| Docket Date |
2023-01-06
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant Voluntary Dismissal (Joint) ~ ORDERED that the stay entered on August 25, 2022, is lifted. It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to the December 21, 2022 stipulated notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed, and the request for oral argument is denied as moot.WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-06
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-21
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
| Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Grant Stay ~ This cause came before the Court on the parties’ August 22, 2022 Joint Motion for Stay of Appeal (the “Motion”). The Court, having considered the Motion, the record, the consent of the parties, and otherwise being fully advised in the premises, it is: ORDERED: 1. The Motion is GRANTED. 2. The action is STAYED until December 19, 2022 unless the Court terminates such stay earlier upon motion of a party. 3. The Court reserves jurisdiction over the parties and this cause to enforce the terms of this Order and, upon proper motion, to modify or terminate the stay imposed pursuant to paragraph 2 above.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ JOINT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
E-S Information Systems Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that Jeffrey S. Berlowitz's August 10, 2022 notice of appearance is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
E-S Information Systems Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Withdraw as Counsel ~ ORDERED that the June 3, 2022 motion of Joseph Miles for the law firm of Siegfried Rivera for leave to withdraw as counsel for E-S Information Systems Inc. is granted. A corporation may not appear unrepresented by counsel in a Florida court. See Telepower Communication, Inc. v. LTI Vehicle Leasing Corp., 658 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, C.A., 476 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Parrot Cove Marina, LLC v. Duncan Seawall Dock & Boatlift, Inc., 978 So. 2d 811, 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that E-S Information Systems Inc. shall be barred from any participation in this case unless within twenty (20) days from the date of this order an attorney licensed to practice law enters an appearance on its behalf. Further, ORDERED that this case is stayed pending the above. Further,ORDERED that said law firm shall provide a copy of this order to E-S Information Systems, Inc. at its last known address.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-03
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
E-S Information Systems Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-28
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-28
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
E-S Information Systems Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-30
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
E-S Information Systems Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee's March 30, 2022 answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Answer Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellee's February 8, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for service of the answer brief is extended to and through March 30, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein will foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellee is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the answer brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
E-S Information Systems Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ **SEE AMENDED MOTION**
|
| On Behalf Of |
E-S Information Systems Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-30
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
E-S Information Systems Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's December 30, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before February 28, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-15
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's November 1, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief and appendix on or before December 17, 2021. In addition, if the initial brief and appendix are not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-01
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-25
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael Wilkinson
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-22
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
