| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-02-26
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: EISAX, L: EISAOF, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2016-09-09
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 C02 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-04-07 |
| Current Penalty |
1440.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-03-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: a. Scaffold - during stucco operations on a welded frame scaffold, mud sills were not provided and exposed employees to fall hazards. Violation observed on or about 2/26/15. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-03-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level: a. Scaffold east side - guardrails were missing on the welded frame scaffold during stucco operations and exposed employees up to a 14 foot fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 2/26/15. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Current Penalty |
1440.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-03-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access: a. Scaffold - a ladder for access to the welded frame scaffold was not installed, in that, employees used end frames and railings for access and were exposed up to a 14 foot fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 2/26/15. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-04-28 |
| Current Penalty |
1440.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-03-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a. Scaffold - employees who used a welded frame scaffold during stucco operations had not been trained in the safe use of the scaffold and the hazards associated with the use of the scaffold exposing employees up to a 14 foot fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 2/26/15. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-04-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-03-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a. Mixing area - the employer did not provide the information contained in Appendix D when 3M N95 dust masks were used. Violation observed on or about 2/26/15. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-04-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-03-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Mixing area - the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to, stucco mix. Violation observed on or about 2/26/15. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 G08 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-04-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-03-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: a. Mixing area - the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to, stucco mix. Violation observed on or about 2/26/15. |
|
| Citation ID |
02004 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-04-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-03-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Mixing area - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to, stucco mix. Violation observed on or about 2/26/15. |
|
|
