| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2019-07-12
|
| Emphasis |
N: SVEP, L: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1473812 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Willful |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2020-01-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-02-05 |
| Current Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Contest Date |
2020-01-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. The employer fails to assure effective protections against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 12, 2019, when a male employee with a brown hat, a blue & white long sleeve shirt and light colored pants, is working on the north/front slope with hand tools in the process installing wrap on a residential roof with a 7:12 pitch at 2020 Frogmore Drive, Middleburg, Florida and is exposed to an 9 feet 8-inch fall hazard to the ground in that he is not attached to a personal fall protection system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Willful |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2020-01-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-02-05 |
| Current Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Contest Date |
2020-01-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. The employer fails to assure effective protections against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 12, 2019, when a male employee with a camouflage hat, a white long sleeved shirt and white jeans, is working on the north/front slope with hand tools in the process installing wrap on a residential roof with a 7:12 pitch at 2020 Frogmore Drive, Middleburg, Florida and is exposed to an 9 feet 8-inch fall hazard to the ground in that he is not attached to a personal fall protection system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Willful |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2020-01-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-02-05 |
| Current Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Contest Date |
2020-01-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. The employer fails to assure effective protections against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 12, 2019, when a male employee with a brown hat, a blue long sleeve shirt and blue jeans, is working on the top of the slope with hand tools in the process installing wrap on a residential roof with a 7:12 pitch at 2020 Frogmore Drive, Middleburg, Florida and is exposed to an 9 feet 8-inch fall hazard to the ground in that he is not attached to a personal fall protection system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Willful |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2020-01-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-02-05 |
| Current Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Contest Date |
2020-01-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. The employer fails to assure effective protections against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 12, 2019, when a male employee with a brown hat, a burnt orange long sleeved shirt and blue jeans, is working on the top of the slope with hand tools in the process installing wrap on a residential roof with a 7:12 pitch at 2020 Frogmore Drive, Middleburg, Florida and is exposed to an 9 feet 8-inch fall hazard to the ground in that he is not attached to a personal fall protection system. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2020-01-09
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, N: SVEP
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1473827 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Willful |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2020-01-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-02-05 |
| Current Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Contest Date |
2020-01-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. The employer fails to assure effective protections against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 11, 2019, when a male employee with a black hat, a black long sleeve shirt, and blue jeans, is working on the north slope of the roof using a hammer to secure the plywood on a residential roof with a 6:12 pitch at 2328 Keaton Chase Drive, Fleming Island, Florida, and is exposed to an 8 feet fall hazard to the ground in that he is not attached to a personal fall protection system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Willful |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2020-01-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-02-05 |
| Current Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Contest Date |
2020-01-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. The employer fails to assure effective protections against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 11, 2019, when a male employee with a black hat, blue long sleeve shirt, and tan pants, is working on the south peak of the roof on a residential roof with a 6:12 pitch at 2328 Keaton Chase Drive, Fleming Island, Florida, and is exposed to an 8 feet fall hazard to the ground in that he is not attached to a personal fall protection system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Willful |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2020-01-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-02-05 |
| Current Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
125017.0 |
| Contest Date |
2020-01-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. The employer fails to assure effective protections against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 11, 2019, when a female employee with a brown hat, a striped long sleeve shirt, and blue jeans, is working on the south slope of the roof on a residential roof with a 6:12 pitch at 2328 Keaton Chase Drive, Fleming Island, Florida, and is exposed to an 8 feet fall hazard to the ground in that she is not attached to a personal fall protection system. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2019-02-09
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-06-08
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B05 I |
| Issuance Date |
2019-07-01 |
| Current Penalty |
5626.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5626.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-07-26 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder: a. On or about February 6, 2019, at the left lower eave, two employees spreading tarps accessed the roof with an extension ladder that was set at 62 degrees, an angle 13 degrees shallower than required by the standard, exposing employees to an 8 feet fall hazard from the ladder. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-07-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-07-26 |
| Current Penalty |
131274.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
131274.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-07-26 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. Travis Slaughter d/b/a Florida Roofing Experts fails to assure effective protections against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on February 6, 2019, at a job site at 2187 South Cranbrook Ave, Saint Augustine, Florida, when 6 roofing employees working on the 6:12 pitch slopes of first-story and second-story roofs were exposed to 8-feet to 22-feet fall hazards from the roof eaves and the raked edges of the peaks of roof gables in that they were not protected by a fall protection system. Travis Slaughter d/b/a Florida Roofing Experts, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1318779, Willful citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on December 14, 2018, with respect to a workplace located at 1116 Nochaway Drive, St. Augustine, FL 32092. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1251412, Willful citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on October 23, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 1601 University Blvd. North, Jacksonville, FL 32211. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1207836, Willful citation numbers 1 through item number 5, and was affirmed as a final order on August 24, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 31 Millikan Lane, Saint Augustine, FL 32080. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1190635, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on April 18, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 10 Warner Place, Palm Coast, FL 32164. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1183753, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on April 18, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 1720 A1A South Street, Saint Augustine, FL 32080. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1181361, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on April 18, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 2621 Sunrise Ridge Lane, Jacksonville, FL 32211. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1168041, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on February 15, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 11315 Landing Estates Drive, Jacksonville, FL 32257. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1147180, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on October 11, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 14609 Swansea Court, Jacksonville, FL 32258. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 997948, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on April 15, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 228 Melissa Ray Drive, Jacksonville, FL 32225. Great White Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 996902, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on April 15, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 4324 Queensway Drive, Jacksonville, FL 32257. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-07-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-07-26 |
| Current Penalty |
28131.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
28131.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-07-26 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about February 6, 2019, at the job site, the roof access ladder used by 5 roofing employees at the left eave was extended only 14 inches above the edge of the eave, exposing the employee to an 8 feet fall hazard from the top of the ladder. b. On or about February 6, 2019, at the job site, the roof access ladder used by the Crew Leader was extended only 22 inches above the roof edge above the front entrance, exposing the Crew Leader to an 8 feet fall hazard from the top of the ladder. Travis Slaughter d/b/a/ Great White construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1207836, Repeat Serious citation number 2, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on August 24, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 31 Milliken Lane in Saint Augustine, Florida. Travis Slaughter d/b/a/ Great White construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1207831, Repeat Serious citation number 2, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on August 24, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 30 Milliken Lane in Saint Augustine, Florida. Travis Slaughter d/b/a/ Great White construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1147180, Repeat Serious citation number 1, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on October 11, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 14609 Swansea Court, Jacksonville, Florida. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B04 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-07-01 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-07-26 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed: a. On or about February 6, 2019, the Crew Leader separated the two sections of an aluminum extension ladder and used the fly-section as a roof access ladder that did not have proper base traction. |
|
|
