| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2023-01-04
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2023-02-24 |
| Current Penalty |
4018.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4018.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-03-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On top of a structure at 400 Matilda Lane, Jacksonville, FL: On or about January 4, 2023, the employer exposed to struck-by hazards, in that employees were not wearing protective helmets while conducting framing operations. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-02-24 |
| Current Penalty |
4018.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4018.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-03-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was using eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: a. On top of a structure at 400 Matilda Lane, Jacksonville, FL: On or about January 4, 2023, the employer exposed to struck-by hazards, in that an employee was not wearing safety glasses while using NR83A2 Hitachi pneumatic nail gun. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-02-24 |
| Current Penalty |
4688.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4688.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-03-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On top of a structure at 400 Matilda Lane, Jacksonville, FL: On or about January 4, 2023, the employer exposed an employee to a fall hazard, in that the employer did not protect the employee from a 20-foot exterior fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system or personal fall arrest system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-02-24 |
| Current Penalty |
4018.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4018.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-03-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On top of a structure at 400 Matilda Lane, Jacksonville, FL: On or about January 4, 2023, the employer exposed employees to a fall hazard, in that a Little Giant ladder was positioned in the interior of a structure for employees to access the 2nd level landing of a structure. The ladder did not extend 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to a fall hazard. |
|
|
