| Docket Date |
2021-07-15
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Record-on-Appeal ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before July 8, 2021, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that the record on appeal has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the record on appeal is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Granting Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ ORDERED that appellee, Stewart Title Guaranty Company’s April 16, 2021 motion to dismiss is granted, and the above-styled appeal is dismissed as to appellant, Raziel Ofer only. See Hood v. Union Planters Bank, 941 So. 2d 1175, 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (dismissing appeal where appellant had no standing to appeal “because he was not one of the parties named below and made no effort to intervene”).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-26
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ EVAN KAGAN AND LEGAL ELITE TITLE, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-22
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-16
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ AS TO APPELLANT RAZIEL OFER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Discharging Show Cause ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellants’ notice of status filed November 24, 2020, this court’s November 24, 2020 order to show cause is discharged.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-25
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause ~ SUPPLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order
|
| Description |
Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ **DISCHARGED**ORDERED that appellants are directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed or other sanctions imposed for failure to comply with this court's November 6, 2020 order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF STATUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on October 29, 2020, appellants are ordered to file a report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment and preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-29
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-21
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
| Description |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ INVOICE VOIDED
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
| Description |
ORD-Reinstatement ~ ORDERED that the appellants’ October 21, 2020 motion for reinstatement is granted, and the above-styled appeal is reinstated.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-20
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk ~ (REINSTATED ON 10/21/2020)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-20
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-20
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-No Filing Fee ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for non-payment of the $300.00 filing fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Requiring Corporation/Entity to Obtain Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Corporation must be Represented by Atty-w/d ~ ORDERED that the March 3, 2021 motion of Herman J. Russomanno III, Esq., and the law firm of Russomanno & Borrello, P.A. for leave to withdraw as counsel for appellees Legal Elite Title, Inc. and Evan Kagan is granted. A corporation may not appear unrepresented by counsel in a Florida court. See Telepower Communication, Inc. v. LTI Vehicle Leasing Corp., 658 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, C.A., 476 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Parrot Cove Marina, LLC v. Duncan Seawall Dock & Boatlift, Inc., 978 So. 2d 811, 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, it isORDERED that Legal Elite Title, Inc. shall be barred from any participation in this case unless within twenty (20) days from the date of this order an attorney licensed to practice law enters an appearance on its behalf;FURTHER ORDERED that this case is stayed pending the above. Further, ORDERED that appellees Legal Elite Title, Inc. and Evan Kagan’s March 23, 2021 and appellee Stewart Title Guaranty Company’s March 22, 2021 motions for extension of time are granted, and appellees’ shall serve the answer brief on or before April 26, 2021. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE AS TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-23
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ Legal Elite Title, Inc.'s and Evan Kagan
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-22
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellants’ March 17, 2021 notice of appearance is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. Further, ORDERED that appellants’ March 17, 2021 notice of appearance is also stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-03
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Requiring Corporation/Entity to Obtain Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Corporation must be Represented by Atty-w/d ~ ORDERED that the February 17, 2021 motion of Alan Bryce Grossman, Esq., and Grossman Law Florida, LLC, for leave to withdraw as counsel for appellants is granted. A corporation may not appear unrepresented by counsel in a Florida court. See Telepower Communication, Inc. v. LTI Vehicle Leasing Corp., 658 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, C.A., 476 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Parrot Cove Marina, LLC v. Duncan Seawall Dock & Boatlift, Inc., 978 So. 2d 811, 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, it isORDERED that the appeal on behalf of 942 Penn RR, LLC shall be dismissed unless within twenty (20) days from the date of this order an attorney licensed to practice law enters an appearance on its behalf;FURTHER ORDERED that this case is stayed pending the above.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-19
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-17
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ Legal Elite Title, Inc. and Evan Kagan
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 03/26/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-11
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
| On Behalf Of |
Stewart Title Guaranty Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 03/26/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-25
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that upon consideration of appellants’ response filed January 11, 2021, this court’s January 6, 2021 order to show cause is discharged. Further, ORDERED that appellants’ January 11, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief on or before January 25, 2021. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-11
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-11
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ RENEWED AND CORRECTED
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ **DISCHARGED**ORDERED that appellants in the above-styled case are directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellants' initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellants’ December 10, 2020 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-10
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-02
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Raziel Ofer
|
|
