WELLS FARGO INC - Florida Company Profile
Share on:
| Entity Name: | WELLS FARGO INC |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: |
Domestic Profit
WELLS FARGO INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act. |
| Status: |
Inactive
The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders. |
| Date Filed: | 24 Aug 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Date of dissolution: | 24 Sep 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Last Event: | VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION |
| Event Date Filed: | 24 Sep 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Document Number: | P20000066994 |
| Address: | 1500 NW 12TH ST, GAINESVILLE, FL, 32601, US |
| Mail Address: | 1500 NW 12TH ST, GAINESVILLE, FL, 32601, US |
| ZIP code: | 32601 |
| County: | Alachua |
| Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| LEGALCORP SOLUTIONS, LLC | Agent | - |
| SICKELS ANDREW | President | 1500 NW 12TH ST, GAINESVILLE, FL, 32601 |
| THOMAS MARK | Treasurer | 1500 NW 12TH ST, GAINESVILLE, FL, 32601 |
| FITZPATRICK PHILLIP | Secretary | 1500 NW 12TH ST, GAINESVILLE, FL, 32601 |
| WEBB LASHIRISHA | Director | 1500 NW 12TH ST, GAINESVILLE, FL, 32601 |
| Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION | 2020-09-24 | - | - |
| Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob C. Flowers, Appellant(s) v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee(s). | 1D2023-2245 | 2023-09-01 | Closed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Jacob C Flowers |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | WELLS FARGO INC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Nusrat Mansoor |
| Name | Hon. Jose Giraud |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Santa Rosa Clerk |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2023-12-20 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-11-06 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | West Publishing |
| Description | West Publishing |
| Docket Date | 2024-11-06 |
| Type | Mandate |
| Subtype | Mandate |
| Description | Mandate |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-10-18 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
| Description | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-09-16 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Withdrawing Mandate |
| Description | Order Withdrawing Mandate |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-09-16 |
| Type | Mandate |
| Subtype | Mandate |
| Description | Mandate |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-09-14 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
| Description | Motion for Rehearing and clarification |
| On Behalf Of | Jacob C Flowers |
| Docket Date | 2024-08-29 |
| Type | Disposition by Opinion |
| Subtype | Affirmed |
| Description | Affirmed |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-02-05 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Reply Brief |
| Description | Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Jacob C Flowers |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-12-30 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Wells Fargo |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-11-30 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Wells Fargo |
| Docket Date | 2023-11-13 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Initial Brief |
| Description | Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Jacob C Flowers |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-09-18 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Record on Appeal Redacted |
| Description | Record on Appeal Redacted - 168 pages |
| Docket Date | 2023-09-05 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-09-01 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
| Description | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
| On Behalf Of | Santa Rosa Clerk |
| Docket Date | 2023-09-01 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal, orders attached |
| On Behalf Of | Jacob C Flowers |
| Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
| Court | 2nd District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County 2020CA001316XXCICI |
Parties
| Name | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | BRADLEY E. ESSMAN, ESQ. |
| Name | WELLS FARGO INC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | YORDANI CARRO |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | JACOB E. MITRANI, ESQ., MARY J. WALTER, ESQ., Kristine M. Reighard, Esq. |
| Name | HON. LINDA R. ALLAN |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | PINELLAS CLERK |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2021-06-04 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2021-06-03 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice ~ AGREED NOTICE OF EXTENSION TO FILE APPELLEE'S BRIEF//15 - AB (YORDANI CARRO) DUE 6/18/21 |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-04 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Stipulation for Extension of Time ~ 30 - AB (WELLS FARGO) DUE 6/4/21 |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-04 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE'S BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2021-12-13 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice ~ NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-22 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | West Publishing |
| Description | West Publishing |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-22 |
| Type | Mandate |
| Subtype | Mandate |
| Description | Mandate |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-03 |
| Type | Disposition by Opinion |
| Subtype | Affirmed |
| Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
| Docket Date | 2021-06-21 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Appellee Answer Brief ~ APPELLEE WELLS FARGO'S ANSWER BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2021-06-18 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Appellee Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2021-06-07 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR ANSWER BRIEF ~ Appellee Wells Fargo, N.A.'s motion for extension of time is granted, and the answer brief shall be served within fourteen days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-04 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR ANSWER BRIEF ~ Appellee Yordani Carro's motion for extension of time is granted, and the answer brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2021-04-05 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Initial Brief |
| Description | Initial Appellant Brief on Merits |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-03-31 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Record on Appeal |
| Description | Received Records ~ ALLAN - REDACTED - 371 PAGES |
| Docket Date | 2021-03-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Grant EOT (general)-74c ~ Appellant’s motion for an extension of time is granted. Within seven days of the date of this order, Appellant shall serve the initial brief and file a status report demonstrating that arrangements for the transmission of the record have been made. Failure to timely comply with this order will subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. |
| Docket Date | 2021-03-16 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Motion for Extension of Time for Record & Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-25 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion to Stay |
