| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2012-08-22
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, N: LEAD, N: CHROME6, L: EISAX
|
| Case Closed |
2013-01-14
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
467414 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
531658 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-18 |
| Current Penalty |
1785.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2975.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
23 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about August 22, 2012, the employer had not developed, implemented, or maintained a written hazard communication program for employees handling welding materials, such as but not limited to Galvanized Carbon Steel and Carbon Steel Rod in welding area and for an employee using the synthetic machining fluid, "Rustlick PowerSaw" in cutting area. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 G08 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a. On or about August 22, 2012, the employer did not maintain the copy of the required material safety data sheet for the synthetic machining fluid, "Rustlick PowerSaw'. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
23 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area a. On or about August 22, 2012, the employer did not provide effective information and training to employees who had been exposed to hazardous chemical "Rustlick PowerSaw" in the cutting area nor employees who had been exposed to welding materials such as but not limit to Galvanized Carbon Steel and Carbon Steel Rod in the welding area. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a. An employee conducting welding activities in the welding area was exposed to a noise dose of 77.6%, or an equivalent dBA (decibels A scale) of 88.17 dBA, which was capable of causing hearing loss. The sampling was performed for 378 minutes during one work shift on August 22, 2012. The employer had not established a hearing conservation program. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-07-19
|
| Emphasis |
N: SSTARG11, P: FORKLIFT, L: EISAOF, L: EISAX, L: FORKLIFT
|
| Case Closed |
2013-02-20
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
587938 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100147 C04 II |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-28 |
| Current Penalty |
1785.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2975.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section: a. On or about July 18, 2012, employees, servicing equipment throughout the manufacturing area, were exposed to hazards resulting from the unexpected release of stored energy because the employer did not have clear and specific written energy control procedures that outlined the scope, rules and steps for the control of hazardous energy for various machines, such as but not limited to the Ficep A 164T machine. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100215 A04 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Current Penalty |
1071.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1785.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: a. On or about July 18, 2012, in the FICEP area, employees were using the Dayton 10-inch Bench Grinder to grind steel pieces with the work rest adjusted approximately 3/8-inches away from the grinding wheel, exposing themselves to struck-by hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100215 B09 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: a. On or about July 18, 2012, in the FICEP area, employees using the Dayton 10-inch Bench Grinder to grind metal pieces had the adjustable tongue for the left grinding wheel 1 inch away from the grinding wheel, exposing themselves to struck-by hazards. b. On or about July 18, 2012, in the FICEP area, employees using the Dayton 10-inch Bench Grinder to grind metal pieces had the adjustable tongue for the right grinding wheel 1-3/16 inches away from the grinding wheel, exposing themselves to struck-by hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100215 D03 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Current Penalty |
1071.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1785.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.215(d)(3): The contact surface(s) of wheel(s), blotter(s) or flange(s) on grinding machine(s) were not flat and free or foreign matter: a. On or about July 18, 2012, in the FICEP area, the employer did not ensure that the two grinding wheels used on the Dayton 10-inch Bench Grinder had flat contact surfaces. Both grinding stones were grooved by the parts being grinded, and exposed the employees to struck-by hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100303 E01 II |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Current Penalty |
1428.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2380.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.303(e)(1)(ii): Markings were not provided on electrical equipment giving voltage, current, wattage and other markings as necessary: a. On or about July 18, 2012, in the Vinyl Forming area, the electrical panels and cabinets did not have markings indicating the voltage, current, wattage or other markings. b. On or about July 18, 2012, in the Steel Forming area, the electrical panels and cabinets did not have markings indicating voltage, current, wattage or other markings. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100303 F02 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: a. On or about July 18, 2012, in the Vinyl Forming area, the electric panel on the east wall had circuit breakers #2 and #10 in the ON position and the breakers were not marked to indicate their purpose. b. On or about July 18, 2012, in the Vinyl Forming area and Steel Forming area, the on/off switch panels for the Siemens Fiab HF AB, Forsstrom HF machines, Weld Master Miller 112 and the VS-355AC semi-automatic saw, among other equipment, were not marked to indicate their purpose. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100305 B01 II |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Current Penalty |
1428.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2380.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a. On or about July 18, 2012, in the Vinyl Forming area, the electric panel on the east wall had an unused circuit-breaker knockout that was not effectively closed and the metal bus bar was visible, exposing employees to electrical hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100157 E03 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-04 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
20 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: a. On or about July 18, 2012, throughout the manufacturing area, the employer did not ensure that portable fire extinguishers were subjected to an annual maintenance check. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 B |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: a. On or about July 18, 2012, in the FICEP area, employees grinding steel parts were using a Dayton 10-inch bench grinder on a stand that had not been anchored to the ground, exposing themselves to struck-by injuries. |
|
|
