| Docket Date |
2023-07-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-21
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-05
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Citation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-11
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 10, 2023 reply brief and request for oral argument are stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificates of service do not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-10
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief ~ **STRICKEN** TO SALBO CONSTRUCTION, INC.'S ANSWER BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-10
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-27
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ LATITUDE WINDOWS, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Salbo Construction, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
Salbo Construction, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellee Salbo Construction's March 14, 2022 amended appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, and was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index. An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN** SALBO CONSTRUCTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Salbo Construction, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellee Salbo Construction, Inc.'s appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-10
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Salbo Construction, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-10
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Salbo Construction, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-10
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ SALBO CONSTRUCTION, INC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Salbo Construction, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees Salbo Construction, Inc. and Latitude Windows, Inc.’s February 23, 2023 amended motions for extension of time are granted. Appellee Salbo Construction shall serve their answer brief within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, and appellee Latitude Windows, Inc. shall serve their answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-23
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ SALBO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Salbo Construction, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee Salbo Construction, Inc. and Latitude Windows, Inc.'s February 22, 2023 motions for extension of time are stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that they are computer-generated documents which do not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). Amended documents in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-22
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ **STRICKEN** LATITUDE WINDOWS, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Salbo Construction, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-24
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-24
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Amended Appellant's Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellant's appendix to the amended initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not completely text searchable, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-20
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-20
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Amended Appellant's Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 1,240 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-18
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the notice of inability to transmit the record filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on January 4, 2023, it is ORDERED that appellant shall file a report, within five (5) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment for and preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that appellant's initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 in that the arguments for review are not written out in the Table of Contents and as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). An amended brief in compliance with the rules shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The time for any responsive briefing shall be tolled until service of this amended brief.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-10
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 4, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief no later than January 10, 2023. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 3, 2023 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b) and as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). An amended document in compliance with the Rules shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-04
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF INABILITY TO TRANSMIT THE RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-03
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-27
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-26
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Sas Mijerlo
|
|
