Search icon

GONZALEZ ROOFING INC - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: GONZALEZ ROOFING INC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit

GONZALEZ ROOFING INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act.

Status: Inactive

The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders.

Date Filed: 07 Mar 2017 (8 years ago)
Date of dissolution: 22 Sep 2023 (2 years ago)
Last Event: ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT
Event Date Filed: 22 Sep 2023 (2 years ago)
Document Number: P17000021974
FEI/EIN Number 61-1823939

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL, 32712, US
Mail Address: 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL, 32712, US
ZIP code: 32712
County: Orange
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
LOPEZ GONZALEZ EVERARDO D President 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL, 32712
LOPEZ GONZALEZ EVERARDO D Agent 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL, 32712

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2023-09-22 - -
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 2022-04-28 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL 32712 -
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS 2022-04-28 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL 32712 -
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED 2022-04-28 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL 32712 -

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-04-28
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-05-01
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-06-23
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-04-25
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-03-29
Domestic Profit 2017-03-07

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
345148233 0420600 2021-02-12 3025 LAKE ELLEN DRIVE, TAMPA, FL, 33606
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2021-02-16
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2021-05-13

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2021-03-11
Current Penalty 4096.0
Initial Penalty 4096.0
Final Order 2021-04-08
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) 3025 Lake Ellen Drive, Tampa, FL Job Site - Three employees were observed installing shingles on a 6 in 12 sloped roof without any type of fall protection, on or about February 12, 2021. The eave to ground height was 11 feet 3 inches.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2021-03-11
Current Penalty 2926.0
Initial Penalty 2926.0
Final Order 2021-04-08
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support: a) 3025 Lake Ellen Drive, Tampa, FL Job Site - The portable extension ladder , used to gain access to the roof, only extended approximately 1.5 feet past the edge of the roof, on or about February 12, 2021.
343267647 0419700 2018-06-29 109 CARDINAL DR, DAYTONA BEACH, FL, 32124
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2018-06-29
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2019-01-17

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2018-08-01
Current Penalty 4434.0
Initial Penalty 4434.0
Final Order 2018-10-11
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Related Event Code (REC) Imminent Danger
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. a. On or about June 29,2018 employees had used an aluminum articulating ladder to gain access to the roof and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, and a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19260503 C03
Issuance Date 2018-08-01
Abatement Due Date 2018-09-18
Current Penalty 415.0
Initial Penalty 415.0
Final Order 2018-10-11
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Related Event Code (REC) Imminent Danger
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill. a. On or about June 29, 2018 Employees were stripping the roof of an existing one story dwelling and were not protected by any means of personal fall Protection, guardrails or safety nets exposing them to falls in excess of 9 feet to the ground below. Employees state they were all trained in the need for and use of fall protection, and were provided with personal fall protection harnesses but claimed the roof was not steep enough to require fall protection, leading CSHO to believe they did not retain or understand the training that was provided.

Date of last update: 02 Apr 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State