| Description | Order Denying Stay ~ Appellant’s motion to stay is denied. Within 20 days, appellant shall file the initial brief or this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice. |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Miscellaneous Motion |
| Description | Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ Appellant's motion for referral to mediation is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-17 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Objection |
| Description | OBJECTION ~ AND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REFFERAL TO MEDIATION |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-12 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Certificate |
| Description | Certificate ~ OF THE CLERK |
| On Behalf Of | PINELLAS CLERK |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-04 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's notice of withdrawal of the amended notice of appeal is accepted and the amended notice of appeal filed on February 1, 2021, is deemed withdrawn. |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-03 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice ~ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-02 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
| Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ Motion for Referral to Mediation |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-01 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Filing |
| Description | Notice of Filing ~ ORDER OF DISMISSAL |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2021-01-13 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to Show Cause |
| Description | ORD-TO SHOW CAUSE ~ **DISCHARGED**(see 02/04/21 ord)Appellant shall show cause within twenty days why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Rollins Fruit Co. v. Wilson, 923 So. 2d 516, 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ("An order that merely grants a motion to dismiss is not a final order."); Better Gov't Ass'n of Sarasota County v. State, 802 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Jurisdiction is relinquished to the extent necessary to allow the trial court to enter an appealable, final order. Should appellant provide this court with such an appealable, final order within twenty days, this premature appeal will be mature and will proceed to consideration. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l) (stating that if a notice of appeal is prematurely filed before rendition of a final order, "the lower tribunal retains jurisdiction to render a final order") (effective Jan. 1, 2015). If appellant fails to present an appealable order within that time frame, or persuade this court that the existing order is appealable, this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice. |
| Docket Date | 2020-12-29 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice ~ NOTICE OF FAILURE TO SERVE OR FILE INITIAL BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2020-12-29 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO "EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND REQUEST PERMISSION TO PETITION THE LOWER COURT TO ADDRESS THE NEW EVIDENCE OF EXTRINSIC FRAUD" |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2020-12-15 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Stay |
| Description | Motion To Stay ~ Emergency Motion to Stay Proceedings and Request Permission to Petition the Lower Court to Address New Evidence of Extrinsic Fraud |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-11-25 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion For Clarification |
| Description | Grant Clarification-77 ~ Appellant's motion for clarification is granted to the extent that Appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty days of the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2020-11-09 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion For Clarification |
| Description | Motion For Clarification ~ the BRIEFING SCHEDULE |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-10-12 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ The orders attached to the notice of appeal filed in this case reflect that the lawsuit in the trial court in case 20-1316-CI was brought by The Sheena Trust through its trustee, who was represented by counsel in the trial court. Documents available for viewing in the circuit court's online docket reflect that appellant Neelam Uppal is trustee of that trust. It does not appear that Neelam Uppal appeared as an individual in the lawsuit in the trial court, such that she is not permitted to be the appellant, as an individual, in this appeal. If Neelam Uppal is appearing as trustee of appellant The Sheena Trust in this court, she must be represented by counsel. See, e.g., EHQF Trust v. S & A Capital Partners, Inc., 947 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (concluding that a trustee may not appear pro se on behalf of the trust). Within 20 days of the date of this order, Neelam Uppal shall arrange for counsel to appear on behalf of her as trustee of The Sheena Trust, failing which this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice. |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-18 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-18 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Motion |
| Description | ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-31 |
| Type | Miscellaneous Document |
| Subtype | Lower Tribunal Insolvency |
| Description | LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-04 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Certificate |
| Description | Certificate ~ CERTIFICATE OF THE CLERK |
| On Behalf Of | PINELLAS CLERK |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-23 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | YORDANI CARRO |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-21 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Certificate of Service |
| Description | c of s; mailing addresses |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-21 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Amended Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Amended Notice of Appeal |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-21 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-15 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | NF:Not Required |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-15 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ WITH ORDER |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition |
| Court | 2nd District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County 12-114890-CI |
Parties
| Name | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Name | WELLS FARGO INC |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | ALBERTELLI LAW, Kristine M. Reighard, Esq., MARY J. WALTER, ESQ. |
| Name | YORDANI CARRO |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Name | PINELLAS CLERK |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2020-09-11 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Reply |
| Description | REPLY ~ PETITIONOR'S REPLY TO WELLS FARGO'S WRIT OF PROHIBITION |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-11 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Response |
| Description | APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-28 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Motion |
| Description | ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-28 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order |
