| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
5A0001 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-02 |
| Current Penalty |
2069.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
5174.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. a) In the shooting room, employees were exposed to struck by hazards from bullet casings and shrapnel when shooting guns into a homemade snail trap that allowed pieces of bullets to eject and strike employees. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100036 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-03-01 |
| Current Penalty |
1182.4 |
| Initial Penalty |
2956.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
6 |
| Nr Exposed |
21 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(2): Exit route doors were operated by a device or alarm that could restrict emergency use of the exit route if the device or alarm fails. a) The exit door by the shooting room, employees were exposed to fire hazards when the exit door was barred in the lock position. This violation was observed on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
2069.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
5174.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) In the shooting room, employees were not enrolled in a Hearing Conservation Program when exposed to continuous noise levels at 89.29% (89.1 dBA) of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 402 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 78 minute period not sampled. This violation was discovered on or about October 10, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100132 D01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-02 |
| Current Penalty |
2069.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
5174.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: a) In the shooting room, the employer did not assess the hazards of the workplace to determine if personal protective equipment was necessary. This violation was observed on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100132 D01 III |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not select PPE that properly fit each affected employee: a) In the shooting room, employees were required to wear latex gloves while shooting, but were only provided with medium sized gloves that would rip and tear because they did not fit. This violation was observed on or about October 10, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
1773.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
4434.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) In the shooting room, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program which covered employees required to wear North 5500-30M half-faced respirators while exposed to lead. This violation was discovered on or about November 20, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) In the shooting room, employees required to wear North 5500-30M half-faced respirators were not provided with a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator. This violation was discovered on or about November 20, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F02 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. a. In the shooting room, employees were required to wear North 5500-30M half-faced respirators without having an appropriate fit test performed. This violation was discovered on or about November 20, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 H02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a) In the assembly area, the employer did not ensure respirators used by employees to protect them from exposure to lead dust were properly stored. This violation was observed on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01006 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100151 C |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Current Penalty |
1769.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
5174.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
14 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) Next to the sandblasting room, employees were exposed to chemical burns and eye injuries when employees used corrosive chemical Manganese Phosphate, but were not provided with a suitable facility for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. b) In the park room, employees were exposed to chemical burns and eye injuries when employees heated corrosive chemical Manganese Phosphate, but were not provided with a suitable facility for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01007A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100303 H02 V B |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
1478.4 |
| Initial Penalty |
3696.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Inspection NR |
1344625 |
| FTA Issuance Date |
2019-01-23 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
14208.0 |
| FTA Final Order Date |
2019-02-05 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.303(h)(2)(v)(B): Suitable guards were not provided for equipment exposed to physical damage from vehicular traffic. a) In the warehouse, employees were exposed to electrical hazards when electrical equipment was not guarded against physical damage from forklifts. This violation was observed on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01008A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101018 K01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-02 |
| Current Penalty |
1769.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
5174.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1018(k)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of inorganic arsenic: a) On the orange hammer in the shooting room, 9.035 um (micrograms) of arsenic was found. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01008B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) On the orange hammer in the shooting room, 31.86 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. b) On the exit door knob inside the shooting room, 30.10 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. c) On the ear muffs in the shooting room, 17.18 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. d) On the gun rack that brings guns to and from the shooting room, 14.82 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01008C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 H02 II |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(2)(ii): Shoveling, sweeping or brushing methods were used to remove lead accumulations where vacuuming or other equally effective methods were available and feasible: a) In the shooting room, employees used a broom to dry sweep an area that had lead accumulations. This violation was discovered on or about October 10, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01008D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101027 K01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1027(k)(1): Surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of cadmium: a) On the orange hammer in the shooting room, 0.290 um (micrograms) of cadmium was found. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01009A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
1769.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
5174.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a) In the shooting room, an employee was exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 74.26 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, approximately 1.4852 times the permissible exposure level of 50.0 ug/m3. Sampling was performed for 276 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 204 minute period not sampled. This violation was discovered on or about October 10, 2017. b) In the shooting room, an employee was exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 67.187 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, approximately 1.3437 times the permissible exposure level of 50.0 ug/m3. Sampling was performed for 401 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 79 minute period not sampled. This violation was discovered on or about October 10, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01009B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a) In the shooting room, the employer did not do an initial determination to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01009C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 E01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year where engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were feasible but did not reduce the employees' exposure to or below the permissible exposure limit the employer did not use engineering and/or work practice controls to reduce esposures to the lowest feasible level: a) In the shooting room, an employees were exposed to lead over the permissible exposure limit on a daily basis the employer did not implement engineering controls to reduce exposure to the lowest feasible level. This violation was discovered on or about October 10, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01009D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 J01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): A medical surveillance program was not instituted for all employee(s) who were, or could be exposed to lead above the action level for more that thirty days per year: a) In the shooting room, the employer did not institute a medical surveillance program for all employees that may be exposed to lead. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01009E |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 II |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
21 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025: a) In the workplace, employees were not provided with training regarding the lead in their work area. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01010A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
2010.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5174.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
21 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. a. In the facility, the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01010B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
21 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. a. In the facility, employees were not provided with training regarding the hazardous chemicals in their work area. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19040040 A |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-03-01 |
| Current Penalty |
295.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
739.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
21 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours. a) At the facility, the employer failed to provide copies of the injury and illness records to an authorized representative. This violation occurred on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-03-22 |
| Current Penalty |
166.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
415.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
21 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a) In the assembly area, employees were permitted to use dust masks on a voluntary basis without being training on the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 II |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-03-22 |
| Current Penalty |
166.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
415.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
21 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a) In the assembly area, North 5500 half-faced respirators were available for voluntary use without the employer establishing and implementing the elements of a written respirator program, medical evaluations or training on storage of the respirator. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
02004 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100157 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
21 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): The employer shall provide portable fire extinguishers and shall mount, locate and identify them so that they are readily accessible to employees without subjecting the employees to possible injury. a) In the assembly area, employees were exposed to fire hazards when a fire extinguisher was not mounted on the wall. This violation was observed on or about September 1, 2017. b) In the hallway outside the shooting room, employees were exposed to fire hazards when a fire extinguisher was not identified with a sign or placard. This violation was observed on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
02005 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100176 A |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Inspection NR |
1344625 |
| FTA Issuance Date |
2019-01-23 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
1500.0 |
| FTA Final Order Date |
2019-02-05 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.176(a): Permanent aisles or passageways were not appropriately marked: a) In the warehouse, employees were exposed to struck by hazards when aisles or passageways were not marked. This violation was observed on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
02006 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100178 L06 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Current Penalty |
166.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
415.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a) In the warehouse, the employer did not certify that forklift operators had been trained. This violation was discovered on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
02007 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100305 G01 IV A |
| Issuance Date |
2018-02-16 |
| Current Penalty |
166.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
415.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: a) In the assembly area, employees were exposed to overload, shocks and burns from a flexible cord, powering a a power strip and a grinder, that was used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure. This violation was observed on or about September 1, 2017. |
|
