Search icon

OLD DOMINION GROUP INC - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: OLD DOMINION GROUP INC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit

OLD DOMINION GROUP INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act.

Status: Inactive

The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders.

Date Filed: 30 Aug 2013 (12 years ago)
Date of dissolution: 11 Dec 2019 (5 years ago)
Last Event: VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION
Event Date Filed: 11 Dec 2019 (5 years ago)
Document Number: P13000072422
FEI/EIN Number NOT APPLICABLE

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 807 PINE ST, DESTIN, FL, 32541, US
Mail Address: PO BOX 5918, DESTIN, FL, 32540, US
ZIP code: 32541
County: Okaloosa
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
SANDES DEMETRIO President 807 PINE ST, DESTIN, FL, 32541
SANDES DEMETRIO Agent 807 PINE ST, DESTIN, FL, 32541

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION 2019-12-11 - -

Documents

Name Date
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION 2019-12-11
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-04-29
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-04-27
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-03-20
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-03-29
ANNUAL REPORT 2015-05-04
ANNUAL REPORT 2014-03-27
Domestic Profit 2013-08-30

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
344033659 0419700 2019-05-23 119 CHIVAS LANE, SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL, 32459
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2019-05-23
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2021-02-12

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260102 A01
Issuance Date 2019-06-12
Current Penalty 3751.0
Initial Penalty 3751.0
Final Order 2019-07-15
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: a. At the temporary construction worksite, on or about May 23, 2019, an employee using a pneumatic nail gun did not use eye protection and was exposed to eye injury caused by flying debris.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2019-06-12
Abatement Due Date 2019-07-09
Current Penalty 21879.0
Initial Penalty 21879.0
Final Order 2019-07-15
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. At the temporary construction worksite, employees working at elevations of six feet or more above the lower level are not protected from fall hazards using fall protection systems: The employer fails to assure effective protection against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on May 23, 2016, as 2 employees are installing roof trusses and framing materials to the right side elevation, second level of a new residential home located at 119 Chivas Lane in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida, and are not protected from a 26 foot fall hazard by the use of fall protection systems. b. At the temporary construction worksite, an employee working at elevations of six feet or more above the lower level is not protected from fall hazards using fall protection systems: The employer fails to assure effective protection against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on May 23, 2016, when as an employee is installing framing materials to the second level of a new residential home located at 119 Chivas Lane in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida, and is not protected from a 14 foot fall hazard by the use of fall protection systems. Old Dominion Group Inc was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1240598, citation number 1, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on September 14, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at Emma Grace Lane, Lot 30, in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida 32459. Old Dominion Group Inc was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1160776, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on November 10, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 45 Watersound Lane, Lot 52, in Watersound, Florida 32413.
342405982 0419700 2017-06-14 LOT 30, EMMA GRACE LANE, SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL, 32459
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2017-06-15
Emphasis P: FALL, L: FALL
Case Closed 2020-08-19

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260100 A
Issuance Date 2017-07-20
Current Penalty 2173.0
Initial Penalty 2173.0
Final Order 2017-09-14
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets: a. On or about June 14, 2017, employees rigging trusses and sending them up to the employees were not wearing hard hats and were being exposed to head injuries.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2017-07-20
Current Penalty 5070.0
Initial Penalty 5070.0
Final Order 2017-09-14
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about June 14, 2017, employees setting trusses were not protected from a 10 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system. b. On or about June 14, 2017, an employee sheathing the right side of the home from a walk board was not protected from a 7.5 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19261053 B13
Issuance Date 2017-07-20
Current Penalty 2173.0
Initial Penalty 2173.0
Final Order 2017-09-14
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: a. On or about June 14, 2017, employees were using the top step of an 8-foot step ladder to gain access and exit from the trusses. They were being exposed to 8 feet fall hazard.
341607760 0419700 2016-07-08 45 WATERSOUND LN LOT 52, WATERSOUND, FL, 32413
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2016-07-08
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2018-09-19

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2016-08-01
Current Penalty 2800.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2016-11-10
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a. On or about July 8, 2016, on the northeast side of a new construction residential house, two employees installing framing were not protected from an 25 feet fall hazard by the use of a personal fall protection system.

Date of last update: 01 Apr 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State