| Description | Motion For Reconsideration ~ MOTION FOR RE-CPNSIDERATION ON THE ENTITILEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND GARNISHMENT OF EXEMPT ACCOUNTS |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-18 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Denied |
| Description | denial of prohibition ~ Petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-18 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Denied |
| Description | Denied - Order by Judge ~ SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SMITH |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-18 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Case Closed |
| Description | Case Closed |
| Docket Date | 2020-10-13 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
| Description | denial of writ rehearing ~ The petitioner's motion for reconsideration is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2020-10-07 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Motion |
| Description | ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT |
| Docket Date | 2020-10-06 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order |
| Description | Motion For Reconsideration ~ MOTION FOR RE-CONSIDERATION |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-30 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | MISCELLANEOUS ORDER ~ The petitioner's motion for reconsideration, captioned with case number 2D19-2384 but filed under case number 2D20-1932, is hereby docketed in case 2D19-2384. |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-12 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | generic eot grant ~ The petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted in part. The petitioner may serve a reply within 30 days of the date of this order, failing which the petition will be resolved without a reply. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-10 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion Extension of Time To Reply To Response |
| Description | Motion Extension of TimeTo Reply To Response |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-31 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Miscellaneous Motion |
| Description | Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ Appellant's "notice to withdraw writ of prohibition," treated as a notice of voluntarydismissal, is denied without prejudice to file an unconditional notice of voluntarydismissal. Such a renewed notice must not include the phrase "without prejudice." SeeHammerl v. State, 779 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-30 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ IN OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-30 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Response |
| Description | APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-29 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal |
| Description | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ NOTICE TO WITHDRAW WRIT OF PROHIBITION |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-29 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | MISCELLANEOUS ORDER ~ The style of this case has been amended to reflect Yordani Carro as arespondent. Cf. Arsali v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Tr. Co., 82 So. 3d 833, 835 (Fla. 4th DCA2011); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(g)(4). The other parties shall include thisrespondent in the certificate of service of all filings in this case.This court's July 20, 2020, order is amended to reflect that both respondentsshall respond to the petition for writ of prohibition.The petitioner's motion for review of order denying stay is granted only to theextent that this court has reviewed the trial court's order. That order is approved. |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-27 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Objection |
| Description | OBJECTION ~ TO NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY YORDANI CARRO AS RESPONDENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-27 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Certificate |
| Description | Certificate ~ CORRECTED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-24 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF STAY |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-23 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | MISCELLANEOUS ORDER ~ The petitioner's "objection to notation on order/clarification of order" is noted. However, the court's response orders of July 20, 2020, shall remain in effect as written. The court will review the stay issue on or after July 24, 2020, when the respondent's response to the petitioner's motion to stay is due. |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-21 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-21 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Objection |
| Description | OBJECTION ~ OBJECTION TO NOTATION ON ORDER/CLARIFICATION OF ORDER |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-21 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Trial Court Document |
| Description | Miscellaneous Trial Court Order ~ ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTY/WINNING BIDDER'S EMERGENCY MOTIONFOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-20 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Stay |
| Description | Emergency Motion To Stay ~ MOTION FOR REVIEW OF STAY |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-20 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to Respond to Petition |
| Description | prohibition response ~ ***Order Amended by 07/28/20 order***Respondent shall serve a response to the petition for writ of prohibition by July 30, 2020. The petitioner may reply within 10 days of service of the response. This order does not operate as a stay of the circuit court proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(h). |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-20 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Motion |
| Description | ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-07 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Certificate |
| Description | Certificate ~ CORRECTED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-06 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to Supplement Petition |
| Description | Prohibition and mandamus - serve trial judge/LT ~ Within 7 days of the date of this order, the petitioner shall supplement the petitionfor writ of prohibition with a supplemental certificate of service demonstrating service ofthe petition on the trial judge. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(e)(2). The failure of thepetitioner to timely demonstrate such service will subject the petition to dismissalwithout further notice. |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-06 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Certificate of Service |
