|
340101807
|
0420600
|
2014-11-24
|
12668 FLATWOOD CREEK DRIVE, GIBSONTON, FL, 33534
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2014-11-24
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-11-29
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261052 C01 II |
| Issuance Date |
2014-12-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-22 |
| Current Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-02-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a) For employees working at 12668 Flatwood Creek Drive in Gibsonton, as observed on or about November 24, 2014. Employees were observed working on the second floor of the new residential home. The stairway located in the middle of the home was not equipped with a stair rail system along the unprotected side to prevent employees form falling to the lower level. The second floor sheathing to the first floor ground measured approximately 11 feet 2 inches. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-12-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-22 |
| Current Penalty |
30800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
30800.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-02-09 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) For employees working at 12668 Flatwood Creek Drive in Gibsonton, as observed on or about November 24, 2014. Employees were observed working on the roof with a 6:12 pitch. The eave to ground height was approximately 20 feet and the employees had no fall protection system in place. b) For employees working at 12668 Flatwood Creek Drive in Gibsonton, as observed on or about November 24, 2014. Employees were working on the second floor of the new residential home where 2 window openings were unguarded. Employees were exposed to fall hazard of approximately 9 feet 4 inches. Rejevaz Services Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 989212, citation number 02, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on 06 November, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 1200 Quail Drive, Sarasota, Florida. Rejevaz Services Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 973834, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on 30 June, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at Alistar Drive, Wimauma, Florida. Rejevaz Services Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 989212, citation number 01, item number 003 and was affirmed as a final order on 06 November, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 1200 Quail Drive, Sarasota, Florida. |
|
|
|
339931883
|
0420600
|
2014-09-03
|
11936 GREENGATE DR., HUDSON, FL, 34669
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2014-09-03
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-10-25
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-12 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a) On or about 09/3/2014 on apartment building # 11936 rooftop (5/12 slope), where plywood panels were being installed, fall protection, that is, harnesses, lanyards and lifelines, were not used exposing employees to a 20 ft. fall hazard. |
|
|
|
339892127
|
0420600
|
2014-08-08
|
1200 QUAIL DRIVE, SARASOTA, FL, 34231
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2014-08-08
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-11-29
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-11 |
| Current Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-06 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. a) For employees working at 1200 Quail Drive in Sarasota, as observed on or about August 08, 2014. Employees were observed using an extension ladder to gain access to the roof. The eave to ground height was approximately 35 feet. The ladder was extended above the upper landing surface approximately 12 inches. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260701 B |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-09-23 |
| Current Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-06 |
| Nr Instances |
10 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall or come against, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement: a) For employees working at 1200 Quail Drive in Sarasota, as observed on or about August 08, 2014. Employees were observed working on the roof of a new residential home where ten 32 inch tall reinforcing steel bars were unguarded approximately 28 feet 8 inches beneath the working location. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B14 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-11 |
| Current Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-06 |
| Nr Instances |
10 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached), where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening is less than 39 inches (1.0 M) above the walking/working surface, is not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system. a) For employees working at 1200 Quail Drive located in Sarasota, as observed on or about August 08, 2014. Employees were working on the second and third floors of the new residential home where 10 window openings were unguarded. Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 14 feet and 28 feet. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-09-23 |
| Current Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-06 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) For employees working at 1200 Quail Drive in Sarasota, as observed on or about August 8, 2014. Employees were working on the roof of a new residential home without the use of a fall protection system. Employees were not trained to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-11 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-09-23 |
| Current Penalty |
6160.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6160.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-06 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) For employees working at 1200 Quail Drive in Sarasota, as observed on or about August 8, 2014. Employees were observed working on the roof with a 5:12 pitch. The eave to ground height was approximately 35 feet and the employees had no fall protection system in place. Rejevaz Services Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 973834, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on June 30, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at Alistar Drive, Wimauma, Florida. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260404 F06 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-06 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: a) For employees working at 1200 Quail Drive located in Sarasota, as observed on or about August 08, 2014. Employees were using extension cords connected to a splitter to supply power to electrical tools. The splitter in use did not have a ground prong so the path to ground was not permanent and continuous. |
|
|
|
339738346
|
0420600
|
2014-04-10
|
ALISTAR MANOR DRIVE, WIMAUMA, FL, 33598
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2014-04-10
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-11-29
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-06-04 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-06-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about 04/10/2014 at the construction of a residence at Alistar Manor Drive in Wimauma Florida, an employee doing roofing work was observed without fall protection and exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 28 feet. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D11 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-06-04 |
| Current Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-06-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded: (a) On or about 04/10/2014 at the construction of a residence at Alistar Manor Drive in Wimauma Florida, the lifelines of the fall arrest system were subject to abrasion when rapped around a wood rafter. |
|
|
