|
338204464
|
0420600
|
2013-01-10
|
18712 MILTON KEYNES, LAND O LAKES, FL, 34637
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2013-01-11
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-12-04
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-02-01 |
| Current Penalty |
3200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3200.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a) 18712 Milton Keynes, Land O Lakes, FL - lanai roof - an employee was exposed to a fall of 10 feet 2 inches while installing lath, in that, the use of fall protection was not enforced when working from a roof with a 4/12 pitch, on or about 1/10/13. Garcia's Construction Services Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection 740201, citation 01, item 01 and was affirmed as a final order on 01/08/13, with respect to a workplace located at 18728 Milton Keynes, Land O Lakes, FL 34637. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-02-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-03-21 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: (a) 18712 Milton Keynes, Land O Lakes, FL - an employee was exposed to a fall of 10 feet 2 inches while installing lath. The employer did not provide a training program to the employee exposed to a fall hazard, on or about 1/10/13. |
|
|
|
337402010
|
0420600
|
2012-11-09
|
18728 MILTON KEYNES, LAND O LAKES, FL, 34637
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-11-09
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2016-11-16
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-12 |
| Current Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) South side - patio roof - an employee was exposed to a fall of 10 feet 4 inches while installing lath, in that, the use of fall protection was not enforced when working from a roof on a 3/12 pitched roof. Violation observed on or about 11/9/12. |
|
|
|
336990197
|
0420600
|
2012-10-19
|
3749 ROUND TABLE CT, LAND O LAKES, FL, 34638
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-10-19
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-12-04
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-10-26 |
| Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) a) North side - behind the patio - 2nd level - an employee was exposed to a fall of 13 feet while taking measurements and cutting lath. The scaffold was not fully planked, in that, it was 40 inches wide with one 10 inch wood plank and one 19 inch metal plank. b) West side - 2nd level - an employee was exposed to a fall of 13 feet 3 inches while using the scaffold to determine if the stucco was dry. The scaffold was not fully planked, in that, it was 40 inches wide with three 10 inch wood planks. c) West side - 3nd level - an employee was exposed to a fall of 19 feet 7 inches while using the scaffold to determine if the stucco was dry. The scaffold was not fully planked, in that, it was 40 inches wide with one 10 inch wood plank and one 19 inch metal plank. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-10-26 |
| Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. a) North side - behind the patio - 2nd level - an employee was exposed to a fall of 13 feet while using the end frames to access and egress the scaffold. b) West side - 2nd level to the 3rd level - an employee was exposed to a fall of approximately 6 feet while using the end frames to access and egress the scaffold. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-10-26 |
| Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-03-27 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a) On or about October 19, 2012, an employee working from the 2nd level of a tubular scaffold where no guardrail system was being used exposing him to a fall of 13 feet hazard while taking measurements and cutting lath. b) On or about October 19, 2012, an employee was exposed to a fall of 13 feet 3 inches while using the scaffold to determine if the stucco was dry. There was no guardrail system on the north end of the scaffold. c) On or about October 19, 2012, an employee was exposed to a fall of 19 feet 7 inches while using the scaffold to determine if the stucco was dry. There was no guardrail system on the north end of the scaffold. |
|
|
