|
344973946
|
0420600
|
2020-07-07
|
2300 LAUREL ROAD, SARASOTA, FL, 34276
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2020-07-07
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-03-01
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1482270 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1613827 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1482325 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D16 IV |
| Issuance Date |
2020-11-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-11-30 |
| Current Penalty |
9446.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
9446.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-02-26 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iv): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, did not bring an employee to a complete stop and/or and did not limit maximum deceleration distance to 3.5 feet (1.07 m): (a) At jobsite located at 2300 Laurel Road E Nokomis, Florida employee(s) performing truss installation work was exposed to 18 foot fall hazard where employer failed to ensure adequate fall protection for employees at a height of 18 feet. |
|
|
|
343906202
|
0420600
|
2019-04-03
|
5015 MINA CIRCLE, FORT MYERS, FL, 33905
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2019-04-03
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-06-14
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1438993 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1390614 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1390606 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-09-19 |
| Current Penalty |
1700.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3334.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-10-25 |
| Nr Instances |
4 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a) For employees working at 5015 Mina Circle, in Fort Myers, as observed on or about April 3, 2019. Employees were using pneumatic nail guns without the use of eye protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-09-19 |
| Current Penalty |
6300.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
11669.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-10-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
13 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) For employees working at 5015 Mina Circle in Fort Myers, as observed on or about April 3, 2019. Employees were framing lumber on the edge of the third floor without a fall protection system. Employees exposed to a fall height of up to 20 feet. Reyes Family Construction Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1346450, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on April 1, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 2300 Tapestry Park Drive Building 1, Land O Lakes, FL, 34639. |
|
|
|
343464509
|
0420600
|
2018-09-14
|
2300 TAPESTRY PARK DRIVE BLDG 1, LAND O LAKES, FL, 34639
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2018-09-14
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-04-02
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1346445 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-02-04 |
| Current Penalty |
2652.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5304.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-04-01 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a. On or about September 14, 2018, employees working above the 4th floor were installing and standing up roof trusses while walking on the wood trusses that were laying down, exposing the employees to a 9 foot fall hazard to the floor below. b. On or about September 14, 2018, employees installing and standing up roof trusses were standing directly at the edge of the building, exposing the employees to a 42 foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D06 I |
| Issuance Date |
2019-02-04 |
| Current Penalty |
2652.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5304.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-04-01 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): Snap hooks were connected directly to webbing, rope or wire rope: a. On or about September 14, 2018, employees working on the roof trusses, above the 4th floor, connected the snap hook on their safety lanyards or rope grabs back to the nylon webbing of the lifeline itself. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D11 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-02-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-04-01 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded: a. On or about September 14, 2018, at the jobsite, the lifelines used by employees above the 4th floor were not protected from abrasion. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D15 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-02-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-04-01 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person: a. On or about September 14, 2018, at the jobsite, the employees lifting, standing up, and installing roof trusses above the 4th floor had their lifelines anchored in place by securing the lifelines to the roof trusses by wrapping the lifeline around the beams of the trusses that were laying down and not braced or secured in place above the 4th floor. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 C |
| Issuance Date |
2019-02-04 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-02-12 |
| Current Penalty |
213.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
426.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-04-01 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section: a. On or about September 14, 2018, at the jobsite, previously trained employees installing roof trusses and using a rope grab system as part their personal fall arrest system did not have safe anchoring location for their lifelines and the lifelines were not protected against abrasion. |
|
|
|
343284923
|
0420600
|
2018-07-06
|
25155 STATE ROAD 54, LUTZ, FL, 33559
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2018-07-06
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2018-09-21
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-09-12 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-10-01 |
| Current Penalty |
3104.4 |
| Initial Penalty |
5174.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-09-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) At the southeast side of building #4, on or about July 6, 2018, three employees installing roof sheathing on a 6:12 pitch residential roof were not protected from a 42 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system. |
|
|
