Entity Name: | GONZALEZ ROOFING INC |
Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
Filing Type: |
Domestic Profit
GONZALEZ ROOFING INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act. |
Status: |
Inactive
The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders. |
Date Filed: | 07 Mar 2017 (8 years ago) |
Date of dissolution: | 22 Sep 2023 (2 years ago) |
Last Event: | ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT |
Event Date Filed: | 22 Sep 2023 (2 years ago) |
Document Number: | P17000021974 |
FEI/EIN Number |
61-1823939
Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS. |
Address: | 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL, 32712, US |
Mail Address: | 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL, 32712, US |
ZIP code: | 32712 |
County: | Orange |
Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
Name | Role | Address |
---|---|---|
LOPEZ GONZALEZ EVERARDO D | President | 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL, 32712 |
LOPEZ GONZALEZ EVERARDO D | Agent | 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL, 32712 |
Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
---|---|---|---|
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2023-09-22 | - | - |
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS | 2022-04-28 | 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL 32712 | - |
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS | 2022-04-28 | 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL 32712 | - |
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2022-04-28 | 22 JETT LOOP, APOPKA, FL 32712 | - |
Name | Date |
---|---|
ANNUAL REPORT | 2022-04-28 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2021-05-01 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2020-06-23 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2019-04-25 |
ANNUAL REPORT | 2018-03-29 |
Domestic Profit | 2017-03-07 |
Inspection Nr | Report ID | Date Opened | Site Address | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
345148233 | 0420600 | 2021-02-12 | 3025 LAKE ELLEN DRIVE, TAMPA, FL, 33606 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Citation ID | 01001 |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date | 2021-03-11 |
Current Penalty | 4096.0 |
Initial Penalty | 4096.0 |
Final Order | 2021-04-08 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 3 |
Gravity | 10 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) 3025 Lake Ellen Drive, Tampa, FL Job Site - Three employees were observed installing shingles on a 6 in 12 sloped roof without any type of fall protection, on or about February 12, 2021. The eave to ground height was 11 feet 3 inches. |
Citation ID | 01002 |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19261053 B01 |
Issuance Date | 2021-03-11 |
Current Penalty | 2926.0 |
Initial Penalty | 2926.0 |
Final Order | 2021-04-08 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 3 |
Gravity | 5 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support: a) 3025 Lake Ellen Drive, Tampa, FL Job Site - The portable extension ladder , used to gain access to the roof, only extended approximately 1.5 feet past the edge of the roof, on or about February 12, 2021. |
Inspection Type | Planned |
Scope | Complete |
Safety/Health | Safety |
Close Conference | 2018-06-29 |
Emphasis | L: FALL, P: FALL |
Case Closed | 2019-01-17 |
Violation Items
Citation ID | 01001 |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19261053 B01 |
Issuance Date | 2018-08-01 |
Current Penalty | 4434.0 |
Initial Penalty | 4434.0 |
Final Order | 2018-10-11 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 4 |
Related Event Code (REC) | Imminent Danger |
Gravity | 5 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. a. On or about June 29,2018 employees had used an aluminum articulating ladder to gain access to the roof and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, and a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. |
Citation ID | 02001 |
Citaton Type | Other |
Standard Cited | 19260503 C03 |
Issuance Date | 2018-08-01 |
Abatement Due Date | 2018-09-18 |
Current Penalty | 415.0 |
Initial Penalty | 415.0 |
Final Order | 2018-10-11 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 4 |
Related Event Code (REC) | Imminent Danger |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill. a. On or about June 29, 2018 Employees were stripping the roof of an existing one story dwelling and were not protected by any means of personal fall Protection, guardrails or safety nets exposing them to falls in excess of 9 feet to the ground below. Employees state they were all trained in the need for and use of fall protection, and were provided with personal fall protection harnesses but claimed the roof was not steep enough to require fall protection, leading CSHO to believe they did not retain or understand the training that was provided. |
Date of last update: 02 Apr 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State