| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-02-02
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-07-08
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-02-17 |
| Current Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-03-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 12' fall hazard, in that, the work platform was not fully planked. Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F15 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-02-17 |
| Current Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-03-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15): Ladders were used on scaffolds to increase the working level height of employees: (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, an employee was exposed to a 15' fall hazard, in that, a masons ladder was used on the scaffold work platform to achieve a greater height. Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260452 C03 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-02-17 |
| Current Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-03-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(3): Frames and panels were not joined together vertically by coupling or stacking pins or equivalent means: (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 12' fall hazard, in that, a portion of the top rail was secured by a "red tape". Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-02-17 |
| Current Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-03-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 14' fall hazard, in that, fall protection was not provided while on the roof of the residential house. Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-02-17 |
| Current Penalty |
7605.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
7605.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-03-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access: (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 12' fall hazard, in that, crossbraces were used as a means for access on to the scaffold and a ladder was not used. Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017. The Vimar Stucco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.451(e)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number586458, citation number01, item number 002 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/04/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 825 W. Brandon Blvd. Brandon, FL. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G04 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-02-17 |
| Current Penalty |
7605.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
7605.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-03-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews: (a) West scaffold - on a tubular welded frame scaffold, endrails were not used during masonry operation and exposed employees to a 12' fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017. The Vimar Stucco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.451(g(4)(I), which was contained in OSHA inspection number586458, citation number01, item number 003 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/04/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 825 W. Brandon Blvd. Brandon, FL. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2017-02-17 |
| Current Penalty |
1087.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1087.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-03-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a. West scaffold - training was not provided to employee(s) prior to masonry operations on a tubular and welded frame scaffold and were exposed to a 12' fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 2/2/2017. The Vimar Stucco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.454(a), which was contained in OSHA inspection number586458, citation number01, item number 004 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/04/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 825 W. Brandon Blvd. Brandon, FL. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F03 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-02-17 |
| Current Penalty |
305.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
305.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-03-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 12' fall hazard, in that, the work platform was not fully planked, there were no endrails and top rails were secured with a red tape. Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-08-21
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: EISAOF
|
| Case Closed |
2016-01-22
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-27 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): a. South scaffold - the employer did not have a written hazard communication program when materials such as, but not limited to Florida Super Stucco and sand were used during masonry operations. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a material safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: a. South scaffold - the employer did not have material safety data sheets when materials such as, but not limited to Florida Super Stucco and sand were used during masonry operations. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced: a. South scaffold - the employer did not have hazard communication training when materials such as, but not limited to Florida Super Stucco and sand were used during masonry operations. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access: a. South scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 14' fall hazard, in that, crossbraces were used as a means for access on to the scaffold and a ladder was not used. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G04 I |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews: a. South scaffold - on a Safway tubular welded frame scaffold, cross bracing sections were used on open sides as toprails and midrails were not used during masonry operations and exposed employee(s) to a 14' fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a. South scaffold - training was not provided to employee(s) prior to masonry operations on a Safway tubular and welded frame scaffold and were exposed to a 14' fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable: a. South scaffold - the employer did not have a respiratory protection program when employee(s) were required to use 3M N95 8210 respirator during masonry operations. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. South scaffold - employee(s) required to use 3M 8210 respirator during masonry operations did not have a medical evaluation. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-12-05 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a. South scaffold - employees required to use N95 3M 8210 respirator during masonry operations did not have fit tests. Violation observed on or about 8/21/12. |
|
|
