Search icon

M K. CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: M K. CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit

M K. CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act.

Status: Inactive

The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders.

Date Filed: 18 Jul 2012 (13 years ago)
Date of dissolution: 26 Sep 2014 (11 years ago)
Last Event: ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT
Event Date Filed: 26 Sep 2014 (11 years ago)
Document Number: P12000062888
FEI/EIN Number 46-0629316

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 607 W 60 TERRACE, BRADENTON, FL, 34207, US
Mail Address: 5379 LYONS RD, UNIT # 225, COCONUT CREEK, FL, 33073, US
ZIP code: 34207
County: Manatee
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
SUAZO LEONEL Secretary 3679 SE GATEHOUSE CIRCLE 213, STUART, FL, 34994
MARTINEZ AMADOR President 2273 NW 7TH STREET, MIAMI, FL, 33033
MARTINEZ AMADOR Director 2273 NW 7TH STREET, MIAMI, FL, 33033
SUAZO LEONEL S Agent 607 W 60 TH TERRACE, BRADENTON, FL, 34207

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2014-09-26 - -
AMENDMENT 2012-08-31 - -

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2013-04-30
Amendment 2012-08-31
Domestic Profit 2012-07-18

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
338544034 0420600 2013-01-29 5833 S. 5TH ST., TAMPA, FL, 33611
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-01-29
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2020-04-23

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 C02
Issuance Date 2013-02-21
Current Penalty 2520.0
Initial Penalty 2520.0
Final Order 2013-03-20
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: Instance 1) At the jobsite, east side of residence, the base of the tubular welded frame scaffolding was not adequately supported, in that, base plates were not installed on the scaffold legs to provide a firm foundation. Instance 2) At the jobsite, north side of residence, the base of the tubular welded frame scaffolding was not adequately supported, in that, mud sills were not installed on the scaffold legs to provide a firm foundation.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 E01
Issuance Date 2013-02-21
Current Penalty 2520.0
Initial Penalty 2520.0
Final Order 2013-03-20
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. Instance 1) At the jobsite, east side of residence, an employee was exposed to fall hazards up to 19'2" while climbing up the end section of the through style tubular welded frame scaffolding, in that, an adequate means of access and egress was not provided. Instance 2) At the jobsite, north side of residence, employees were exposed to fall hazards up to 12'8" while climbing up the end section of the through style tubular welded frame scaffolding, in that, an adequate means of access and egress was not provided.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01
Issuance Date 2013-02-21
Current Penalty 2520.0
Initial Penalty 2520.0
Final Order 2013-03-20
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: Instance 1) At the jobsite, east side of residence, an employee in the process of plastering was exposed to a 19'2" fall hazard in that, guard rails were not installed on the top work platform on tubular welded frame scaffolding, 3 levels high. Instance 2) At the jobsite, north side of residence, employees in the process of plastering were exposed to a 12'8" fall hazard in that, guard rails were not installed on the top work platform on tubular welded frame scaffolding, 2 levels high.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B01
Issuance Date 2013-02-21
Current Penalty 2520.0
Initial Penalty 2520.0
Final Order 2013-03-20
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) At the jobsite, east side of the building, an employee in the process of plastering work while standing on a steep roof, 6 in 12 pitch, was exposed to a 9'4" fall hazard, in that, fall protection equipment was not installed or utilized. Observed on or about 1/29/13.
338029416 0418800 2012-12-27 7801 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BOCA RATON, FL, 33487
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2012-12-27
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2020-04-08

