| Entity Name: | QUIJOTE CONSTRUCTION INC |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: |
Domestic Profit
QUIJOTE CONSTRUCTION INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act. |
| Status: |
Inactive
The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders. |
| Date Filed: | 14 Feb 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Date of dissolution: | 27 Sep 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Last Event: | ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT |
| Event Date Filed: | 27 Sep 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Document Number: | P18000015310 |
| Address: | 9551 BENNINGTON CHASE DRIVE, ORLANDO, FL, 32829, US |
| Mail Address: | 9551 BENNINGTON CHASE DRIVE, ORLANDO, FL, 32829, US |
| ZIP code: | 32829 |
| County: | Orange |
| Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| ATAX CORPORATION | Agent | - |
| ROMERO OSEGUERA DARWIN A | President | 425 TALQUIN CT, ORLANDO, FL, 32807 |
| Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2019-09-27 | - | - |
| CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS | 2018-06-25 | 9551 BENNINGTON CHASE DRIVE, ORLANDO, FL 32829 | - |
| CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS | 2018-06-25 | 9551 BENNINGTON CHASE DRIVE, ORLANDO, FL 32829 | - |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| Domestic Profit | 2018-02-14 |
| Inspection Nr | Report ID | Date Opened | Site Address | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 343482410 | 0420600 | 2018-09-12 | 28916 LUCERO, WESLEY CHAPEL, FL, 33543 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citation ID | 01001 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date | 2019-02-21 |
| Current Penalty | 3978.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 3978.0 |
| Final Order | 2019-04-01 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 4 |
| Gravity | 10 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) 2nd floor - employees were exposed to a fall of 11 feet while framing the walls, on or about 9/11/18. |
| Citation ID | 01002 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date | 2019-02-21 |
| Current Penalty | 3978.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 3978.0 |
| Final Order | 2019-04-01 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 4 |
| Gravity | 10 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) 2nd floor - employees were exposed to a fall of 11 feet while using an 8 foot A-frame ladder to access the 2nd floor, on or about 9/11/18. |
| Inspection Type | Prog Related |
| Scope | Partial |
| Safety/Health | Safety |
| Close Conference | 2018-06-07 |
| Emphasis | L: FALL, P: FALL |
| Case Closed | 2020-10-02 |
Violation Items
| Citation ID | 01001 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date | 2018-08-29 |
| Current Penalty | 5174.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 5174.0 |
| Final Order | 2018-10-23 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 8 |
| Gravity | 10 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about 06/07/2018, at 31920 Rothbury Ct. - employees were exposed to 11 feet 8 inch fall hazards while conducting carpentry work, in that, fall protection was not used. |
| Citation ID | 01002 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date | 2018-08-29 |
| Abatement Due Date | 2018-09-11 |
| Current Penalty | 3696.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 3696.0 |
| Final Order | 2018-10-23 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 8 |
| Gravity | 5 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about 06/07/2018, at 31920 Rothbury Ct. - the rails of the ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least 3 foot above the upper landing surface, exposing the employees to a 10 feet fall hazard. |
Date of last update: 01 Apr 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State
