Search icon

MUNOZ STUCCO INC. - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: MUNOZ STUCCO INC.
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit

MUNOZ STUCCO INC. is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act.

Status: Inactive

The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders.

Date Filed: 29 Oct 2012 (12 years ago)
Date of dissolution: 01 Dec 2014 (10 years ago)
Last Event: VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION
Event Date Filed: 01 Dec 2014 (10 years ago)
Document Number: P12000090764
FEI/EIN Number 461314096

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 501 MOROCCO AVE, ORLANDO, FL, 32807, US
Mail Address: 501 MOROCCO AVE, ORLANDO, FL, 32807, US
ZIP code: 32807
County: Orange
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
MUNOZ CARLOS A President 501 MOROCCO AVE., ORLANDO, FL, 32807
MUNOZ CARLOS A Agent 501 MOROCCO AVE, ORLANDO, FL, 32807

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION 2014-12-01 - -
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2014-09-26 - -
REINSTATEMENT 2013-11-25 - -
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS 2013-11-25 501 MOROCCO AVE, ORLANDO, FL 32807 -
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2013-09-27 - -

Documents

Name Date
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION 2014-12-01
REINSTATEMENT 2013-11-25
Domestic Profit 2012-10-29

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
339980393 0419700 2014-10-01 1046 WETLAND RIDGE CIRCLE, MIDDLEBURG, FL, 32068
Inspection Type Prog Related
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2014-10-01
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2016-08-31

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B13
Issuance Date 2015-01-16
Current Penalty 2000.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2015-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about October 01, 2014, on the 5:12 pitch roof, employees performing stucco work were not protected from a 10 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Citation ID 01001B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260503 A01
Issuance Date 2015-01-16
Abatement Due Date 2015-03-06
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2015-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about October 1, 2014, employees working from elevations were not trained about fall protection.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19260451 B01 I
Issuance Date 2015-01-16
Current Penalty 3200.0
Initial Penalty 3200.0
Final Order 2015-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line Munoz Stucco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 916143, Serious citation number 01, item number 002(a) and was affirmed as a final order on August 13, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 410 Anastasia Blvd., Saint Augustine, FL. 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary: a. On or about October 1, 2014, in front of the garage, the tri-ladder scaffold system was missing planks on the top rung where employees were transferring stucco mud to the roof while conducting stucco work.
339893596 0420600 2014-08-08 940 W. CANTON AVE., WINTER PARK, FL, 32789
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2014-08-08
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2014-10-23

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 901670
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19260451 H02 II
Issuance Date 2014-09-15
Abatement Due Date 2014-09-25
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2014-10-23
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: a) On or about 08/08/2014 at the job site where employees working/walking on the lower level of a scaffold system applying stucco to the walls of the apartment building were not protected with toeboards. Exposing the employees to a struck by hazard.
339534588 0420600 2013-12-30 701 S HOWARD AVE, TAMPA, FL, 33606
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-12-30
Emphasis L: EISAOF, L: FALL
Case Closed 2015-10-14

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 866767
Safety Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 953447
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260454 A
Issuance Date 2014-01-23
Current Penalty 1680.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2014-03-06
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold(s) trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize those hazards associated with the type of scaffold(s) being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. a. At the site, employee working from a Genie S-65 aerial lift was not trained by a qualified person in the matter to recognize the hazards associated with working from aerial lifts, on or about 12/27/13.
339161432 0419700 2013-06-26 410 ANASTASIA BLVD., SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL, 32084
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-06-26
Emphasis L: EISAOF, L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2014-07-10

Related Activity

Type Inspection
Activity Nr 916226
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260100 A
Issuance Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 2000.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2013-08-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about June 26, 2013, on the east side of the building, employees working on the tubular framed scaffold underneath another employee working overhead was not wearing a hard hat, exposing themselves to falling debris, material, or equipment.
Citation ID 01001B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 H02 II
Issuance Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-08-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: a. On or about June 26, 2013, on the east, west, and south side of the building, the tubular framed scaffold did not have toe boards to protect employees from falling debris, material or equipment.
Citation ID 01002A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 B01 I
Issuance Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 2480.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2013-08-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary: a. On or about June 26, 2013, on the south side of the building, the tubular framed scaffold system was missing planks on the fourth level where employees were conducting stucco work, exposing themselves to a 30 feet fall hazard.
Citation ID 01002B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01
Issuance Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-08-13
Nr Instances 3
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a. On or about June 26, 2013, on the west side of the architectural arch structure, the 2nd level of the tubular framed scaffold did not have guardrails, exposing employees to a 14 feet 7 inches fall hazard. b. On or about June 26, 2013, on the south side of the architectural arch structure, the 3rd level of the tubular framed scaffold did not have guardrails, exposing employees to a 30 feet fall hazard. c. On or about June 26, 2013, on the east side of the architectural arch structure, the 2nd level of the tubular framed scaffold did not have guardrails, exposing employees to a 14 feet fall hazard.
Citation ID 01002C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 E01
Issuance Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2013-08-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcture, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access: a. On or about June 26, 2013, on the east side of the building, the tubular framed scaffold system did not have a ladder, exposing employees to a 14 feet fall hazard.
Citation ID 01002D
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260454 A
Issuance Date 2013-07-19
Abatement Due Date 2013-08-14
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2013-08-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a. On or about June 26, 2013, the employer did not train employees about working from scaffold systems and the hazards associated with them.
Citation ID 01005
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B01
Issuance Date 2013-07-19
Current Penalty 2480.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2013-08-13
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On or about April 11, 2013, on the architectural arch structure, employees performing stucco work were not protected from a 30 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.

Date of last update: 02 Mar 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State