| Entity Name: | STUCCO & RENOVATIONS, INC |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: |
Domestic Profit
STUCCO & RENOVATIONS, INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act. |
| Status: |
Inactive
The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders. |
| Date Filed: | 17 Jun 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Date of dissolution: | 23 Sep 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Last Event: | ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT |
| Event Date Filed: | 23 Sep 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Document Number: | P19000051339 |
| FEI/EIN Number |
842288792
Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS. |
| Address: | 5785 DANUBE WAY, ORLANDO, FL, 32807, US |
| Mail Address: | 5785 DANUBE WAY, ORLANDO, FL, 32807, US |
| ZIP code: | 32807 |
| County: | Orange |
| Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| RAMOS RAMOS SANTA J | President | 5785 DANUBE WAY, ORLANDO, FL, 32807 |
| RAMOS RAMOS SANTA J | Agent | 5785 DANUBE WAY, ORLANDO, FL, 32807 |
| Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2022-09-23 | - | - |
| CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS | 2021-04-18 | 5785 DANUBE WAY, ORLANDO, FL 32807 | - |
| CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS | 2021-04-18 | 5785 DANUBE WAY, ORLANDO, FL 32807 | - |
| REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2021-04-18 | 5785 DANUBE WAY, ORLANDO, FL 32807 | - |
| AMENDMENT | 2019-09-13 | - | - |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2021-04-18 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2020-05-07 |
| Amendment | 2019-09-13 |
| Domestic Profit | 2019-06-17 |
| Inspection Nr | Report ID | Date Opened | Site Address | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 345447700 | 0420600 | 2021-07-19 | LAKELAND BLVD AND VILLAGE LAKES BLVD., LAKELAND, FL, 33805 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Type | Complaint |
| Activity Nr | 1787769 |
| Safety | Yes |
Violation Items
| Citation ID | 01001 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19260453 B02 V |
| Issuance Date | 2021-10-05 |
| Abatement Due Date | 2021-11-01 |
| Current Penalty | 4096.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 4096.0 |
| Final Order | 2021-11-19 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) | Complaint |
| Gravity | 10 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated. a. On or about July 19, 2021, an employee was operating an aerial lift to install siding on the exterior walls of a three story apartment building, during which time a restraint type body belt or a Personal Fall Arrest System was not worn by the operator and/ or the lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard. |
| Citation ID | 01002A |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19260502 D16 III |
| Issuance Date | 2021-10-05 |
| Abatement Due Date | 2021-11-01 |
| Current Penalty | 4096.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 4096.0 |
| Final Order | 2021-11-19 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) | Complaint |
| Gravity | 10 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: a. On or about July 18, 2021, an employee was operating an aerial lift to install siding on the exterior walls of a three story apartment building while wearing a Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS), wherein the system(s) were rigged such that during a fall, the employee would have free fallen more than 6 feet and/ or the system(s) were rigged such that the employee would have contacted the lower level; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard. |
| Citation ID | 01002B |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19260503 A02 III |
| Issuance Date | 2021-10-05 |
| Abatement Due Date | 2021-11-01 |
| Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 0.0 |
| Final Order | 2021-11-19 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) | Complaint |
| Gravity | 10 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used. a. On or about July 18, 2021, an employee was operating an aerial lift to install siding on the exterior walls of a three story apartment building while wearing a Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS), wherein the employer did not ensure that each employee had been trained, by a Competent person qualified in the use and operation of personal fall arrest systems, in subject areas such as PFAS limitations/ minimum fall height, and the nature of fall hazards in the work area, nor did the employer ensure that a Competent and Qualified person evaluated the fall protection knowledge and skills of trainees through written testing and performance assessments; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard. |
Date of last update: 03 Apr 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State
