Search icon

TOTAL WATER PROOFING SERVICES INC - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: TOTAL WATER PROOFING SERVICES INC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit

TOTAL WATER PROOFING SERVICES INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act.

Status: Inactive

The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders.

Date Filed: 15 Feb 2016 (9 years ago)
Date of dissolution: 22 Sep 2017 (8 years ago)
Last Event: ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT
Event Date Filed: 22 Sep 2017 (8 years ago)
Document Number: P16000014913
Address: 120 JALAPA DR, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34743, US
Mail Address: 120 JALAPA DR, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34743, US
ZIP code: 34743
County: Osceola
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
RAMOS VICTOR R President 120 JALAPA DR, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34743
RAMOS VICTOR R Agent 120 JALAPA DR, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34743

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2017-09-22 - -

Documents

Name Date
Domestic Profit 2016-02-15

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
342190550 0419700 2017-03-20 1155 OCEAN SHORE BLVD. ORMOND BEACH SURSIDE CLUB NORTH, ORMOND BEACH, FL, 32176
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2017-03-20
Emphasis P: FALL, L: FALL
Case Closed 2022-04-18

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B10
Issuance Date 2017-05-02
Current Penalty 3622.0
Initial Penalty 3622.0
Final Order 2017-05-26
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: a. On or about March 20, 2017, car garage, roof area, two employees working outside the warning line, were not protected from falling 10 feet to the ground by a warning line system and safety monitoring system, in that there was no designated safety monitor.
341676237 0420600 2016-08-05 1020 MITCHELL-HAMMOCK RD., OVIEDO, FL, 32765
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2016-08-05
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2020-10-02

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B10
Issuance Date 2016-08-10
Current Penalty 2138.0
Initial Penalty 2138.0
Final Order 2016-09-06
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: a. At the jobsite, on the 9 foot wide flat overhang, fall protection was not provided to employees preparing to install water barrier material, exposing employees to a 10 foot 9 inch fall hazard, on or about 8/5/2016.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B01
Issuance Date 2016-08-10
Current Penalty 2138.0
Initial Penalty 2138.0
Final Order 2016-09-06
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. At the jobsite, near the front entrance, the portable extension ladder used to climb on the overhang extended 12 inches past the landing surface, exposing employees to a 10 foot 9 inch fall hazard, on or about 8/5/2016.

Date of last update: 01 Apr 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State