| Description | Certificate of Service ~ corrected |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-30 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ Petitioner's amended certificate of service states that a copy has been furnished to Respondent via an email address and does not satisfy this court's June 29, 2020, order because Petitioner has not provided the name of the person served on behalf of Respondent. Petitioner is required to respond as directed in the June 29, 2020, order. |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-29 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ The certificate of service in Petitioner's "Response to Order" does not satisfy this court's June 22, 2020, order. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d)(1) requires that the certificate of service state the name of the person served as well as the address used for service. Petitioner's failure to identify the person served has prevented this court from serving Respondent with the acknowledgement letter and orders in this case. Within five days from the date of this order, Petitioner shall file a notice identifying who has been served with the petition. The notice shall include the name, mailing address, and address used for service. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in dismissal of this proceeding without further notice. |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-29 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Certificate |
| Description | Certificate ~ AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-26 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ TO ORDER WRIT OF PROHIBITION |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-22 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Certificate of Service |
| Description | c of s; mailing addresses |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-22 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | WV:Waived |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-22 |
| Type | Petition |
| Subtype | Petition |
| Description | Petition Filed ~ FEE WAIVED SEE 20-964 |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
| Court | 2nd District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County 2012CA014890XXCICI |
Parties
| Name | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | BRADLEY E. ESSMAN, ESQ. |
| Name | WELLS FARGO INC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | MARY J. WALTER, ESQ. |
| Name | HON. LINDA R. ALLAN |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | PINELLAS CLERK |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2021-11-17 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | West Publishing |
| Description | West Publishing |
| Docket Date | 2021-10-08 |
| Type | Mandate |
| Subtype | Mandate |
| Description | Mandate |
| Docket Date | 2021-09-15 |
| Type | Disposition by Opinion |
| Subtype | Affirmed |
| Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-27 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Reply Brief |
| Description | Appellant Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-12 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant’s motion for an extension of time is partially granted, and Appellant may serve the reply brief within fifteen days of the date of this order. However, further motions for an extension of time to serve the reply brief will not be entertained. |
| Docket Date | 2021-04-26 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ 2nd MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME for Thirty (30) daysto File the FINAL REPLY BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-03-25 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | grant eot for reply brief - unlikely ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served within 30 days. However, further motions for extension of time are unlikely to receive favorable consideration. |
| Docket Date | 2021-03-24 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2021-03-10 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-03-09 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-03-04 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Order Denying Extension of Reply Brief ~ Appellant’s motion for extension of time for reply brief and stay is denied. Appellant may serve a reply brief by March 11, 2021. |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-25 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-10 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Appellee Answer Brief ~ NOTICE OF FILING ANSWER BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-10 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR ANSWER BRIEF ~ Appellee's motion for extension of time is granted, and the answer brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2021-02-09 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Appellee Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2021-01-25 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-12-09 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR ANSWER BRIEF ~ Appellee's motion for extension of time is granted, and the answer brief shallbe served within 45 days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2020-11-23 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-10-23 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Initial Brief |
| Description | Appendix for Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-10-22 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Initial Brief |
| Description | Initial Appellant Brief on Merits |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-23 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ The appellant's motion for extension of time is granted only to the extent that the appellant shall serve the initial brief within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extensions will be granted. In the absence of a timely served initial brief, this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice. All other requests in the appellant's motion are denied. |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-11 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BREIF [SIC] AND STAY |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-09-01 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to File Response |
| Description | ORD-TO FILE RESPONSE ~ Appellee is directed to respond within ten (10) days from the date of this order to appellant’s “second motion for extension of time to file initial brief and stay.” |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-31 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ AND STAY |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-13 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Record on Appeal |
| Description | Received Records ~ ALLAN - REDACTED - 843 PAGES |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-05 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ The appellant's motion for extension of time is granted to the extent that the appellant shall serve the initial brief within 45 days of the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-25 |
| Type | Miscellaneous Document |
| Subtype | Lower Tribunal Insolvency |
| Description | LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-04 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY CLERK OF COURT TO COURT'S ORDER DATED JULY 31, 2020 |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-04 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Response |
| Description | APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE |
| Docket Date | 2020-08-04 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-31 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to File Response |
| Description | ORD-TO FILE RESPONSE ~ The clerk of the circuit court shall respond to the appellant's motion to compel within 10 days of the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-29 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-29 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Stay |
| Description | Motion To Stay |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-28 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion To Compel |
