnitude of hazardous energy. On or about 01/05/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100157 E02 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
40 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: a. At the facility, portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected monthly as required to assure their ongoing integrity, on or about 01/05/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
02004 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100305 G01 IV A |
| Issuance Date |
2018-01-23 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-02-02 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
25 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: a. Break alarm area, employees were exposed to an electrical hazard, in that, an extension cord was used in place of fixed wiring and was run on the building wall behind wooden panels and was used to provide power to the buzzard alarm, on or about 01/05/2018. b. West wall of the prefabrication area, employees were exposed to an electrical hazard, in that, a red extension cord was used to provide power to a multi-outlet power strip located on a working bench, on or about 01/05/2018. |
|
|
