| Docket Date |
2023-03-06
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Mashawn King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-06
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Mashawn King
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Reversed
|
| Description |
Reversed - Per Curiam Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Denying Extension of Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's May 11, 2023 motion for extension of time to file the reply brief is denied. Appellant shall file the reply brief within five (5) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will foreclose appellant’s right to file a reply brief.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-11
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 5, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-05
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-10
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Moot ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 2, 2023 “motion to consider answer brief waived and proceed to conference upon initial brief” is denied as moot. The answer brief filed on March 6, 2023 is accepted as filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-30
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Mashawn King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellant's appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1. An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ ***STRICKEN***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-28
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ ***STRICKEN***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-08
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 11/8/22
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 10/8/22
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Mashawn King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-11
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 180 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 9/8/22
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-02
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-07
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Family Law ~ ORDERED that appellee’s March 5, 2023 motion for award of appellate fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that appellee should be awarded fees under section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2021), and if so, the amount appropriate for this appellate case. In determining whether to award fees, the trial court should consider financial need and ability and any other factor necessary to do justice and equity between the parties, pursuant to Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997). If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s March 10, 2023 motion for appellate attorney’s fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that appellant should be awarded fees under section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2021), and if so, the amount appropriate for this appellate case. In determining whether to award fees, the trial court should consider financial need and ability and any other factor necessary to do justice and equity between the parties, pursuant to Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997). If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-22
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ruth King
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's December 30, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellant's appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant's November 8, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted in part. Appellant shall serve the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