| Description | Order Denying Motion to Compel ~ The appellant's motion to compel the clerk is denied without prejudice to the appellant to refile the motion with a certificate of service demonstrating service of the motion on the clerk. |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-27 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Compel |
| Description | Motion To Compel ~ CLERK TO FILE RECORD AND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-02 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ The appellant's motion for extension of time is granted only to the extent that the appellant shall serve the initial brief within 30 days of the date of this order. The motion is denied to the extent that it requests an abeyance of this appeal. |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-01 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Objection |
| Description | OBJECTION ~ TO THE CERTIFICATE OF CLERK |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-07-01 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Certificate |
| Description | Certificate ~ CERTIFICATE OF THE CLERK |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-26 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Reply |
| Description | REPLY ~ REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BREIF AND STAY |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-24 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BREIF [SIC] AND SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD BY CLERK |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-09 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to File Response |
| Description | ORD-TO FILE RESPONSE ~ The appellee shall respond to the appellant's motion for extension of time within 15 days of the date of this order. As the appellant appears essentially to be requesting a stay of this appeal pending resolution of appeal 2D19-676, the appellee shall respond to that request as well.Any request regarding supplemental record is denied without prejudice to the appellant to file a motion to supplement the record in this court. |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-08 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion For Review |
| Description | Order Denying Motion For Review ~ The appellant's motion for review of stay is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-08 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Records |
| Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing |
| Description | Motion Extension of Time For Supp.Record & Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-05 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Motion |
| Description | ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-06-05 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion For Review |
| Description | Motion For Review ~ of stay |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-05-15 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted in part, and the initial brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2020-05-14 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S "SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME" |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-05-08 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-05-04 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion to Stay |
| Description | Order Denying Stay ~ The appellant's emergency motion for stay is denied without prejudice to the appellant to seek stay or other appropriate relief in the trial court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.300(a), (f). |
| Docket Date | 2020-05-04 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Motion |
| Description | ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-05-04 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Stay |
| Description | Motion To Stay |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-25 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | WELLS FARGO |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-23 |
| Type | Miscellaneous Document |
| Subtype | Lower Tribunal Insolvency |
| Description | LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-23 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Amended Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Amended Notice of Appeal |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-17 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
| Description | fee - civil; pro se |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-17 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-16 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | NF:Not Required |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-16 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ WITH ORDER |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-13 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ NOT CERTIFIED |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition |
| Court | 2nd District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County 12-014890-CI |
Parties
| Name | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Name | WELLS FARGO INC |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | KAITLIN HOPE CLARK, ESQ. |
| Name | PINELLAS CLERK |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2020-04-09 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Case Closed |
| Description | Case Closed |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-27 |
| Type | Supreme Court |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal FSC |
| Description | Notice of Appeal to Supreme Court |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-27 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | NOTICE OF APPEAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-24 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | MISCELLANEOUS ORDER ~ The petitioner's motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc is stricken as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(a)(1), 9.330(d)(1). |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-16 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
| Description | Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-16 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Motion |
| Description | ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-26 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-26 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Denied |
| Description | denial of prohibition ~ Petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-26 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Denied |
| Description | Denied - Order by Judge ~ Sleet, Rothstein-Youakim, and Atkinson |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
| Description | fee waiver approved - writ |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-25 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | ORIGINAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-25 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis |
| Description | Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-25 |
| Type | Petition |
| Subtype | Petition |
| Description | Petition Filed |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-25 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Trial Court Document |
| Description | Miscellaneous Trial Court Document |
| On Behalf Of | NEELAM T. UPPAL |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION | 2020-09-24 |
| Domestic Profit | 2020-08-24 |
This company hasn't received any reviews.
Date of last update: 02 Jun 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State