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01 VII
Issuance Date 2013-04-01
Abatement Due Date 2013-04-11
Current Penalty 2800.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2013-04-25
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee shall be protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: a. On or about December 27, 2012, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while working without a means of fall protection on the third tier of a fabricated frame scaffold.
Citation ID 01001B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 F03
Issuance Date 2013-04-01
Abatement Due Date 2013-04-11
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-04-25
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a. On or about December 27, 2012, at the above addressed job site, an employee who was working on fabricated frame scaffold that had not been inspected by a competent person was exposed to fall hazards.
Citation ID 01001C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 E01
Issuance Date 2013-04-01
Abatement Due Date 2013-04-11
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-04-25
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a. On or about December 27, 2012, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while accessing a fabricated frame scaffold which was not equipped with access ladders.
336726583 0420600 2012-10-05 6820 SCENIC DRIVE, APOLLO BEACH, FL, 33572
Inspection Type Fat/Cat
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2012-10-10
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2020-04-03

Related Activity

Type Accident
Activity Nr 599814
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 B01
Issuance Date 2012-12-21
Current Penalty 2800.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a.At the site, employees were exposed to a 14 feet fall hazard, in that, a tubular welded frame scaffold two frames high with a two foot trestle scaffold on the top frame did not have the working platform fully planked as required. Two 19 inches wide prefabricated planks were used on the 60 inches wide scaffold frame.
Citation ID 01002A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 F07
Issuance Date 2012-12-21
Current Penalty 2800.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: a. At the site, employees were exposed to a 14 feet fall hazard, in that, a tubular welded frame scaffold two frames high with a two foot trestle scaffold on the top frame did not have guardrails and was not provided with a fully planked working platform. The scaffold was erected, moved and altered without the supervision of a competent person knowledgeable on scaffold safety.
Citation ID 01002B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260454 A
Issuance Date 2012-12-21
Abatement Due Date 2013-02-11
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards as required by paragraph (a)(1)-(5) of this section: a. At the site, employees were in progress of sheetrock installation and were using a tubular welded frame scaffold two frames high with a two foot trestle scaffold on the top frame without guardrails and without having the working platform fully planked. Employees involved in scaffold use were not provided training and education in the following: 1. The nature of fall hazards and any falling object hazards. 2. The correct procedures for dealing with erecting, maintaining, and disassembling the fall protection system and falling object protection system being used. 3. The proper use of the scaffold, and the proper handling of material on the scaffold. 4. The maximum intended load and load carrying capacities of the scaffold. 5. Any other pertinent requirements of Subpart "L" (Scaffolds) under 29 CFR 1926.
Citation ID 01002C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260454 B
Issuance Date 2012-12-21
Abatement Due Date 2013-02-11
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question including the topics as required by paragraphs (b)(1)-(4) of this section: a. At the site, employees were in progress of sheetrock installation and were erecting and moving a tubular welded frame scaffold two frames high with a two foot trestle scaffold on the top frame without guardrails and without having the working platform fully planked. Employees involved in scaffold erection were not provided training and education in the following: 1. The nature of scaffold hazards; 2. The correct procedures for erecting, dismantling, moving, operating, repairing, inspecting and maintaining the scaffold used; 3. The design criteria, maximum intended load-carrying capacity and intended use of the scaffold; 4. Any other pertinent requirements of Subpart "L" (Scaffolds) under 29 CFR 1926.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01
Issuance Date 2012-12-21
Current Penalty 6300.0
Initial Penalty 6300.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Related Event Code (REC) Accident
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level: a. At the site, employees were exposed to a 14 feet fall hazard, in that, a tubular welded frame scaffold two frames high with a two foot trestle scaffold on the top frame did not have guardrails and no other fall protection was provided while installing sheetrock on the walls and ceiling.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19260020 B01
Issuance Date 2012-12-21
Abatement Due Date 2013-02-11
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): A safety and health program was not initiated and/or maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provisions of the standard: a. The employer did not develop and implement a written safety and health program to address the company policy on safety as well as the employer/employee responsibilities.
Citation ID 02002
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19260050 D01
Issuance Date 2012-12-21
Abatement Due Date 2012-12-28
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.50(d)(1): First-aid supplies were not easily accessible when required: a. At the site, the employer did not maintain a first aid kit at the site so that medical supplies needed are readily available in the event of minor injuries to employees installing drywall.

Date of last update: 03 Apr 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State