|
341260990
|
0420600
|
2016-02-18
|
8107 CHILTON DRIVE, ORLANDO, FL, 32836
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-02-18
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2021-02-17
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. Along the top of the exterior cinder block walls, hard hats were not worn when receiving wooden truss frames from a mobile crane, exposing employees to a struck by hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1360.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1360.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. Along the top of the concrete block wall, eye protection was not worn when operating a pneumatic nail gun while installing wood roof trusses, exposing employees to a struck by hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On top of the of the concrete block walls of residential property, fall protection was not provided to employees receiving wood trusses that were being flown by a mobile crane, exposing employees to a 12 foot fall hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. At the jobsite, the extension ladder employees used to access the top of a concrete block wall did not extend past the landing surface, exposing the employees to a 12 foot fall hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
|
|
341261055
|
0420600
|
2016-02-18
|
8430 KARWICK STREET, ORLANDO, FL, 32836
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-02-18
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-11-20
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
5A0001 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to a fall hazard: a. On the 4/12 pitched roof of a residential property, an employee was connected to a vertical lifeline that was tied in knots at the anchorage point exposing the employee to a 9 foot 8 inch fall hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D16 III |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: a. On the 4/12 pitched residential roof an employee's lifeline was rigged in a manner that would not prevent the employee from free falling and impacting the lower level, exposing the employee to a 9 foot 8 inch fall hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-02-29 |
| Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On the 4/12 pitched roof of a residential property, eye protection was not worn when operating a pneumatic nail gun, exposing employees to a struck by hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-02-29 |
| Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On the second floor, the stair case opening was not guarded to prevent employees from falling approximately 10 feet, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261052 C01 II |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-02-29 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a. In the staircase going to the second floor, a handrail or stair rail system was not provided, exposing employees to a 10 foot fall hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On the 4/12 pitched roof of a residential property, fall protection was not provided to an employee installing plywood sheeting and doing framing work, exposing the employee to a 9 foot 8 inch fall hazard, on or about 2/18/16. |
|
|
|
341236404
|
0420600
|
2016-02-08
|
1379 KIAWAH ST AND 1544 RESOLUTE ST, CELEBRATION, FL, 34747
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-02-08
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-12-02
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260453 B02 V |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: a. Under the balcony between the two houses, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard, in that, a 460 JLG aerial lift as used without any type of fall protection, on or about 02/08/2016. Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. At the site, 1379 Kiawah St and 1544 Resolute St, Celebration Florida, employees were exposed to a 30 feet fall hazard during framing operations at two single family homes, three stories high, in that, no fall protection was used during roof sheathing at an 8 to 12 pitch roof and while handling sheets of plywood through the trusses in support of sheathing work, on or about 02/08/2016. b. At the site, 1379 Kiawah St and 1544 Resolute St, Celebration Florida, employees were exposed to a 12 feet fall hazard during framing of the balcony that joins the two homes, in that, no fall protection was used and no guardrails were installed, on or about 02/08/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-04-07 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. At the site, 1379 Kiawah St and 1544 Resolute St, Celebration Florida, employees were exposed to a 30 feet fall hazard during framing operations of two single family homes, three stories high, in that, training and education on fall protection was not provided, on or about 02/08/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261052 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a. At the site, 1379 Kiawah St, Celebration Florida, employees were exposed to a fall hazard, in that, a stairway leading from the ground floor to the second floor was not provided with a handrail system, on or about 02/08/2016. b. At the site, 1544 Resolute St, Celebration Florida, employees were exposed to a fall hazard, in that, a stairway leading from the ground floor to the second floor was not provided with a handrail system, on or about 02/08/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260020 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-04-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): A safety and health program was not initiated and/or maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provisions of the standard: a. The employer did not develop and implement a safety and health program to address the company policy on safety as well as the employer/employee responsibilities, on or about 02/08/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260405 G02 IV |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a. Ground floor, at the east side of 1544 Resolute St, Celebration Florida, employees were exposed to an electrical hazard, in that, a red extension cord providing power to a saw was used with the outer sheath of the insulation pulled from the plug, on or about 02/08/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B02 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-22 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide: a. Under the balcony between the two houses, an employee was exposed to a 6 feet fall hazard, in that, a platform 12 inches wide was used to reach at the working elevation on the side of the balcony during framing work, on or about 02/08/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19030019 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-07-21 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-07-27 |
| Current Penalty |
400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
400.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-09-13 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
9 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a. A certification of abatement was not provided for: Citation 1 item 3 issued under 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) where the employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. At 1379 Kiawah St and 1544 Resolute St, Celebration Florida, employees were exposed to a 30 feet fall hazard during framing operations of two single family homes, three stories high, in that, training and education on fall protection was not provided, on or about 02/08/2016. b. A certification of abatement was not provided for: Citation 2 item 1 issued under 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1) where a safety and health program was not initiated and/or maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provisions of the standard. The employer did not develop and implement a safety and health program to address the company policy on safety as well as the employer/employee responsibilities, on or about 02/08/2016. |
|
|
|
341213031
|
0420600
|
2016-01-29
|
4688-4682 FAIRY TALE CIR, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34746
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-01-29
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: EISAOF, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-10-02
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-03 |
| Current Penalty |
2040.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2040.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On top of the concrete block wall, fall protection was not provided to employees installing wood floor joist and roof trusses on a residential property, exposing the employees to a 9 foot 10 inch fall hazard, on or about 1/29/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-03 |
| Current Penalty |
1360.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1360.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. At the jobsite, the 16 foot extension ladder that was used to access the top of concrete block wall was braced against the concrete block wall and did not extend past the landing surface, exposing employees to a 9 foot 10 inch fall hazard, on or about 1/29/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B08 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-03 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-18 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder: a. At the jobsite, the 16 foot portable extension ladder employees used to gain access to the top of a concrete block wall was not secured from displacement, exposing employees to a 9 foot 10 inch fall hazard, on or about 1/29/16. |
|
|
