Docket Date |
2022-05-25
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that the April 29, 2022 petition is not accompanied by a supporting appendix as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(g). Within ten (10) days of service of this order, petitioners shall file an appendix providing an adequate record to review the issue presented. Failure to file an appendix will result in dismissal of this proceeding.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-11
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-11
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-10
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-10
|
Type |
Petition
|
Subtype |
Petition Prohibition
|
Description |
Petition Prohibition ~ *FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY
|
On Behalf Of |
Industrial Nanotech, Inc.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-25
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Order-Original Proceeding Dismissed ~ ORDERED that the May 10, 2022 petition for writ of prohibition is dismissed. Petitioners have an adequate remedy on appeal from a final order if necessary, e.g., Ben-David v. Educ. Res. Inst., Inc., 974 So. 2d 1138, 1139 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), so extraordinary writ relief is not available. Sutton v. State, 975 So. 2d 1073, 1076 (Fla. 2008) (“A writ of prohibition is available only where there is no other ‘appropriate and adequate legal remedy.’”) (citations omitted); Sparkman v. McClure, 498 So. 2d 892, 895 (Fla. 1986) (“[A] defendant cannot resort to a writ of prohibition where he has an adequate remedy via appeal.”).GROSS, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-16
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
Description |
Appendix to Petition
|
On Behalf Of |
Industrial Nanotech, Inc.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-13
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that petitioners' appendix to the petition is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-12
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
Description |
Appendix to Petition ~ ***STRICKEN 5/13/22***
|
On Behalf Of |
Industrial Nanotech, Inc.
|
|