Search icon

FLORIDA BEST CONSTRUCTION INC - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: FLORIDA BEST CONSTRUCTION INC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit

FLORIDA BEST CONSTRUCTION INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act.

Status: Active

The business entity is active. This status indicates that the business is currently operating and compliant with state regulations, suggesting a lower risk profile for lenders and potentially better creditworthiness.

Date Filed: 13 Nov 2018 (6 years ago)
Last Event: AMENDMENT
Event Date Filed: 24 Aug 2023 (2 years ago)
Document Number: P18000093853
FEI/EIN Number 832563073

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 1913 BROYHILL PL, PENSACOLA, FL, 32526, US
Mail Address: 1913 BROYHILL PL, PENSACOLA, FL, 32526, US
ZIP code: 32526
County: Escambia
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
ARGUETA BRYAN Y President 1913 BROYHILL PL, PENSACOLA, FL, 32526
ARGUETA BRYAN Y Agent 1913 BROYHILL PL, PENSACOLA, FL, 32526

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
AMENDMENT 2023-08-24 - -
REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED 2023-08-24 ARGUETA, BRYAN Y -
REINSTATEMENT 2022-12-20 - -
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2022-09-23 - -
REINSTATEMENT 2019-10-01 - -
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2019-09-27 - -

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2025-02-11
ANNUAL REPORT 2024-01-16
Amendment 2023-08-24
ANNUAL REPORT 2023-04-29
REINSTATEMENT 2022-12-20
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-04-29
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-06-28
REINSTATEMENT 2019-10-01
Domestic Profit 2018-11-13

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
345352223 0418600 2021-06-09 1972 JOSHUA DR., CANTONMENT, FL, 32533
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2021-06-09
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2022-07-18

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260503 A01
Issuance Date 2021-07-15
Abatement Due Date 2021-07-27
Current Penalty 3000.0
Initial Penalty 3511.0
Final Order 2021-09-23
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 7
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) At 1972 Joshua Drive, Cantonment, Florida: On or about June 9, 2021 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without first ensuring his employees were trained on the hazards associated with falls to include but not limited to setting up and inspecting fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 10 feet 9 inches to the ground below.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2021-07-15
Abatement Due Date 2021-07-27
Current Penalty 3000.0
Initial Penalty 7022.0
Final Order 2021-09-23
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 7
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) At 1972 Joshua Drive, Cantonment, Florida: On or about June 9, 2021 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 10 feet 9 inches to the ground below. The Florida Best Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(B)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1416703, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on August 8, 2019 with respect to a workplace located at 103 Saw Grass Way Lot 65, Panama City, Florida.
Citation ID 02002
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2021-07-15
Abatement Due Date 2021-07-27
Current Penalty 3000.0
Initial Penalty 4681.0
Final Order 2021-09-23
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 7
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) At 1972 Joshua Drive, Cantonment, Florida: On or about June 9, 2021 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to use an extension ladder to gain access to the roof and the rails of the ladder did not extend three feet above the roof landing to provide safe access exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 8 feet 2 inches to the ground below. The Florida Best Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.1053(B)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1416703, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on August 8, 2019 with respect to a workplace located at 103 Saw Grass Way Lot 65, Panama City, Florida.
344167036 0419700 2019-07-18 103 SAW GRASS WAY LOT 65, PANAMA CITY, FL, 32405
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2019-07-19
Emphasis P: FALL, L: FALL
Case Closed 2020-08-18

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260102 A01
Issuance Date 2019-08-02
Current Penalty 1363.8
Initial Penalty 2273.0
Final Order 2019-08-08
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or abut July 18, 2019, on the roof, 4 roofing employees operating and working next to pneumatic nailers were exposed to eye injury hazards in that they were not wearing protective eyeglasses.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2019-08-02
Current Penalty 2727.6
Initial Penalty 4546.0
Final Order 2019-08-08
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. On or about July 18, 2019, on the 6:12 pitch roof, 4 roofing employees installing roofing shingles were exposed to a 10.5 feet fall hazard from the eave and a 13 feet fall hazard from the raked edge of the front gable in that they were not protected by a fall protection system.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2019-08-02
Current Penalty 1818.6
Initial Penalty 3031.0
Final Order 2019-08-08
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about July 18, 2019, 4 roofing employees were exposed to a 10.5 feet fall hazard in that the roof access ladder rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the roof eave.

Date of last update: 02 May 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State